Virus-like particles (VLPs) are stable protein cages derived from virus coats. They have been used extensively as biomolecular platforms, e.g., nanocarriers or vaccines, but a convenient in situ technique is lacking for tracking functional status. Here, we present a simple way to monitor disassembly of 19F-labeled VLPs derived from bacteriophage Qβ by 19F NMR. Analysis of resonances, under a range of conditions, allowed determination not only of the particle as fully assembled but also as disassembled, as well as detection of a degraded state upon digestion by cells. This in turn allowed mutational redesign of disassembly and testing in both bacterial and mammalian systems as a strategy for the creation of putative, targeted-VLP delivery systems.
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are stable protein cages derived from virus coats. They have been used extensively as biomolecular platforms, e.g., nanocarriers or vaccines, but a convenient in situ technique is lacking for tracking functional status. Here, we present a simple way to monitor disassembly of 19F-labeled VLPs derived from bacteriophage Qβ by 19F NMR. Analysis of resonances, under a range of conditions, allowed determination not only of the particle as fully assembled but also as disassembled, as well as detection of a degraded state upon digestion by cells. This in turn allowed mutational redesign of disassembly and testing in both bacterial and mammalian systems as a strategy for the creation of putative, targeted-VLP delivery systems.
Virus-like particles (VLPs)
are icosahedral protein cages made up of hundreds of capsid protein
subunits from different viruses. They have well-defined structures
and can be strikingly stable under extremes of temperature,[1,2] pH,[2] and in different solvents.[3] These render them potentially suitable for encapsulating
materials such as proteins,[4,5] synthetic polymers,[6,7] oligonucleotides,[8,9] and smaller molecules.[10,11] Furthermore, their protein surface can be used to append different
functional groups, ligands or antigens for targeting,[12−14] imaging,[15] vaccination,[16,17] and other biomedical[18,19] purposes. Cellular internalization
of VLP has been predominantly determined by fluorescence microscopy[12,20] and/or transmission electron microscopy (TEM).[21,22] Although these techniques provide robust data on the position of
particles relative to target cells, they do not provide much information
on, e.g., disassembly status. The latter can be particularly important
when VLPs are applied as carriers, as cargo release is greatly dependent
on breakdown. Thus, it would be useful to develop a convenient way
for monitoring the multimeric state of VLPs to aid their design toward
such functional goals.19F-protein labeling can prove
invaluable because 19F generally has a very low background
in biological samples.
It is NMR-active with a wide chemical shift range making it sensitive
to the local environment, and has a high sensitivity, making it easy
to detect;[23] both useful for monitoring
structural and interaction changes. Thus, “background-free”
virus tracking in vivo could use 19F-NMR without obscurity
from the complex mixture of biomacromolecules in the cell. We envisaged
that labeling VLPs with a 19F-containing unnatural amino
acid (uAA) would allow us to monitor structural change of particles
at a molecular level via 19F-NMR.The VLP derived
from the bacteriophage Qβ is formed from
180 copies of a 132 amino acid subunit[24] and was chosen as a model for the introduction. Qβ-VLP is
considered to be more stable compared with other VLPs, such as MS2,
due to intersubunit disulfide linkages.[24] One approach to introducing uAAs involves the commandeering of “sense”
codons for amino acids such as methionine (Met) to incorporate Met
analogs;[25−28] trifluoroMet (Tfm) was chosen for close structural similarity, relatively
high F content (and so NMR sensitivity), and F magnetic equivalence
(and so simpler, stronger signal). Tfm has been used to probe enzyme
mechanism[27,29] and suggested as a residue that allows creation
of unusual physicochemical properties.[30] Wild-type (WT) Qβ contains no Met sites, thus conversion of
the Lys16 codon in the Qβ gene to Met codon would allow site-specific
incorporation. Site 16 is one of the most exposed on the particle,[31] and we reasoned would also provide an excellent
probe site (Figure a).
Figure 1
(a) Cellular strategy for genetic incorporation of Tfm into Qβ.
(b) Reducing ES-MS of Qβ-F (raw ion series, Figure S1a,b) shows ∼85% Tfm incorporation. Both DLS
(c) and TEM (d) reveal fully assembled discrete particles.
(a) Cellular strategy for genetic incorporation of Tfm into Qβ.
