Literature DB >> 18279910

Mass-removal and mass-flux-reduction behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid.

M L Brusseau1, E L Difilippo, J C Marble, M Oostrom.   

Abstract

A series of flow-cell experiments was conducted to investigate aqueous dissolution and mass-removal behavior for systems wherein immiscible liquid was non-uniformly distributed in physically heterogeneous source zones. The study focused specifically on characterizing the relationship between mass flux reduction and mass removal for systems for which immiscible liquid is poorly accessible to flowing water. Two idealized scenarios were examined, one wherein immiscible liquid at residual saturation exists within a lower-permeability unit residing in a higher-permeability matrix, and one wherein immiscible liquid at higher saturation (a pool) exists within a higher-permeability unit adjacent to a lower-permeability unit. The results showed that significant reductions in mass flux occurred at relatively moderate mass-removal fractions for all systems. Conversely, minimal mass flux reduction occurred until a relatively large fraction of mass (>80%) was removed for the control experiment, which was designed to exhibit ideal mass removal. In general, mass flux reduction was observed to follow an approximately one-to-one relationship with mass removal. Two methods for estimating mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior, one based on system-indicator parameters (ganglia-to-pool ratio) and the other a simple mass-removal function, were used to evaluate the measured data. The results of this study illustrate the impact of poorly accessible immiscible liquid on mass-removal and mass-flux processes, and the difficulties posed for estimating mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18279910      PMCID: PMC2864070          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  8 in total

1.  Predicting impacts of ground water contamination.

Authors:  M D Einarson; D M Mackay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach.

Authors:  K Soga; J W E Page; T H Illangasekare
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; N T Nelson; Z Zhang; J E Blue; J Rohrer; T Allen
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 4.  DNAPL source depletion: linking architecture and flux response.

Authors:  Adrian D Fure; James W Jawitz; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Dissolution of nonuniformly distributed immiscible liquid: intermediate-scale experiments and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Zhihui Zhang; Nicole T Nelson; R Brent Cain; Geoffrey R Tick; Mart Oostrom
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Reductions in contaminant mass discharge following partial mass removal from DNAPL source zones.

Authors:  Eric J Suchomel; Kurt D Pennell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced solubilization of DNAPL at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.

Authors:  Jeffrey Childs; Edgar Acosta; Michael D Annable; Michael C Brooks; Carl G Enfield; Jeffrey H Harwell; Mark Hasegawa; Robert C Knox; P Suresh C Rao; David A Sabatini; Ben Shiau; Erika Szekeres; A Lynn Wood
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Controlled release, blind test of DNAPL remediation by ethanol flushing.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; Michael D Annable; P Suresh C Rao; Kirk Hatfield; James W Jawitz; William R Wise; A Lynn Wood; Carl G Enfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.188

  8 in total
  21 in total

1.  Application of Light Reflection Visualization for Measuring Organic-Liquid Saturation for Two-Phase Systems in Two-Dimensional Flow Cells.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  Relationship between mass-flux reduction and source-zone mass removal: analysis of field data.

Authors:  Erica L Difilippo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Application of a lumped-process mathematical model to dissolution of non-uniformly distributed immiscible liquid in heterogeneous porous media.

Authors:  J C Marble; E L DiFilippo; Z Zhang; G R Tick; M L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Impact of enhanced-flushing reagents and organic-liquid distribution on mass removal and mass-discharge reduction.

Authors:  Nihat Hakan Akyol; Ann Russo Lee; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  An empirical model for the evaluation of the dissolution rate from a DNAPL-contaminated area.

Authors:  Antonella Luciano; Giuseppe Mancini; Vincenzo Torretta; Paolo Viotti
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Use of Historical Pump-and-Treat Data to Enhance Site Characterization and Remediation Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  Dissolution, cyclodextrin-enhanced solubilization, and mass removal of an ideal multicomponent organic liquid.

Authors:  Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.565

10.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.