Samuel T Edwards1,2,3, Somnath Saha1,2,3, Julia C Prentice4,5,6, Steven D Pizer4,7. 1. Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon. 2. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 4. Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine how medical complexity modifies the relationship between enrollment in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home-based primary care (HBPC) and hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) for veterans with diabetes mellitus and whether the effect of HBPC on hospitalizations varies according to clinical condition. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: VA and non-VA hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: VA beneficiaries aged 67 and older with diabetes mellitus and enrolled in Medicare (N = 364,972). MEASUREMENTS: Instrumental variables regression models were used to estimate the effect of HBPC enrollment on hospitalization for ACSCs (defined according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Prevention Quality Indicators) overall and in subgroups stratified according to medical complexity. Models were also estimated for each ACSC to determine which conditions were most sensitive to HBPC. Distance from the veteran's residence to the nearest HBPC site was used as the instrumental variable. RESULTS: HBPC was associated with fewer ACSC hospitalizations (odds ratio (OR) = 0.35 per person-month, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30-0.42). For veterans in the highest quartile of medical complexity, HBPC enrollment was associated with fewer ACSC hospitalizations (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19-0.93), whereas for those in the lowest quartile, HBPC was associated with more ACSC hospitalizations (OR = 33.2, 95% CI = 4.6-240.1). HBPC enrollment was associated with fewer hospitalizations for a range of ACSCs. CONCLUSION: HBPC enrollment was associated with fewer hospitalizations for a range of ACSCs in veterans with diabetes mellitus but only in the most medically complex individuals. This demonstrates the importance of appropriate targeting and suggests that the effect of HBPC is attributable to its comprehensive approach rather than condition-specific interventions. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVES: To examine how medical complexity modifies the relationship between enrollment in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home-based primary care (HBPC) and hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) for veterans with diabetes mellitus and whether the effect of HBPC on hospitalizations varies according to clinical condition. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: VA and non-VA hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: VA beneficiaries aged 67 and older with diabetes mellitus and enrolled in Medicare (N = 364,972). MEASUREMENTS: Instrumental variables regression models were used to estimate the effect of HBPC enrollment on hospitalization for ACSCs (defined according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Prevention Quality Indicators) overall and in subgroups stratified according to medical complexity. Models were also estimated for each ACSC to determine which conditions were most sensitive to HBPC. Distance from the veteran's residence to the nearest HBPC site was used as the instrumental variable. RESULTS: HBPC was associated with fewer ACSC hospitalizations (odds ratio (OR) = 0.35 per person-month, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30-0.42). For veterans in the highest quartile of medical complexity, HBPC enrollment was associated with fewer ACSC hospitalizations (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19-0.93), whereas for those in the lowest quartile, HBPC was associated with more ACSC hospitalizations (OR = 33.2, 95% CI = 4.6-240.1). HBPC enrollment was associated with fewer hospitalizations for a range of ACSCs. CONCLUSION: HBPC enrollment was associated with fewer hospitalizations for a range of ACSCs in veterans with diabetes mellitus but only in the most medically complex individuals. This demonstrates the importance of appropriate targeting and suggests that the effect of HBPC is attributable to its comprehensive approach rather than condition-specific interventions. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
chronic disease; frail elderly adults; home care services; person-centered care; policy
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Kristin Koelling; Kevin Stroupe; Noreen Arnold; Katherine Mallin; Min-Woong Sohn; Frances M Weaver; Larry Manheim; Linda Kok Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: David J Nyweide; Denise L Anthony; Julie P W Bynum; Robert L Strawderman; William B Weeks; Lawrence P Casalino; Elliott S Fisher Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Bessie Ann Young; Elizabeth Lin; Michael Von Korff; Greg Simon; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Siobhan Everson-Stewart; Leslie Kinder; Malia Oliver; Edward J Boyko; Wayne J Katon Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Barbara Starfield; Klaus W Lemke; Terence Bernhardt; Steven S Foldes; Christopher B Forrest; Jonathan P Weiner Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Stephanie M Peterson; James M Naessens; Rozalina G Mccoy; Gregory J Hanson; Latonya J Hickson; Christina Yy Chen; Parvez A Rahman; Nilay D Shah; Lynn Borkenhagen; Anupam Chandra; Rachel Havyer; Aaron Leppin; Paul Y Takahashi Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Jian Gao; Eileen Moran; Steffie Woolhandler; Andrew Toporek; Andrew P Wilper; David U Himmelstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Cherinne Arundel; Helen Sheriff; Donna M Bearden; Charity J Morgan; Paul A Heidenreich; Gregg C Fonarow; Javed Butler; Richard M Allman; Ali Ahmed Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Rupak Datta; Terri Fried; John R O'Leary; Andrew R Zullo; Heather Allore; Ling Han; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Andrew Cohen Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 4.423
Authors: Evelyn T Chang; Jean Yoon; Aryan Esmaeili; Donna M Zulman; Michael K Ong; Susan E Stockdale; Elvira E Jimenez; Karen Chu; David Atkins; Angela Denietolis; Steven M Asch Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 3.734