(b) Reducing ES-MS of Qβ-F (raw ion series, Figure S1a,b) shows ∼85% Tfm incorporation. Both DLS
(c) and TEM (d) reveal fully assembled discrete particles.Expression of this gene in Escherichia
coli Met-auxotroph B834(DE3) in the presence of Tfm
(∼1.7 mM)
under optimized conditions (see SI) allowed
the production of Qβ-Lys16Tfm (“Qβ-F”) with
∼85% F-incorporation (Figure b), a level consistent with prior levels in other proteins;[29] Met competes well with Tfm for the methionyl-tRNA
synthetase (MetRS)[32] and even after exhaustive
Met depletion 15% is incorporated. The integrity of VLPs formed from
the self-assembly of expressed Qβ-F was confirmed by both dynamic
light scattering (DLS) (Figure c) and TEM (Figure d). Their measured radius (15.3 ± 0.6 nm) was found to
be identical to WT within experimental error (Figure S2).When these intact Qβ-F VLPs were analyzed
by 19F-NMR, a broad resonance (full width at half height,
FWHH = ∼240
Hz) was observed with a shift of −40.68 ppm, and a remarkably
large R2 value of 760 s–1 (Figure a and Figure
S16). Controlled disassembly of the particles was achieved
through titrated addition of denaturant and reductant[33] and monitored by 19F-NMR. DenaturantSDS (0.2
M) gave a single sharp peak (FWHH = 12.6 Hz) with a shift of −40.90
ppm, and an R2 value of 8 s–1 (Figure S16); the significant change of chemical
shift and peak width suggested clear change of particle structure.
Reductant DTT alone had negligible effect. This was confirmed by native-PAGE
(dissemination of corresponding bands); when further analyzed under
denaturing conditions by SDS-PAGE, hexamers and pentamers were observed
(Figure c), consistent
with persistent disulfide bonds in subassemblies. Further treating
the same sample with reductant dithiothreitol (DTT) led to formation
of monomers (Figure c, right), characterized by similar chemical shift and peak width
to the 5/6-mers (δF = −40.90 ppm; FWHH = ∼7
Hz, Figure a). Taken
together, these results reveal that we can monitor the assembly state
of the VLPs using 19F NMR.
Figure 2
19F-NMR spectra of (a) Qβ-F
VLPs; (b) Qβ-CS
VLPs under different conditions. 1,1,1-Trifluoroacetone (TFA) was
added to all of the samples as an internal reference. The reference
peak was fixed to −86.40 ppm relative to CFCl3.
Intensity values have been rescaled for comparison (see Figure S3). (c) Left: Native-PAGE. Under nondenaturing
conditions, the particles have low mobility, consistent with a fully
assembled form. In the presence of 0.2 M SDS, the virus particles
are destabilized. Right: SDS-PAGE. Under denaturing conditions, a
range of oligomeric states are observed, stabilized by persistent
disulfide bonds. M, protein marker; Qβ-M, Qβ-K16 M intact
VLPs; heat, 90 °C, 60 min. Gel stain: Coomassie Blue.
19F-NMR spectra of (a) Qβ-F
VLPs; (b) Qβ-CS
VLPs under different conditions. 1,1,1-Trifluoroacetone (TFA) was
added to all of the samples as an internal reference. The reference
peak was fixed to −86.40 ppm relative to CFCl3.
Intensity values have been rescaled for comparison (see Figure S3). (c) Left: Native-PAGE. Under nondenaturing
conditions, the particles have low mobility, consistent with a fully
assembled form. In the presence of 0.2 M SDS, the virus particles
are destabilized. Right: SDS-PAGE. Under denaturing conditions, a
range of oligomeric states are observed, stabilized by persistent
disulfide bonds. M, protein marker; Qβ-M, Qβ-K16 M intact
VLPs; heat, 90 °C, 60 min. Gel stain: Coomassie Blue.Next, we exploited this ability to determine particle-state
as
a guide to particle design. As a proof of concept, we set out to develop
a more “flimsy” VLP system that might allow more ready
or rapid cargo release. Our 19F-NMR studies on Qβ-F
had suggested a role for reducible cross-linking. We therefore generated
a triple mutant (Qβ-K16M-C74S-C80S) in which the Cys74 and Cys80
that contribute to intersubunit disfulfide covalent cross-linking
were converted to isosteric but nonreactive Ser. Tfm was incorporated
into protein as for Qβ-F to generate named Qβ-K16Tfm-C74S-C80S
(named Qβ-CS, Figure S4). Pleasingly,
Qβ-CS still formed discrete particles, even without disulfide
bonds at C74 and C80 (Figure S2), consistent
with prior studies that have identified the dominant contribution
of noncovalent interactions between viral subunits.[34] The relative robustness of these Qβ-CS VLPs was probed
with 19F-NMR: in contrast to Qβ-F, Qβ-CS VLPs
disassembled directly into monomers under denaturing conditions when
treated only with SDS (Figure c), consistent with our intended design. The chemical shifts
of Qβ-CS VLPs in the absence and presence of SDS were highly
similar (−40.63 ppm, FWHH = ∼200 Hz; −40.88 ppm,
FWHH = ∼6 Hz, respectively) to those observed for Qβ
(Figure b). Reductant
DTT alone had negligible effect.We further characterized multimer
and monomers using 19F diffusion NMR (Figure and Figure
S5).[35] Despite their similar chemical
shifts in 1D 19F-NMR spectra, their diffusion coefficients
were different. Notably,
adding DTT in addition to SDS to the solution resulted in an increase
in diffusion coefficient, consistent with destabilizing subassemblies,
and the value from [Qβ-F]+SDS+DTT was essentially identical
to that from [Qβ-CS]+SDS, as expected, as well as Qβ-F
monomer prevented from disulfide formation by Cys-alkylation (Table S1). Diffusion coefficients for the full
particle were challenging to measure owing to the very large R2 of the resonance (Figure a and Figure S5). The values
obtained were significantly smaller than measured for degraded assemblies
(in the presence of SDS and DTT) but larger than expected for full
size particle, suggesting that they stem from high order multimers
only observed in the presence of intact particles, thereby allowing
us to monitor assembly state of the VLPs.
