OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of access to care characteristics on health care use patterns among those veterans dually eligible for Medicare and Veterans Affairs (VA) services. METHODS: We used a retrospective, cross-sectional design to identify veterans who were eligible to use VA and Medicare health care in calendar year 1999. We analyzed national VA utilization and Medicare claims data. We used descriptive and multivariable generalized ordered logit analyses to examine how patient, geographic, and environmental factors affect the percent reliance on VA and Medicare inpatient and outpatient services. RESULTS: Of the 1.47 million veterans in our study population with outpatient use, 18% were VA-only users, 36% were Medicare-only users, and 46% were both VA and Medicare users. Among veterans with inpatient use, 24% were VA only, 69% were Medicare only, and 6% were both VA and Medicare users. Multivariable analysis revealed that veterans who were black or had a higher VA priority were most likely to rely on the VA. Patient with higher risk scores were most likely to rely on a combination of VA and Medicare health care. Patients who lived farther from VA hospitals were less likely to rely on VA health care, particularly for inpatient care. Patients living in urban areas with more health care resources were less likely to rely on VA health care. CONCLUSIONS: VA health care provides an important safety net for vulnerable populations. Targeted approaches that carefully consider the simultaneous impacts of VA and Medicare policy changes on minority and high-risk populations are essential to ensure veterans have access to needed health care.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of access to care characteristics on health care use patterns among those veterans dually eligible for Medicare and Veterans Affairs (VA) services. METHODS: We used a retrospective, cross-sectional design to identify veterans who were eligible to use VA and Medicare health care in calendar year 1999. We analyzed national VA utilization and Medicare claims data. We used descriptive and multivariable generalized ordered logit analyses to examine how patient, geographic, and environmental factors affect the percent reliance on VA and Medicare inpatient and outpatient services. RESULTS: Of the 1.47 million veterans in our study population with outpatient use, 18% were VA-only users, 36% were Medicare-only users, and 46% were both VA and Medicare users. Among veterans with inpatient use, 24% were VA only, 69% were Medicare only, and 6% were both VA and Medicare users. Multivariable analysis revealed that veterans who were black or had a higher VA priority were most likely to rely on the VA. Patient with higher risk scores were most likely to rely on a combination of VA and Medicare health care. Patients who lived farther from VA hospitals were less likely to rely on VA health care, particularly for inpatient care. Patients living in urban areas with more health care resources were less likely to rely on VA health care. CONCLUSIONS: VA health care provides an important safety net for vulnerable populations. Targeted approaches that carefully consider the simultaneous impacts of VA and Medicare policy changes on minority and high-risk populations are essential to ensure veterans have access to needed health care.
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Elizabeth Tarlov; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Ruth Perrin; Qiuying Zhang; Thomas Weichle; M Rosario Ferreira; Todd Lee; Al B Benson; Nirmala Bhoopalam; Charles L Bennett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard E Nelson; Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Junji Lin; Scott L DuVall; Olga Patterson; James Tsai; Nimia Reyes Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Wei Duan-Porter; Brian C Martinson; Nancy Greer; Brent C Taylor; Kristen Ullman; Lauren McKenzie; Christina Rosebush; Roderick MacDonald; Samuel Falde; Timothy J Wilt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joshua D Niznik; Jacob N Hunnicutt; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Florentina Sileanu; Sherrie L Aspinall; Sydney P Springer; Mary J Ersek; Walid F Gellad; Loren J Schleiden; Joseph T Hanlon; Joshua M Thorpe; Carolyn T Thorpe Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer Humensky; Henry Carretta; Kristin de Groot; Melissa M Brown; Elizabeth Tarlov; Denise M Hynes Journal: Medicare Medicaid Res Rev Date: 2012-10-19
Authors: Pascale Schwab; Harlan Sayles; Debra Bergman; Grant W Cannon; Kaleb Michaud; Ted R Mikuls; Jennifer Barton Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Sarah M Wilson; Lauren P Hair; Jeffrey S Hertzberg; Angela C Kirby; Maren K Olsen; Jennifer H Lindquist; Matthew L Maciejewski; Jean C Beckham; Patrick S Calhoun Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Louise C Walter; Kathy Z Fung; Katharine A Kirby; Ying Shi; Roxanne Espaldon; Sarah O'Brien; Stephen J Freedland; Adam A Powell; Richard M Hoffman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 21.873