Literature DB >> 31506392

Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.

Joanna Gotfrit1, John J W Shin2, Ranjeeta Mallick3, David J Stewart1,3, Paul Wheatley-Price1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Canada has an established publicly funded health care system with a complex drug approval and funding process. After proof of efficacy (POE; key publication/presentation) and before becoming publicly accessible, each drug undergoes a Health Canada approval process, a health technology assessment (HTA), a pricing negotiation, and finally individual provincial funding agreements. We quantified potential life-years lost during this process.
METHODS: We analyzed drugs for advanced lung, breast, and colorectal cancer that underwent the HTA process between 2011 and 2016. Life-years lost were calculated by multiplying documented improvement in progression-free and overall survival, number of eligible patients, and time from POE to first public funding. For conservative calculation, we assumed all eligible patients in Canada had access at the time of first public funding, whereas in reality provinces fund at different time points.
RESULTS: We analyzed 21 drugs. Of these, 15 have been funded publicly. The time from POE to first public funding ranged from 14.0 to 99.2 months (median 26.6 months). Total overall life-years lost from POE to first public funding were 39,067 (lung 32,367; breast 6,691). Progression-free life-years lost from POE to first public funding were 48,037 (lung 9,139, breast 15,827, colorectal 23,071).
CONCLUSION: The number of potential life-years lost during the drug regulatory and funding process in Canada is substantial, largely driven by delays to funding of colorectal cancer drugs. Recognizing that interprovincial differences exist and that eligible patients may not all receive a given drug, if even a fraction does so, the impact of delays remains substantive. Collaborative national initiatives are required to address this major barrier to treatment access. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients may spend lengthy periods of time awaiting access to new and effective cancer drugs. Patients with private drug insurance or personal funds or who reside in certain Canadian provinces may obtain some drugs sooner than others, potentially creating a two-tiered access system. The cancer drug access and public funding system must be expedited to improve equity. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access; Drugs; Funding; Medical oncology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31506392      PMCID: PMC6964142          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  45 in total

1.  Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Javier Cortés; Sung-Bae Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Roberto Hegg; Young-Hyuck Im; Laslo Roman; José Luiz Pedrini; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Adam Knott; Emma Clark; Mark C Benyunes; Graham Ross; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Canadian, European and United States new drug approval times now relatively similar.

Authors:  Nigel S B Rawson
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study.

Authors:  Richard S Finn; John P Crown; Istvan Lang; Katalin Boer; Igor M Bondarenko; Sergey O Kulyk; Johannes Ettl; Ravindranath Patel; Tamas Pinter; Marcus Schmidt; Yaroslav Shparyk; Anu R Thummala; Nataliya L Voytko; Camilla Fowst; Xin Huang; Sindy T Kim; Sophia Randolph; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Julie Brahmer; Karen L Reckamp; Paul Baas; Lucio Crinò; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Elena Poddubskaya; Scott Antonia; Adam Pluzanski; Everett E Vokes; Esther Holgado; David Waterhouse; Neal Ready; Justin Gainor; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Libor Havel; Martin Steins; Marina C Garassino; Joachim G Aerts; Manuel Domine; Luis Paz-Ares; Martin Reck; Christine Baudelet; Christopher T Harbison; Brian Lestini; David R Spigel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin J Solomon; Tony Mok; Dong-Wan Kim; Yi-Long Wu; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Tarek Mekhail; Enriqueta Felip; Federico Cappuzzo; Jolanda Paolini; Tiziana Usari; Shrividya Iyer; Arlene Reisman; Keith D Wilner; Jennifer Tursi; Fiona Blackhall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Is progression-free survival associated with a better health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer? Evidence from two randomised trials with afatinib.

Authors:  Ingolf Griebsch; Michael Palmer; Peter M Fayers; Stuart Ellis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  8 in total

1.  Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand.

Authors:  David J Stewart; John-Peter Bradford; Gerald Batist
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Canadian Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment for Malignant Hematology and Oncology Indications Compared With the US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval Program.

Authors:  Cheryl Ho; Howard J Lim; Dean A Regier
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

3.  FDA Accelerated Approval for Malignant Hematology and Oncology Indications in the Canadian Environment.

Authors:  Cheryl Ho; Howard J Lim; Dean A Regier
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  The Pathway for New Cancer Drug Access in Canada.

Authors:  Joanna Gotfrit; William Dempster; Johanne Chambers; Paul Wheatley-Price
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Access Denied? The Unintended Consequences of Pending Drug Pricing Rules.

Authors:  Alan Kaplan; David J Stewart; Gerald Batist; Silvana Spadafora; Sandeep Sehdev; Shaun G Goodman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Not All Canadian Cancer Patients Are Equal-Disparities in Public Cancer Drug Funding across Canada.

Authors:  Ceilidh MacPhail; Stephanie Snow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.

Authors:  Joanna Gotfrit; Ashley Jackson; John J W Shin; David J Stewart; Ranjeeta Mallick; Paul Wheatley-Price
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Is It Time to Commit to a Process to Re-Evaluate Oncology Drugs? A Descriptive Analysis of Systemic Therapies for Solid Tumour Indications Reviewed in Canada from 2017 to 2021.

Authors:  Sandeep Sehdev; Alexandra Chambers
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.