| Literature DB >> 28330953 |
Wenche Jørgensen1, Kasper A Rud1, Ole H Mortensen1, Lis Frandsen1, Niels Grunnet1, Bjørn Quistorff2.
Abstract
Extreme diets consisting of either high fat (HF) or high sucrose (HS) may lead to insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, often associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. However, it is not known if these diets alter normal interactions of pyruvate and fatty acid oxidation at the level of the mitochondria. Here, we report that rat muscle mitochondria does show the normal Randle-type fat-carbohydrate interaction seen in vivo. The mechanism behind this metabolic flexibility at the level of the isolated mitochondria is a regulation of the flux-ratio: pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH)/β-oxidation to suit the actual substrate availability, with the PDH flux as the major point of regulation. We further report that this regulatory mechanism of carbohydrate-fat metabolic interaction surprisingly is lost in mitochondria obtained from animals exposed for 12 weeks to a HF- or a HS diet as compared to rats given a normal chow diet. The mechanism seems to be a loss of the PDH flux decrease seen in controls, when fatty acid is supplied as substrate in addition to pyruvate, and vice versa for the supply of pyruvate as substrate to mitochondria oxidizing fatty acid. Finally, we report that the calculated TCA flux in the isolated mitochondria under these circumstances shows a significant reduction (~50%) after the HF diet and an even larger reduction (~75%) after the HS diet, compared with the chow group. Thus, it appears that obesogenic diets as those applied here have major influence on key metabolic performance of skeletal muscle mitochondria.Entities:
Keywords: High fat feeding; PDH‐P; PDH‐flux; Randle glucose‐fatty‐acid‐cycle; TCA‐flux; high sucrose feeding; metabolic flexibility; pyruvate dehydrogenase; skeletal muscle mitochondria; substrate choice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28330953 PMCID: PMC5371568 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1Oral glucose tolerance test. Oral glucose tolerance test is depicted as plasma glucose concentration and as area under the curve (inserted bar graph). Groups are defined by progeny diet. Calculations were performed with 0 mmol plasma glucose per liter as baseline and values in the bar graph are mean ± SD, n = 5–6. *Denotes significance with respect to chow, P < 0.05.
Oxygen consumption in isolated mitochondria of rat quadriceps muscle
| Progeny diet | Chow | HS | HF |
|---|---|---|---|
| State 4 | |||
| Pyr | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 1.0 |
| PC | 10.7 ± 1.0 | 5.3 ± 2.9 | 7.5 ± 1.3 |
| Pyr + PC | 12.6 ± 1.1 | 5.3 ± 1.8 | 8.7 ± 3.7 |
| State 3 | |||
| Pyr | 200 ± 24 | 77.2 ± 25 | 129 ± 36 |
| PC | 97.6 ± 7.5 | 63.2 ± 24 | 85.3 ± 26 |
| Pyr + PC | 224 ± 19 | 102 ± 26 | 156 ± 56 |
| VO2 max | |||
| Pyr + succ | 256 ± 32 | 116 ± 26 | 173 ± 47 |
| PC + succ | 143 ± 11 | 71.6 ± 24 | 114 ± 37 |
| Pyr + PC + succ | 277 ± 24 | 134 ± 33 | 200 ± 68 |
| RCR | |||
| Pyr | 21.6 ± 2.6 | 32.9 ± 9.0 | 27.0 ± 9.7 |
| PC | 9.19 ± 1.5 | 9.11 ± 6.6 | 11.5 ± 3.3 |
| Pyr + PC | 18.0 ± 2.9 | 18.7 ± 9.3 | 18.3 ± 2.1 |
Groups are defined by the progeny diet, that is, standard chow (Chow), high sucrose (HS) and high fat (HF) for 12 weeks after weaning. Values are given as mean ± SD (n = 5–8) (nmol/[min × mg mitochondrial protein]).
Significantly different from Chow, P < 0.05.
Significant difference between HF and HS, P < 0.05 and
P < 0.1.
Significantly different from the corresponding state 3 oxygen uptake, P < 0.01.
Oxidation rates of [1‐14C]‐pyruvate and [1‐14C]‐palmitoyl carnitine in isolated mitochondria from rat quadriceps muscle
| Progeny diet | Chow | HS | HF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substrate oxidation | |||
| Pyruvate oxidation | 93.4 ± 15 | 48.2 ± 10 | 61..2 ± 9.7 |
| Pyruvate oxidation in the presence of PC | 68.2 ± 17 | 44.6 ± 8.3 | 60.6 ± 5.3 |
| PC oxidation | 3.53 ± 1.1 | 2.84 ± 1.3 | 3.26 ± 0.78 |
| PC oxidation in the presence of pyruvate | 2.89 ± 0.80 | 2.71 ± 1.2 | 2.73 ± 0.97 |
Groups are defined by the progeny diet, that is, standard chow (Chow), high sucrose (HS) and high fat (HF) after weaning. Values are mean ± SD (n = 5–8) (nmol substrate/mg protein/min).
Significantly different from Chow.
Significant difference between pyruvate and pyruvate + PC.
Significantly different from HS.
Significant difference between PC and PC + pyruvate.
Figure 2Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) flux versus PDH and PDK4 protein level and PDH phosphorylation in isolated mitochondria from rat skeletal muscle. (A) Total PDH (PDH1Eα). (B) Degree of PDH phosphorylation (PDH‐P/PDH). (C) Level of Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4). (D) The ratio (PDH oxidation rate(/(β‐oxidation rate). All Western blotting data are given in arbitrary units.
Figure 3The ratio pyruvate oxidation/β‐oxidation rate versus the relative amount of PDH‐P (Fig. 3A) and the PDK4 level (Fig. 3B), as measured in isolated mitochondria from rat quadriceps muscle. Values are means ± SEM, n = 5–6.
Figure 4β‐oxidation rate versus total PDH level as measured in isolated mitochondria from rat quadriceps muscle. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 5–6.
Figure 5Calculated TCA cycle flux in isolated rat quadriceps mitochondria. Mitochondria were isolated from the quadriceps muscles of the three groups of rats (chow, HS and HF rats) as described in Methods. The three experimental groups are indicated on top of each column in the figure, and the substrate(s) are given to the left of each row. The calculated numbers for TCA input are pyruvate dehydrogenase flux and β‐oxidation flux as applicable, and were taken from Table 2. The calculated TCA cycle flux (nmol acetyl‐CoA per mg mitochondrial protein per min) is indicated inside each circle, and represents complete oxidation of acetylCoA to carbon dioxide and water. This number was calculated as: ([total oxygen uptake − oxygen uptake needed for citrate formation]/1.5). Free acetylCoA is assumed to remain constant. Values of total oxygen uptake were taken from Table 1. Substrate oxidation not accounted for by complete oxidation in the TCA cycle is indicated by numbers to the right of each circle, and is given in the same unit as the TCA flux (nmol acetyl‐CoA per mg protein per min). For the sake of clarity, the calculated numbers are given without SD. However, *Indicate significant differences found with respect to the chow group (P < 0.05).