Figure 3
I/I0 versus gradient
strength of various Qβ species. Diffusion coefficients were
calculated using TopSpin and normalized according to TFA reference
to eliminate environmental or solvent effects (Table S1).
I/I0 versus gradient
strength of various Qβ species. Diffusion coefficients were
calculated using TopSpin and normalized according to TFA reference
to eliminate environmental or solvent effects (Table S1).Importantly, this validation
of particle disassembly states also
allowed us to determine the extent of particle dissociation and to
test putative disassembly pathways. Thus, gradual titration of Qβ-F
with SDS led to a gradual diminution in the intensity of the broad
particle peak (δF −40.7 ppm) with simultaneous
emergence in intensity of the peak ascribed to disassembled species
(Figure S6). Interestingly, this suggests
that the mechanism of disassembly in the presence of denaturant is
not a cooperative catastrophic collapse but a gradual drift in population
in response to environmental stress.Next, we tested this ability
to monitor particle state in a biological
context (Figure a).
Qβ-F VLPs were introduced to a range of representative mammalian
cell types: A549 epithelial cells, THP-1 monocytes, and THP-1-derived
macrophages. Flow cytometry (Figure S9)
and confocal microscopy (Figure S10), following
chemical, fluorescent, surface-labeling (Figures
S7–S9), revealed that only THP-1-derived macrophages
readily engulfed VLPs (Figure b,c). Confocal fluorescence microscopy confirmed internalization
(Figure d and Figure S11); observations after 20 min suggested
entry via an endosomal pathway (Figure S12).
Figure 4
(a) Multimodal tracking of VLP response to cells. VLPs were screened
for both internalization and stability to corresponding internal cellular
fluid (lysate) using combined fluorescent and 19F-labeling.
(b) Flow cytometry determined efficiency of mammalian cell internalization
of Qβ-F VLPs. (c) FACS histograms for internalization of Qβ-F
and mannose-decorated Qβ-F VLPs into macrophage cells after
24 h incubation. (d) Microscopy of macrophage with fluorescein-labeled
Qβ-F or Qβ-CS VLPs after 20 min of incubation.
(a) Multimodal tracking of VLP response to cells. VLPs were screened
for both internalization and stability to corresponding internal cellular
fluid (lysate) using combined fluorescent and 19F-labeling.
(b) Flow cytometry determined efficiency of mammalian cell internalization
of Qβ-F VLPs. (c) FACS histograms for internalization of Qβ-F
and mannose-decorated Qβ-F VLPs into macrophage cells after
24 h incubation. (d) Microscopy of macrophage with fluorescein-labeled
Qβ-F or Qβ-CS VLPs after 20 min of incubation.To assess the more detailed behavior of VLPs in
the milieu of the
cell interior, we incubated VLPs with cell lysates and probed their
behavior by 19F-NMR. In addition to the internalization
by THP-1-derived macrophages discovered here, E. coli is the natural host cell of Qβ virus; lysates from both “host”
cell types were therefore chosen (Figure a). In the viscous cellular environment,
it is expected that all 19F-NMR resonances would be broadened
due to macromolecular crowding.[36] Nonetheless,
we were still able to observe the broad resonance thereby allowing
monitoring of intact virus assemblies in both lysates, owing to the
particular suitability of the pairing of 19F NMR and our
system (Figure a and S13). Upon prolonged incubation at 37 °C,
a sharp peak with a shift of −40.95 ppm (FWHH = 9.9 Hz) appeared,
with increasing intensity over time. NMR measurements determined the
diffusion coefficient to be 3.0 × 10–10 m2 s–1 (Table S2), suggesting an even smaller species than those found previously.
