Literature DB >> 28335018

Dissecting gamma frequency activity during human memory processing.

Michal T Kucewicz1,2, Brent M Berry1,2, Vaclav Kremen1,2,3, Benjamin H Brinkmann1,2, Michael R Sperling4, Barbara C Jobst5, Robert E Gross6, Bradley Lega7, Sameer A Sheth8, Joel M Stein9, Sandthitsu R Das1, Richard Gorniak10, S Matthew Stead1,2, Daniel S Rizzuto11, Michael J Kahana11, Gregory A Worrell1,2.   

Abstract

Gamma frequency activity (30-150 Hz) is induced in cognitive tasks and is thought to reflect underlying neural processes. Gamma frequency activity can be recorded directly from the human brain using intracranial electrodes implanted in patients undergoing treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Previous studies have independently explored narrowband oscillations in the local field potential and broadband power increases. It is not clear, however, which processes contribute to human brain gamma frequency activity, or their dynamics and roles during memory processing. Here a large dataset of intracranial recordings obtained during encoding of words from 101 patients was used to detect, characterize and compare induced gamma frequency activity events. Individual bursts of gamma frequency activity were isolated in the time-frequency domain to determine their spectral features, including peak frequency, amplitude, frequency span, and duration. We found two distinct types of gamma frequency activity events that showed either narrowband or broadband frequency spans revealing characteristic spectral properties. Narrowband events, the predominant type, were induced by word presentations following an initial induction of broadband events, which were temporally separated and selectively correlated with evoked response potentials, suggesting that they reflect different neural activities and play different roles during memory encoding. The two gamma frequency activity types were differentially modulated during encoding of subsequently recalled and forgotten words. In conclusion, we found evidence for two distinct activity types induced in the gamma frequency range during cognitive processing. Separating these two gamma frequency activity components contributes to the current understanding of electrophysiological biomarkers, and may prove useful for emerging neurotechnologies targeting, mapping and modulating distinct neurophysiological processes in normal and epileptogenic brain.
© The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECoG; evoked response potential; gamma oscillations; intracranial EEG; neuronal ensembles

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28335018     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  32 in total

1.  Integrating artificial intelligence with real-time intracranial EEG monitoring to automate interictal identification of seizure onset zones in focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Yogatheesan Varatharajah; Brent Berry; Jan Cimbalnik; Vaclav Kremen; Jamie Van Gompel; Matt Stead; Benjamin Brinkmann; Ravishankar Iyer; Gregory Worrell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Ripple oscillations in the left temporal neocortex are associated with impaired verbal episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Zachary J Waldman; Liliana Camarillo-Rodriguez; Inna Chervenova; Brent Berry; Shoichi Shimamoto; Bahareh Elahian; Michal Kucewicz; Chaitanya Ganne; Xiao-Song He; Leon A Davis; Joel Stein; Sandhitsu Das; Richard Gorniak; Ashwini D Sharan; Robert Gross; Cory S Inman; Bradley C Lega; Kareem Zaghloul; Barbara C Jobst; Katheryn A Davis; Paul Wanda; Mehraneh Khadjevand; Joseph Tracy; Daniel S Rizzuto; Gregory Worrell; Michael Sperling; Shennan A Weiss
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.937

3.  Hippocampal CA1 gamma power predicts the precision of spatial memory judgments.

Authors:  Rebecca F Stevenson; Jie Zheng; Lilit Mnatsakanyan; Sumeet Vadera; Robert T Knight; Jack J Lin; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Working Memory: Delay Activity, Yes! Persistent Activity? Maybe Not.

Authors:  Mikael Lundqvist; Pawel Herman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity.

Authors:  Uma R Mohan; Andrew J Watrous; Jonathan F Miller; Bradley C Lega; Michael R Sperling; Gregory A Worrell; Robert E Gross; Kareem A Zaghloul; Barbara C Jobst; Kathryn A Davis; Sameer A Sheth; Joel M Stein; Sandhitsu R Das; Richard Gorniak; Paul A Wanda; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Prefrontal high gamma during a magnetoencephalographic working memory task.

Authors:  Frederick W Carver; Dani Y Rubinstein; Alan H Gerlich; Samantha I Fradkin; Tom Holroyd; Richard Coppola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Progress and Remaining Challenges in the Application of High Frequency Oscillations as Biomarkers of Epileptic Brain.

Authors:  Fatemeh Khadjevand; Jan Cimbalnik; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-22

8.  Dynamic tractography: Integrating cortico-cortical evoked potentials and diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Brian H Silverstein; Eishi Asano; Ayaka Sugiura; Masaki Sonoda; Min-Hee Lee; Jeong-Won Jeong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Working Memory 2.0.

Authors:  Earl K Miller; Mikael Lundqvist; André M Bastos
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Tonic Resting State Hubness Supports High Gamma Activity Defined Verbal Memory Encoding Network in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Ganne Chaitanya; Walter Hinds; James Kragel; Xiaosong He; Noah Sideman; Youssef Ezzyat; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Joseph I Tracy
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.