OBJECTIVE: An ability to map seizure-generating brain tissue, i.e. the seizure onset zone (SOZ), without recording actual seizures could reduce the duration of invasive EEG monitoring for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. A widely-adopted practice in the literature is to compare the incidence (events/time) of putative pathological electrophysiological biomarkers associated with epileptic brain tissue with the SOZ determined from spontaneous seizures recorded with intracranial EEG, primarily using a single biomarker. Clinical translation of the previous efforts suffers from their inability to generalize across multiple patients because of (a) the inter-patient variability and (b) the temporal variability in the epileptogenic activity. APPROACH: Here, we report an artificial intelligence-based approach for combining multiple interictal electrophysiological biomarkers and their temporal characteristics as a way of accounting for the above barriers and show that it can reliably identify seizure onset zones in a study cohort of 82 patients who underwent evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. MAIN RESULTS: Our investigation provides evidence that utilizing the complementary information provided by multiple electrophysiological biomarkers and their temporal characteristics can significantly improve the localization potential compared to previously published single-biomarker incidence-based approaches, resulting in an average area under ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.73 in a cohort of 82 patients. Our results also suggest that recording durations between 90 min and 2 h are sufficient to localize SOZs with accuracies that may prove clinically relevant. SIGNIFICANCE: The successful validation of our approach on a large cohort of 82 patients warrants future investigation on the feasibility of utilizing intra-operative EEG monitoring and artificial intelligence to localize epileptogenic brain tissue. Broadly, our study demonstrates the use of artificial intelligence coupled with careful feature engineering in augmenting clinical decision making.
OBJECTIVE: An ability to map seizure-generating brain tissue, i.e. the seizure onset zone (SOZ), without recording actual seizures could reduce the duration of invasive EEG monitoring for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. A widely-adopted practice in the literature is to compare the incidence (events/time) of putative pathological electrophysiological biomarkers associated with epileptic brain tissue with the SOZ determined from spontaneous seizures recorded with intracranial EEG, primarily using a single biomarker. Clinical translation of the previous efforts suffers from their inability to generalize across multiple patients because of (a) the inter-patient variability and (b) the temporal variability in the epileptogenic activity. APPROACH: Here, we report an artificial intelligence-based approach for combining multiple interictal electrophysiological biomarkers and their temporal characteristics as a way of accounting for the above barriers and show that it can reliably identify seizure onset zones in a study cohort of 82 patients who underwent evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. MAIN RESULTS: Our investigation provides evidence that utilizing the complementary information provided by multiple electrophysiological biomarkers and their temporal characteristics can significantly improve the localization potential compared to previously published single-biomarker incidence-based approaches, resulting in an average area under ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.73 in a cohort of 82 patients. Our results also suggest that recording durations between 90 min and 2 h are sufficient to localize SOZs with accuracies that may prove clinically relevant. SIGNIFICANCE: The successful validation of our approach on a large cohort of 82 patients warrants future investigation on the feasibility of utilizing intra-operative EEG monitoring and artificial intelligence to localize epileptogenic brain tissue. Broadly, our study demonstrates the use of artificial intelligence coupled with careful feature engineering in augmenting clinical decision making.
Authors: Jörg Wellmer; Ferdinand von der Groeben; Ute Klarmann; Christian Weber; Christian E Elger; Horst Urbach; Hans Clusmann; Marec von Lehe Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jerome Engel; Asla Pitkänen; Jeffrey A Loeb; F Edward Dudek; Edward H Bertram; Andrew J Cole; Solomon L Moshé; Samuel Wiebe; Frances E Jensen; Istvan Mody; Astrid Nehlig; Annamaria Vezzani Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Julia Jacobs; Maeike Zijlmans; Rina Zelmann; Claude-Edouard Chatillon; Jeffrey Hall; André Olivier; François Dubeau; Jean Gotman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ryan T Canolty; Charles F Cadieu; Kilian Koepsell; Robert T Knight; Jose M Carmena Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Nishant Sinha; Justin Dauwels; Marcus Kaiser; Sydney S Cash; M Brandon Westover; Yujiang Wang; Peter N Taylor Journal: Brain Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Yvonne Höller; Raoul Kutil; Lukas Klaffenböck; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Peter M Höller; Arne C Bathke; Julia Jacobs; Alexandra C Taylor; Raffaele Nardone; Eugen Trinka Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jan Cimbalnik; Petr Klimes; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Pavel Jurak; Martin Pail; Robert Roman; Pavel Daniel; Hari Guragain; Benjamin Brinkmann; Milan Brazdil; Greg Worrell Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Krishnakant V Saboo; Irena Balzekas; Vaclav Kremen; Yogatheesan Varatharajah; Michal Kucewicz; Ravishankar K Iyer; Gregory A Worrell Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2021-09-18 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jian Li; Olesya Grinenko; John C Mosher; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Richard M Leahy; Patrick Chauvel Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sharon Chiang; Rosalind W Picard; Winston Chiong; Robert Moss; Gregory A Worrell; Vikram R Rao; Daniel M Goldenholz Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 11.800