Literature DB >> 15099945

Ovarian cancer surgery in Maryland: volume-based access to care.

Robert E Bristow1, Mariana L Zahurak, Marcela G del Carmen, Toby A Gordon, Harold E Fox, Edward L Trimble, F J Montz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the patterns of primary surgical care for ovarian cancer in a statewide population according to annual surgeon and hospital case volume.
METHODS: The Maryland hospital discharge database was accessed for annual surgeon and hospital ovarian cancer case volume for the time intervals: 1990-1992, 1993-1995, 1996-98, and 1999-2000. Annual surgeon case volume was categorized as low (</=4), intermediate (5-9), or high (>/=10). Annual hospital case volume was categorized as low (</=9), intermediate (10-19), or high (>/=20). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate for significant trends in case volume distribution over time and factors associated with access to high-volume care.
RESULTS: Overall, 2417 cases were performed by 531 surgeons at 49 hospitals. The distribution according to annual surgeon case volume was low (56.3%), intermediate (9.2%), and high (34.5%). Between 1993 and 2000, there was no significant increase in the proportion of cases performed by high-volume surgeons (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.81-1.33, P = 0.79). Access to high-volume surgeons was positively associated with care at high-volume hospitals and negatively associated with residence >/=50 miles from a high-volume hospital. The overall hospital volume case distribution was low (49.6%), intermediate (27.6%), and high (22.8%). There was a statistically significant decrease in access to high-volume hospitals between 1990 and 1998 (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.30-0.50, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: A large proportion of primary ovarian cancer surgeries are performed by low-volume surgeons at low-volume hospitals. In light of positive volume-outcomes data for malignancies treated with technically complex operative procedures, increased efforts to concentrate the surgical care of women with ovarian cancer are warranted. Condensed abstract. A large proportion of primary ovarian cancer surgeries are performed by low-volume surgeons at low-volume hospitals. In light of positive volume-outcomes data for malignancies treated with technically complex operative procedures, increased efforts to concentrate the surgical care of women with ovarian cancer are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15099945     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

1.  Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kathleen A Armstrong; Peter C Coyte; Mitchell Brown; Brett Beber; John L Semple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Will patients benefit from regionalization of gynecologic cancer care?

Authors:  Kathleen F Brookfield; Michael C Cheung; Relin Yang; Margaret M Byrne; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Variability in chemotherapy delivery for elderly women with advanced stage ovarian cancer and its impact on survival.

Authors:  Jd Wright; T Doan; R McBride; Js Jacobson; Dl Hershman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Survival and recurrence after intraperitoneal chemotherapy use: Retrospective review of ovarian cancer hospital registry data.

Authors:  Shalkar Adambekov; Samia Lopa; Robert P Edwards; Lara Lemon; Shu Wang; Sarah E Taylor; Brian Orr; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.