Literature DB >> 28329223

Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kathleen A Armstrong1, Peter C Coyte2, Mitchell Brown1, Brett Beber1, John L Semple3.   

Abstract

Importance: In the age of information and patient-centered care, new methods of delivering postoperative care must be developed and evaluated. Objective: To determine whether follow-up care delivered via a mobile app can be used to avert in-person follow-up care visits compared with conventional, in-person follow-up care in the first 30 days following ambulatory surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 1 to August 31, 2015, among ambulatory patients undergoing breast reconstruction at an academic ambulatory care hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to receive follow-up care via a mobile app or at an in-person visit during the first 30 days after the operation. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the number of in-person follow-up visits during the first 30 days after the operation. Secondary end points were the number of telephone calls and emails to health care professionals, patient-reported convenience and satisfaction scores, and rates of complications.
Results: Of the 65 women in the study (mean [SD] age, 47.7 [13.4] years), 32 (49%) were in the mobile app group, and 33 (51%) were in the in-person follow-up care group. Those in the mobile app group attended a mean of 0.66 in-person visits, vs 1.64 in-person visits in the in-person follow-up care group, for a difference of 0.40 times fewer in-person visits (95% CI, 0.24-0.66; P < .001) and sent more emails to their health care professionals during the first 30 days after the operation (mean, 0.65 vs 0.15; incidence rate ratio, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.55-10.99; P = .005) than did patients in the in-person follow-up care group. This statistically significant difference was maintained at 3 months postoperatively. The mobile app group reported higher convenience scores than the in-person follow-up care group (incidence rate ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77; P = .008). There was no difference between groups in the number of telephone communications, satisfaction scores, or complication rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients undergoing ambulatory breast reconstruction can use follow-up care via a mobile app to avert in-person follow-up visits during the first 30 days after the operation. Mobile app follow-up care affects neither complication rates nor patient-reported satisfaction scores, but it improves patient-reported convenience scores. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02318953.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28329223      PMCID: PMC5547920          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  23 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Outpatient ophthalmic plastic surgery: outcomes and patient satisfaction using initial postoperative telephone call follow-up.

Authors:  H M Cooper; D R Meyer
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.746

3.  Shifting Autologous Breast Reconstruction into an Ambulatory Setting: Patient-Reported Quality of Recovery.

Authors:  Kristen Davidge; Kathleen A Armstrong; Mitchell Brown; Pamela Morgan; Mary Li; Lisa Cunningham; John L Semple
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients.

Authors:  R T Gray; M K Sut; S A Badger; C F Harvey
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2010-05

5.  Impact of telemedicine on hospital transport, length of stay, and medical outcomes in infants with suspected heart disease: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Catherine L Webb; Carol L Waugh; Jim Grigsby; David Busenbark; Kaliope Berdusis; David J Sahn; Craig A Sable
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Ovarian cancer surgery in Maryland: volume-based access to care.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Mariana L Zahurak; Marcela G del Carmen; Toby A Gordon; Harold E Fox; Edward L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia.

Authors:  M A Warner; S E Shields; C G Chute
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Potter; A Brigic; P F Whiting; S J Cawthorn; K N L Avery; J L Donovan; J M Blazeby
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The effect of mobile app home monitoring on number of in-person visits following ambulatory surgery: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathleen A Armstrong; Peter C Coyte; R Sacha Bhatia; John L Semple
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-06-03

10.  Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution.

Authors:  Patrick C Sanger; Andrea Hartzler; Sarah M Han; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Mark R Stewart; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  30 in total

1.  Post Ambulatory Discharge Follow-up Using Automated Text Messaging.

Authors:  David Leconte; Hélène Beloeil; Thierry Dreano; Claude Ecoffey
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A Mobile Health Application to Track Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery: Results from a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Matthew M Symer; Jonathan S Abelson; Jeffrey Milsom; Bridget McClure; Heather L Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Patient and Provider Preferences for Monitoring Surgical Wounds Using an mHealth App: A Formative Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Shilpa Sreedharan; Lynne S Nemeth; Jason Hirsch; Heather L Evans
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.

Authors:  Kennedy Bashan Nkhoma; Amelia Cook; Alessandra Giusti; Lindsay Farrant; Ruwayda Petrus; I Petersen; Liz Gwyther; Sridhar Venkatapuram; Richard Harding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; Sophia Y Chen; David Yu; Sandy H Fang; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Smartphone Global Positioning System (GPS) Data Enhances Recovery Assessment After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Nikhil Panda; Ian Solsky; Becky Hawrusik; Gang Liu; Harrison Reeder; Stuart Lipsitz; Eesha V Desai; Kurt W Lowery; Kate Miller; Michele A Gadd; Carrie C Lubitz; Barbara L Smith; Michelle Specht; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Alex B Haynes
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Protocol for the MobiMD trial: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a self-monitoring mobile app on hospital readmissions for complex surgical patients.

Authors:  Thomas M Diehl; James R Barrett; Daniel E Abbott; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Bret M Hanlon; Qiuyu Yang; Rachel Van Doorn; Sharon M Weber; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Two-Way Social Media Messaging in Postoperative Cataract Surgical Patients: Prospective Interventional Study.

Authors:  Thuss Sanguansak; Katharine E Morley; Michael G Morley; Kavin Thinkhamrop; Jaruwan Thuanman; Isha Agarwal
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  What Kind Of A Mobile Health App Do Patients Truly Want? A Pilot Study Among Ambulatory Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Meng-Yan Tang; Zhi-Chao Li; Yan Dai; Xiao-Ling Li
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Assessing the utility of an IoS application in the perioperative care of spine surgery patients: the NeuroPath Pilot study.

Authors:  Gregory Glauser; Zarina S Ali; Diana Gardiner; Ashwin G Ramayya; Rachel Pessoa; M Sean Grady; William C Welch; Eric L Zager; Esther Sim; Virginia Haughey; Brian Wells; Michael Restuccia; Gordon Tait; Glenn Fala; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2019-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.