OBJECTIVES: Past research has reported an association between neighborhood disadvantage and healthy aging, but most of these studies utilize self-report measures of health or physical functioning and do not properly account for neighborhood selection effects, creating concerns regarding inflated associations. To overcome these limitations and provide a more stringent estimate of effects, the current study investigated the effect of neighborhood disadvantage on aging using newly developed epigenetic methods to assess rate of biological aging and marginal structural modeling (MSM) to account for potential confounds due to neighborhood selection. METHODS: We tested the hypothesis that neighborhood disadvantage accelerates aging using U.S. census data and five waves of interview data from a sample of 100 middle-aged African American women. Using a recently developed epigenetic index of aging, biological age was measured using weighted methylation values at 71 CpG sites. We calculated a measure of accelerated methylomic aging (in years) based upon the residual scores resulting from a regression of methylomic age on chronological age. RESULTS: Controlling for a variety of individual difference factors that could be confounded with neighborhood effects, including various health behaviors, neighborhood disadvantage was associated with accelerated biological aging. Using MSM to account for selection effects, a standard deviation increase in neighborhood disadvantage accelerated aging an average of 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings converge with prior work to provide strong evidence that neighborhood context is a significant determinant of healthy aging.
OBJECTIVES: Past research has reported an association between neighborhood disadvantage and healthy aging, but most of these studies utilize self-report measures of health or physical functioning and do not properly account for neighborhood selection effects, creating concerns regarding inflated associations. To overcome these limitations and provide a more stringent estimate of effects, the current study investigated the effect of neighborhood disadvantage on aging using newly developed epigenetic methods to assess rate of biological aging and marginal structural modeling (MSM) to account for potential confounds due to neighborhood selection. METHODS: We tested the hypothesis that neighborhood disadvantage accelerates aging using U.S. census data and five waves of interview data from a sample of 100 middle-aged African American women. Using a recently developed epigenetic index of aging, biological age was measured using weighted methylation values at 71 CpG sites. We calculated a measure of accelerated methylomic aging (in years) based upon the residual scores resulting from a regression of methylomic age on chronological age. RESULTS: Controlling for a variety of individual difference factors that could be confounded with neighborhood effects, including various health behaviors, neighborhood disadvantage was associated with accelerated biological aging. Using MSM to account for selection effects, a standard deviation increase in neighborhood disadvantage accelerated aging an average of 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings converge with prior work to provide strong evidence that neighborhood context is a significant determinant of healthy aging.
Authors: John R Beard; Shannon Blaney; Magda Cerda; Victoria Frye; Gina S Lovasi; Danielle Ompad; Andrew Rundle; David Vlahov Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Eugene Andres Houseman; William P Accomando; Devin C Koestler; Brock C Christensen; Carmen J Marsit; Heather H Nelson; John K Wiencke; Karl T Kelsey Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Xing Gao; Joseph Engeda; Latetia V Moore; Amy H Auchincloss; Kari Moore; Mahasin S Mujahid Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Brian T Joyce; Tao Gao; Kalsea Koss; Yinan Zheng; Andres Cardenas; Jonathan Heiss; Allan Just; Kai Zhang; Linda van Horn; Norrina Bai Allen; Philip Greenland; Sheldon Cohen; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Colter Mitchell; Sara McLanahan; Lisa Schneper; Daniel Notterman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Emily Oken; Marie-France Hivert; Robert Wright; Andrea Baccarelli; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Lifang Hou Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 9.685
Authors: Chantel L Martin; Lea Ghastine; Evans K Lodge; Radhika Dhingra; Cavin K Ward-Caviness Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 21.870
Authors: Steven R H Beach; Frederick X Gibbons; Sierra E Carter; Mei Ling Ong; Justin A Lavner; Man-Kit Lei; Ronald L Simons; Meg Gerrard; Robert A Philibert Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2021-12-20
Authors: E Kate Webb; Carissa N Weis; Ashley A Huggins; Elizabeth A Parisi; Kenneth P Bennett; Tara Miskovich; Jessica Krukowski; Terri A deRoon-Cassini; Christine L Larson Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 4.931
Authors: Ronald L Simons; Man-Kit Lei; Eric Klopack; Steven R H Beach; Frederick X Gibbons; Robert A Philibert Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Man-Kit Lei; Frederick X Gibbons; Ronald L Simons; Robert A Philibert; Steven R H Beach Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 4.096