Literature DB >> 31243701

Spine surgical robotics: review of the current application and disadvantages for future perspectives.

Junshen Huang1, Yuxi Li1, Lin Huang2.   

Abstract

In the past decade, intelligent medical technology has been a hot research direction, which results in a series of products such as image-assisted AI and tumor diagnostic auxiliary systems. In the field of surgery, surgical robotics is one of the most attractive intelligent technologies. After nearly a decade of revolution, robots have shown much superiority in spine surgery, and many published studies on accuracy and radiation volume have reported these advantages. However, in reviewing these articles, we found that some of them mentioned the shortcomings of robots, which led us to review the comprehensive evaluation of spinal robots. In this article, we summarize the aspects that have been mentioned in published articles as well as unpublished ones that we have concluded. Through these summaries, we hope that future researchers will be able to make targeted improvements to robots and broaden the future direction of spine surgery robotics. Spine surgical robotics is still widely believed to have a brilliant future application, but it needs to solve the disadvantages of not having a wide application range, not having a deep application depth and not having prominent advantages compared with other existing application technologies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis; Disadvantage; Intelligent orthopedic; Spine surgery; Surgical robotics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31243701     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00983-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  33 in total

1.  Pedicle screw insertion: robotic assistance versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Eric Thein; Barbara Kwiatkowski; Gerit Kulik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Navigation, robotics, and intraoperative imaging in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Florian Ringel; Jimmy Villard; Yu-Mi Ryang; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2014

3.  Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Ward Davies; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  [Assessment of the surgeon radiation exposure during a minimally invasive TLIF: Comparison between fluoroscopy and O-arm system].

Authors:  M Grelat; F Zairi; M Quidet; P Marinho; M Allaoui; R Assaker
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 1.553

5.  Monitoring the quality of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine by using a cumulative summation test.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Seung Hoo Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Teck Onn Lim; Ling Ping Hoo; Je-Min Yi; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Current applications of robotics in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jacob R Joseph; Brandon W Smith; Xilin Liu; Paul Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery.

Authors:  Alexander M Lieber; Gregory J Kirchner; Yehuda E Kerbel; Amrit S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy Using O-Arm, Robotic Guidance, or Freehand Technique: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Pietro Aniello Laudato; Katarzyna Pierzchala; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Sven Rainer Kantelhardt; Ramon Martinez; Stefan Baerwinkel; Ralf Burger; Alf Giese; Veit Rohde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Assessing the Intraoperative Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement by Using a Bone-Mounted Miniature Robot System through Secondary Registration.

Authors:  Keng-Liang Kuo; Yu-Feng Su; Chieh-Hsin Wu; Cheng-Yu Tsai; Chih-Hui Chang; Chih-Lung Lin; Tai-Hsin Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Stanley Kisinde; Xiaobang Hu; Shea Hesselbacher; Alexander M Satin; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weishang Li; Gaoyu Li; Wenting Chen; Lin Cong
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: a preliminary clinical report.

Authors:  Xiuyuan Chen; Fan Feng; Xiaosheng Yu; Shurong Wang; Zhipeng Tu; Yingchao Han; Quan Li; Hao Chen; Zhi Chen; Lifeng Lao; Hongxing Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Robotic Spine Surgery: Current State in Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Chau D Vo; Bowen Jiang; Tej D Azad; Neil R Crawford; Ali Bydon; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

5.  Percutaneous full endoscopic C1 laminectomy for developmental atlantal stenosis with myelopathy: a case report of three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yongpeng Lin; Siyuan Rao; Bingxin Liu; Yueli Sun; Shuai Zhao; Guoyi Su; Shudong Chen; Yongjin Li; Bolai Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 6.  Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Gayatri R Bankar; Ajay Keoliya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.