Literature DB >> 28341932

[Cross-sectional field pain medicine Q14 - the Mainz model : Development of the pain medicine curriculum in the standard study course at the University Medical School of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz].

S Kurz1,2, H Buggenhagen3,4, R Schwab3, R Laufenberg-Feldmann3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Following the amendment of the Medical Licensure Act (ÄAppO) in 2012, pain medicine was introduced as a mandatory subject for students during undergraduate medical training. Medical schools were required to define and to implement adequate curricular and formal teaching structures based on interdisciplinary and multiprofessional requirements according to the curriculum for pain medicine of the German Pain Society. These aspects were considered in the new interdisciplinary curriculum for pain medicine, the so-called Mainz model. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A new curriculum based on the Kern cycle was developed and implemented at the Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz. Different teaching methods (lectures, interprofessional tutorials and bedside coaching in small groups) were used to impart professional expertise in pain medicine to medical students in an interdisciplinary clinical context.
RESULTS: The new curriculum was put into practice and evaluated starting from the winter semester 2014/2015. Before and after the first implementation, medical students were asked about the relevance of pain medicine and their perception of personal competence.
CONCLUSION: The interdisciplinary course in pain medicine was successfully introduced into the degree program based on the curriculum of the German Pain Society and the Kern cycle. With educational support, interdepartmental and multiprofessional collaboration the process of implementation of new interdisciplinary courses can be facilitated. In the future, the question how to increase the amount of practical lessons without increasing the load on teaching resources has to be resolved. Blended learning modules, such as a combination of E‑learning and practical lessons are currently being studied in smaller cohorts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-sectional field of pain medicine; Curriculum; Interdisciplinary teaching; Interprofessional teaching; Kern cycle; Pain medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28341932     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-017-0210-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  13 in total

1.  Postgraduate training in anaesthesiology, pain and intensive care: the new European competence-based guidelines.

Authors:  Elisabeth Van Gessel; Jannicke Mellin-Olsen; Helle T Østergaard; Leila Niemi-Murola
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  [Teaching with pain].

Authors:  M Dusch; C Quandt
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Pain education in North American medical schools.

Authors:  Lina Mezei; Beth B Murinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Current challenges in pain education.

Authors:  Judy Watt-Watson; Beth B Murinson
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2013-09

Review 5.  Acute pain in undergraduate medical education: an unfinished chapter!

Authors:  Nalini Vadivelu; Sukanya Mitra; Roberta Hines; Maxwell Elia; Richard W Rosenquist
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  [Pain medicine as a cross-sectional subject in German medical schools. An opportunity for general pain management].

Authors:  A Kopf; M Dusch; B Alt-Epping; F Petzke; R-D Treede
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  [Cross-sectional field 14 pain medicine. Implementation of the German Pain Society (DGSS) core curriculum in the model study course MaReCuM].

Authors:  M Dusch; J Benrath; J Fischer; M Schmelz; H Fritz; H Klüter; M Thiel; R D Treede
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  [Medical educational evaluation of the German Pain Congress 2012. In the context of the CanMEDS physician competency framework].

Authors:  M Dusch; A-K Bräscher; A Kopf; R D Treede; J Benrath
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Implementation of palliative care as a mandatory cross-disciplinary subject (QB13) at the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.

Authors:  Christian Schulz; Ursula Wenzel-Meyburg; André Karger; Alexandra Scherg; Jürgen In der Schmitten; Thorsten Trapp; Andreas Paling; Simone Bakus; Gesa Schatte; Eva Rudolf; Ulrich Decking; Stephanie Ritz-Timme; Matthias Grünewald; Andrea Schmitz
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2015-02-11

Review 10.  The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks.

Authors:  Stefanie C Hautz; Wolf E Hautz; Niklas Keller; Markus A Feufel; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving competence and safety in pain medicine: a practical clinical teaching strategy for students combining simulation and bedside teaching.

Authors:  Sandra Kurz; Jana Lohse; Holger Buggenhagen; Irene Schmidtmann; Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann; Kristin Engelhard
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  [The cross-sectional field "pain medicine" in medical studies at the University of Leipzig-What has been achieved? : An analysis of self-estimation of students before, during and 5 years after establishment of the cross-sectional field].

Authors:  Gunther Hempel; Andreas Weissenbacher; Diana Becker-Rux; Swantje Mescha; Sebastian N Stehr; Robert Werdehausen
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.629

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.