| Literature DB >> 28533262 |
Kelsey H Collins1,2, David A Hart1,2,3,4, Ian C Smith1, Anthony M Issler1,5, Raylene A Reimer1,6, Ruth A Seerattan1, Jaqueline L Rios1,2,7, Walter Herzog1,2.
Abstract
The effects of obesity on different musculoskeletal tissues are not well understood. The glycolytic quadriceps muscles are compromised with obesity, but due to its high oxidative capacity, the soleus muscle may be protected against obesity-induced muscle damage. To determine the time-course relationship between a high-fat/high-sucrose (HFS) metabolic challenge and soleus muscle integrity, defined as intramuscular fat invasion, fibrosis and molecular alterations over six time points. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a HFS diet (n = 64) and killed at serial short-term (3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks, 28 weeks) time points. Chow-fed controls (n = 21) were killed at 4, 12, and 28 weeks. At sacrifice, animals were weighed, body composition was calculated (DXA), and soleus muscles were harvested and flash-frozen. Cytokine and adipokine mRNA levels for soleus muscles were assessed, using RT-qPCR Histological assessment of muscle fibrosis and intramuscular fat was conducted, CD68+ cell number was determined using immunohistochemistry, and fiber typing was assessed using myosin heavy chain protein analysis. HFS animals demonstrated significant increases in body fat by 1 week, and this increase in body fat was sustained through 28 weeks on the HFS diet. Short-term time-point soleus muscles demonstrated up-regulated mRNA levels for inflammation, atrophy, and oxidative stress molecules. However, intramuscular fat, fibrosis, and CD68+ cell number were similar to their respective control group at all time points evaluated. Therefore, the oxidative capacity of the soleus may be protective against diet-induced alterations to muscle integrity. Increasing oxidative capacity of muscles using aerobic exercise may be a beneficial strategy for mitigating obesity-induced muscle damage, and its consequences.Entities:
Keywords: Aerobic capacity; high‐fat/high‐sucrose diet; oxidative stress; rat model; soleus muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28533262 PMCID: PMC5449557 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1High‐fat high‐sucrose diet did not result in structural changes or increased CD68+ cell number in soleus muscle compared to chow‐fed control rats. (A) Top row: Oil Red O stainining for intramuscular lipid in soleus muscle sections taken at 100× magnification; middle row: Picrosirius red staining for collagen in soleus muscle sections, imaged at 100× magnification; bottom row: immunohistochemistry staining for CD68+ cells in soleus muscle sections, imaged at 200× magnification. White arrows demonstrate positive staining for CD68+ cells. (B) Raw average values for Oil Red O Staining for each animal, where 10–25 images were evaluated for a mid‐belly cross‐section. Black scale bar represents 100 μm, images were taken at 100× magnification. (C) Raw average values for Picrosirius red staining for each animal, where 10–25 images were evaluated for a mid‐belly cross‐section. Black scale bar represents 100 μm, images were taken at 100× magnification. (D) Raw average values for CD68+ staining for each animal, where 4 images were randomly selected and evaluated for a given mid‐belly cross‐section. White scale bars represent 100 μm, images were taken at 200× magnification.
Soleus Muscle Integrity is conserved across 12 and 28 weeks of high‐fat/high‐sucrose metabolic challenge compared to chow‐fed control animals
| Group | 12 weeks | 28 weeks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil red O % (lipid) | Picrosirius red % (fibrosis) | CD68+ cells (per 0.15 mm2 field of view) | Oil red O % (lipid) | Picrosirius red % (fibrosis) | CD68+ cells (per 0.15 mm2 field of view) | |
| DIO‐P | 0.4 ± 0.1% | 6.6 ± 0.5% | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1% | 8.0 ± 1.0% | 3.1 ± 0.4 |
| DIO‐R | 0.2 ± 0.06% | 7.6 ± 0.6% | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3% | 6.6 ± 1.0% | 2.7 ± 0.8 |
| Chow | 0.2 ± 0.04% | 5.9 ± 0.3% | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1% | 8.6 ± 1.0% | 2.9 ± 0.2 |
DIO, diet induced obesity.
Figure 2Myosin heavy chain (MHC) distribution was conserved in soleus muscles from chow‐fed control rats and high‐fat/high‐sucrose diets. (A) MHC distribution from animals on high‐fat/high‐sucrose (HFS) from 3 days to 4 weeks. (B), With tertile stratification into obesity prone and resistant groups as described in the methods (12 and 28 weeks pooled together obesity prone animals demonstrated a decreased proportion Myosin heavy chain (MHC) I, accompanied with an increase proportion of in MHC IIa. C) A sample gel is shown to demonstrate the separation between the four different MHC isoforms in chow‐fed control animals, obesity prone, and obesity resistant soleus.
Fluctuating, but significant changes in soleus muscle mRNA levels were observed, despite similarities in muscle structure with high‐fat/high‐sucrose diet
| Marker type | Factor | 3‐days fold‐change (SE) | 1‐week mean fold‐change (SE) | 2‐weeks fold‐change (SE) | 4‐weeks fold‐change (SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxidative Stress | iNOS | 21.5 ± 9.50 | 23.80 ± 22.59 | 74.00 ± 24.05 | 38.68 ± 14.55 |
| Oxidative stress scavenger | SOD2 | 1.61 ± 0.25 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 3.0 ± 0.64 | 2.28 ± 0.45 |
| Oxidative capacity | SDH | 1.54 ± 0.40 | 1.06 ± 0.10 | 3.61 ± 0.71 | 3.41 ± 0.64 |
| Pro‐inflammatory | COX‐2 | 125.22 ± 55.72 | 121.36 ± 120.35 | 419.53 ± 153.26 | 209.50 ± 73.27 |
| IL‐6 | 89.43 ± 38.06 | 15.50 ± 14.58 | 400.19 ± 100.13 | 197.59 ± 76.65 | |
| Leptin | 1.49 ± 0.82 | 0.55 ± 0.11 | 9.95 ± 5.40 | 2.41 ± 1.59 | |
| MCP‐1 | 1.27 ± 1.22 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.64 ± 0.11 | |
| TNF‐ | 1.93 ± 0.30 | 1.31 ± 0.43 | 2.55 ± 0.39 | 2.03 ± 0.85 | |
| Fat cell differentiation | PPARϒ | 2.16 ± 0.52 | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 3.59 ± 0.52 | 2.51 ± 0.72 |
| Atrophy | MuRF‐1 | 1.81 ± 0.47 | 2.76 ± 1.75 | 3.54 ± 1.79 | 2.75 ± 0.56 |
| MAFbx/atrogin‐1 | 1.18 ± 0.09 | 1.42 ± 0.56 | 1.99 ± 0.57 | 2.15 ± 0.57 |
No significant changes in mRNA levels for any markers were observed at 12 or 28 weeks of diet exposure.
Indicates P < 0.10 versus control.
Indicates P < 0.05 versus control.
indicates P < 0.01 versus control.
P < 0.001 versus control.