Literature DB >> 28350944

Navigation and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: Where Are We Now?

Samuel C Overley1, Samuel K Cho1, Ankit I Mehta2, Paul M Arnold3.   

Abstract

Spine surgery has experienced much technological innovation over the past several decades. The field has seen advancements in operative techniques, implants and biologics, and equipment such as computer-assisted navigation and surgical robotics. With the arrival of real-time image guidance and navigation capabilities along with the computing ability to process and reconstruct these data into an interactive three-dimensional spinal "map", so too have the applications of surgical robotic technology. While spinal robotics and navigation represent promising potential for improving modern spinal surgery, it remains paramount to demonstrate its superiority as compared to traditional techniques prior to assimilation of its use amongst surgeons.The applications for intraoperative navigation and image-guided robotics have expanded to surgical resection of spinal column and intradural tumors, revision procedures on arthrodesed spines, and deformity cases with distorted anatomy. Additionally, these platforms may mitigate much of the harmful radiation exposure in minimally invasive surgery to which the patient, surgeon, and ancillary operating room staff are subjected.Spine surgery relies upon meticulous fine motor skills to manipulate neural elements and a steady hand while doing so, often exploiting small working corridors utilizing exposures that minimize collateral damage. Additionally, the procedures may be long and arduous, predisposing the surgeon to both mental and physical fatigue. In light of these characteristics, spine surgery may actually be an ideal candidate for the integration of navigation and robotic-assisted procedures.With this paper, we aim to critically evaluate the current literature and explore the options available for intraoperative navigation and robotic-assisted spine surgery.
Copyright © 2016 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT-based navigation; Mazor; Navigation; Pedicle screw; ROSA; Robotics; Spinal robotics; Spineassist

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28350944     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  47 in total

Review 1.  Spine surgical robotics: review of the current application and disadvantages for future perspectives.

Authors:  Junshen Huang; Yuxi Li; Lin Huang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-06-26

2.  Editorial on "Increased radiation but no benefits in pedicle screw accuracy with navigation versus a freehand technique in scoliosis surgery".

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza Ramos; Jacob F Schulz; Jaime A Gomez; Reza Yassari
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 3.  Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Yahya A Othman; Sohrab S Virk; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

4.  Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shutao Gao; Zhengtao Lv; Huang Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Minimal-invasive revision of adjacent level disease after MIS deformity surgery.

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Melanie Liem; SalahAddeen O Khalifah; Johannes Holz; Alf Giese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: A systemic review.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Syed A Quadri; Mudassir Farooqui; Alessandra Cathel; Blake Berman; Jerry Noel; Javed Siddiqi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  New spinal robotic technologies.

Authors:  Bowen Jiang; Tej D Azad; Ethan Cottrill; Corinna C Zygourakis; Alex M Zhu; Neil Crawford; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Photoacoustic imaging of a human vertebra: implications for guiding spinal fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Joshua Shubert; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Instrumentation complication rates following spine surgery: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) morbidity and mortality database.

Authors:  Jamal N Shillingford; Joseph L Laratta; Nana O Sarpong; Rami G Alrabaa; Meghan K Cerpa; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke; Charla R Fischer
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03

10.  Use of intraoperative navigation for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery is safe to consider.

Authors:  Harold G Moore; Andre M Samuel; Patrick J Burroughs; Neil Pathak; Dominick A Tuason; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.