This was confirmed upon additional chemical denaturation (added SDS+DTT):
the resonance from this smaller species was readily discernible from
the disassembled species observed previously (Figure a and Figure S13). Together, these data suggest: (i) the formation of smaller (monomeric
or peptidic) Tfm-containing fragments of Qβ derived from lysate
(likely mediated by proteolysis) and (ii), importantly, that our developed
system can distinguish between intact particles, intervening multimeric
states and a further stage of disassembly (or degradation) generated
within complex milieu such as cell lysates.
Figure 5
(a) 19F-NMR
of Qβ-F incubated with E. coli lysate at 37 °C for 24 h (left), followed
by SDS+DTT treatment (right). (b) Decay curves of Qβ-F and Qβ-CS
VLPs in E. coli or macrophage cell
lysates.
(a) 19F-NMR
of Qβ-F incubated with E. coli lysate at 37 °C for 24 h (left), followed
by SDS+DTT treatment (right). (b) Decay curves of Qβ-F and Qβ-CS
VLPs in E. coli or macrophage cell
lysates.In turn, this system, vitally,
allowed us to analyze our designed
“flimsy” VLP system Qβ-CS. Comparison of the degradation
processes of Qβ-F and Qβ-CS revealed a significantly shorter
half-life for Qβ-CS in both lysate systems (Figure b), consistent with in vitro
data and with the designed removal of disulfide bonds mediated by
Cys74 and Cys80. Interestingly, whereas both Qβ-F and Qβ-CS
were disassembled by E. coli, only
the more stable Qβ-F was not significantly disassembled by the
macrophage cells. Consistent with these observations, VLP-derived
peptides were directly identified by MS/MS; time course analyses revealed
formation (including Tfm-containing peptides) and further digestion
into fragments. Notably, more peptides were observed from “weakened”
Qβ-CS in both E. coli and macrophage
(Figures S17–S19).Finally,
to illustrate the potential of these VLP platforms for
further elaboration, we tuned their cellular uptake. Chemical-modification
with putative ligands for cell-surface receptors as “cell-targeting”
groups allowed a proof-of-principle of such further adaptation. Thus,
we extended the tropism of Qβ-F VLPs from E.
coli and macrophages toward other cells through surface
chemical-attachment[37] of d-mannosyl
residues; these alterations increased uptake of VLPs by THP-1 monocytes
(Figures S14 and S15).In summary,
we have established a system for monitoring the disassembly
of VLPs using 19F-NMR (see Figure S16 for further discussion) that is applicable even in complex biological
milieu. Successful application to design, tested here in such “real”
systems, suggests its potential application in yet more complex, e.g.,
in vivo systems. We have also shown here the potential for dual (fluorophore
and 19F)-labeling and corresponding dual-mode interrogation
as well as combination with chemical-modification “cell-targeting”
methods. We postulate that the strategy of designed, mechanistically
verified alteration of Qβ VLPs shown here might serve as an
example methodological workflow for functional design of other future,
designed viral, VLP and/or biological nanoparticle systems. Notably,
it has been suggested[38] that antibacterial
phage strategies may benefit from novel mutant phages, including designed
variants such as those that we have explored here. We have shown that
a form of cell-selectivity (E. coli vs macrophage) may be engineered here, allowing possible application
to target, e.g., intramacrophage bacteria; future experiments will
explore this and related potential.
Authors: Thibaut Crepin; Emmanuelle Schmitt; Yves Mechulam; Peter B Sampson; Mark D Vaughan; John F Honek; Sylvain Blanquet Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2003-09-05 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Melanie Brasch; Andrés de la Escosura; Yujie Ma; Charlotte Uetrecht; Albert J R Heck; Tomás Torres; Jeroen J L M Cornelissen Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Nicole F Steinmetz; Vu Hong; Erik D Spoerke; Ping Lu; Kurt Breitenkamp; M G Finn; Marianne Manchester Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jason D Fiedler; Cody Higginson; Marisa L Hovlid; Alexander A Kislukhin; Alexandra Castillejos; Florian Manzenrieder; Melody G Campbell; Neil R Voss; Clinton S Potter; Bridget Carragher; M G Finn Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Renato Ribeiro-Viana; Macarena Sánchez-Navarro; Joanna Luczkowiak; Julia R Koeppe; Rafael Delgado; Javier Rojo; Benjamin G Davis Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2012 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mateusz Imiołek; Gogulan Karunanithy; Wai-Lung Ng; Andrew J Baldwin; Véronique Gouverneur; Benjamin G Davis Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jorge L Mejía-Méndez; Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt; Luis R Hernández; Eugenio Sánchez-Arreola; Horacio Bach Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Swarupa Chatterjee; Robert Molenaar; Wiebe M de Vos; Hendrik D W Roesink; R Martijn Wagterveld; Jeroen J L M Cornelissen; Mireille M A E Claessens; Christian Blum Journal: ACS Appl Polym Mater Date: 2022-06-27