Literature DB >> 21543751

The long-latency reflex is composed of at least two functionally independent processes.

J Andrew Pruszynski1, Isaac Kurtzer, Stephen H Scott.   

Abstract

The nervous system counters mechanical perturbations applied to the arm with a stereotypical sequence of muscle activity, starting with the short-latency stretch reflex and ending with a voluntary response. Occurring between these two events is the enigmatic long-latency reflex. Although researchers have been fascinated by the long-latency reflex for over 60 years, some of the most basic questions about this response remain unresolved and often debated. In the present study we help resolve one such question by providing clear evidence that the human long-latency reflex during a naturalistic motor task is not a single functional response; rather, it appears to reflect the output of (at least) two functionally independent processes that overlap in time and sum linearly. One of these functional components shares an important attribute of the short-latency reflex (i.e., automatic gain scaling, sensitivity to background load), and the other shares a defining feature of voluntary control (i.e., task dependency, sensitivity to goal target position). We further show that the task-dependent component of long-latency activity reflects a feedback control process rather than the simplest triggered reaction to a mechanical stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21543751     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01052.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

1.  Sensing with the motor cortex.

Authors:  Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Aaron J Suminski
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Long-latency reflexes of elbow and shoulder muscles suggest reciprocal excitation of flexors, reciprocal excitation of extensors, and reciprocal inhibition between flexors and extensors.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Jenna Meriggi; Nidhi Parikh; Kenneth Saad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Critical damping conditions for third order muscle models: implications for force control.

Authors:  Davide Piovesan; Alberto Pierobon; Ferdinando A Mussa Ivaldi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Experimental measure of arm stiffness during single reaching movements with a time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Davide Piovesan; Alberto Pierobon; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Adaptation to Coriolis perturbations of voluntary body sway transfers to preprogrammed fall-recovery behavior.

Authors:  Avijit Bakshi; Joel Ventura; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.