Literature DB >> 22826156

Simulating from marginal structural models with time-dependent confounding.

W G Havercroft1, V Didelez.   

Abstract

We discuss why it is not always obvious how to simulate longitudinal data from a general marginal structural model (MSM) for a survival outcome while ensuring that the data exhibit complications due to time-dependent confounding. On the basis of the relation between a directed acyclic graph and an MSM, we suggest a data-generating process that satisfies both these requirements, the general validity of which we prove. Our approach is instructive regarding the interpretation of MSMs and useful in that it allows one to examine the finite sample performance of methods that claim to adjust for time-dependent confounding. We apply our methodology to design a simulation study that emulates typical longitudinal studies such as the Swiss HIV Cohort Study so that competing methods of adjusting for time-dependent covariates can be compared.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826156     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

Review 1.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  The additive hazard estimator is consistent for continuous-time marginal structural models.

Authors:  Pål C Ryalen; Mats J Stensrud; Kjetil Røysland
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Neighborhood Disadvantage and Biological Aging: Using Marginal Structural Models to Assess the Link Between Neighborhood Census Variables and Epigenetic Aging.

Authors:  Man-Kit Lei; Ronald L Simons; Steven R H Beach; Robert A Philibert
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Simulation from a known Cox MSM using standard parametric models for the g-formula.

Authors:  Jessica G Young; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Blood pressure and the risk of chronic kidney disease progression using multistate marginal structural models in the CRIC Study.

Authors:  Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Andrew J Spieker; Amanda Anderson; Paul Drawz; Michael Fischer; Stephen M Sozio; Harold Feldman; Marshall Joffe; Wei Yang; Tom Greene
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Marginal structural Cox models for estimating the association between β-interferon exposure and disease progression in a multiple sclerosis cohort.

Authors:  Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Paul Gustafson; John Petkau; Yinshan Zhao; Afsaneh Shirani; Elaine Kingwell; Charity Evans; Mia van der Kop; Joel Oger; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Bias of time-varying exposure effects due to time-varying covariate measurement strategies.

Authors:  Bas B L Penning de Vries; Rolf H H Groenwold
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.732

8.  Performance of the marginal structural cox model for estimating individual and joined effects of treatments given in combination.

Authors:  Clovis Lusivika-Nzinga; Hana Selinger-Leneman; Sophie Grabar; Dominique Costagliola; Fabrice Carrat
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Bootstrapping complex time-to-event data without individual patient data, with a view toward time-dependent exposures.

Authors:  Tobias Bluhmki; Hein Putter; Arthur Allignol; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.

Authors:  David Hajage; Florence Tubach; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Deepak L Bhatt; Yann De Rycke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.