Literature DB >> 31308095

Visual Feedback Processing of the Limb Involves Two Distinct Phases.

Kevin P Cross1, Tyler Cluff1,2, Tomohiko Takei1,3, Stephen H Scott4,5,6.   

Abstract

Muscle responses to mechanical disturbances exhibit two distinct phases: a response starting at ~20 ms that is fairly stereotyped, and a response starting at ~60 ms modulated by many behavioral contexts including goal-redundancy and environmental obstacles. Muscle responses to disturbances of visual feedback of the hand arise within ~90 ms. However, little is known whether these muscle responses are sensitive to behavioral contexts. We had 49 human participants (27 male) execute goal-directed reaches with visual feedback of their hand presented as a cursor. On random trials, the cursor jumped laterally to the reach direction, and thus, required a correction to attain the goal. The first experiment demonstrated that the response amplitude starting at 90 ms scaled with jump magnitude, but only for jumps <2 cm. For larger jumps, the duration of the muscle response scaled with the jump size starting after 120 ms. The second experiment demonstrated that the early response was sensitive to goal redundancy as wider targets evoked a smaller corrective response. The third experiment demonstrated that the early response did not consider the presence of obstacles, as this response routinely drove participants directly to the goal even though this path was blocked by an obstacle. Instead, the appropriate muscle response to navigate around the obstacle started after 120 ms. Our findings highlight that visual feedback of the limb involves two distinct phases: a response starting at 90 ms with limited sensitivity to jump magnitude and sensitive to goal-redundancy, and a response starting at 120 ms with increased sensitivity to jump magnitude and environmental factors.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The motor system can integrate proprioceptive feedback to guide an ongoing action in ~60 ms and is flexible to a broad range of behavioral contexts. In contrast, the present study identified that the motor response to a visual disturbance exhibits two distinct phases: an early response starting at 90 ms with limited scaling with disturbance size and sensitivity to goal-redundancy, and a slower response starting after 120 ms with increased sensitivity to disturbance size and sensitive to environmental obstacles. These data suggest visual feedback of the hand is processed through two distinct feedback processes.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback control; goal-directed corrections; human; reaching; task constraints; visual processing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31308095      PMCID: PMC6703887          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3112-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  78 in total

1.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C M Epstein; R S Turner; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching.

Authors:  S H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Correlation of primate superior colliculus and reticular formation discharge with proximal limb muscle activity.

Authors:  V Stuphorn; K P Hoffmann; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A motor learning strategy reflects neural circuitry for limb control.

Authors:  Kan Singh; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

8.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching.

Authors:  B L Day; P Brown
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia.

Authors:  L Pisella; H Gréa; C Tilikete; A Vighetto; M Desmurget; G Rode; D Boisson; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Time-to-Target Simplifies Optimal Control of Visuomotor Feedback Responses.

Authors:  Justinas Česonis; David W Franklin
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-24

2.  Feedback Adaptation to Unpredictable Force Fields in 250 ms.

Authors:  Frédéric Crevecoeur; James Mathew; Marie Bastin; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Can ongoing movements be guided by allocentric visual information when the target is visible?

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Martin Bossard; Eli Brenner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching.

Authors:  Shoko Kasuga; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Kevin P Cross; Parsa Balalaie; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Rotational dynamics in motor cortex are consistent with a feedback controller.

Authors:  Hari Teja Kalidindi; Kevin P Cross; Timothy P Lillicrap; Mohsen Omrani; Egidio Falotico; Philip N Sabes; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Continuous Tracking of Task Parameters Tunes Reaching Control Online.

Authors:  Antoine De Comite; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-07-22

7.  Towards a unified neural mechanism for reactive adaptive behaviour.

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.685

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.