Michael L Barnett1, John Hsu2, J Michael McWilliams1. 1. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Mongan Institute for Health Care Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Medicare penalizes hospitals with higher than expected readmission rates by up to 3% of annual inpatient payments. Expected rates are adjusted only for patients' age, sex, discharge diagnosis, and recent diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which a comprehensive set of patient characteristics accounts for differences in hospital readmission rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using survey data from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and linked Medicare claims for HRS participants enrolled in Medicare who were hospitalized from 2009 to 2012 (n = 8067 admissions), we assessed 29 patient characteristics from survey data and claims as potential predictors of 30-day readmission when added to standard Medicare adjustments of hospital readmission rates. We then compared the distribution of these characteristics between participants admitted to hospitals with higher vs lower hospital-wide readmission rates reported by Medicare. Finally, we estimated differences in the probability of readmission between these groups of participants before vs after adjusting for the additional patient characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Of the additional 29 patient characteristics assessed, 22 significantly predicted readmission beyond standard adjustments, and 17 of these were distributed differently between hospitals in the highest vs lowest quintiles of publicly reported hospital-wide readmission rates (P ≤ .04 for all comparisons). Almost all of these differences (16 of 17) indicated that participants admitted to hospitals in the highest quintile of readmission rates were more likely to have characteristics that were associated with a higher probability of readmission. The difference in the probability of readmission between participants admitted to hospitals in the highest vs lowest quintile of hospital-wide readmission rates was reduced by 48% from 4.41 percentage points with standard adjustments used by Medicare to 2.29 percentage points after adjustment for all patient characteristics assessed (reduction in difference: -2.12; 95% CI, -3.33 to -0.67; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient characteristics not included in Medicare's current risk-adjustment methods explained much of the difference in readmission risk between patients admitted to hospitals with higher vs lower readmission rates. Hospitals with high readmission rates may be penalized to a large extent based on the patients they serve.
IMPORTANCE: Medicare penalizes hospitals with higher than expected readmission rates by up to 3% of annual inpatient payments. Expected rates are adjusted only for patients' age, sex, discharge diagnosis, and recent diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which a comprehensive set of patient characteristics accounts for differences in hospital readmission rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using survey data from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and linked Medicare claims for HRSparticipants enrolled in Medicare who were hospitalized from 2009 to 2012 (n = 8067 admissions), we assessed 29 patient characteristics from survey data and claims as potential predictors of 30-day readmission when added to standard Medicare adjustments of hospital readmission rates. We then compared the distribution of these characteristics between participants admitted to hospitals with higher vs lower hospital-wide readmission rates reported by Medicare. Finally, we estimated differences in the probability of readmission between these groups of participants before vs after adjusting for the additional patient characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Of the additional 29 patient characteristics assessed, 22 significantly predicted readmission beyond standard adjustments, and 17 of these were distributed differently between hospitals in the highest vs lowest quintiles of publicly reported hospital-wide readmission rates (P ≤ .04 for all comparisons). Almost all of these differences (16 of 17) indicated that participants admitted to hospitals in the highest quintile of readmission rates were more likely to have characteristics that were associated with a higher probability of readmission. The difference in the probability of readmission between participants admitted to hospitals in the highest vs lowest quintile of hospital-wide readmission rates was reduced by 48% from 4.41 percentage points with standard adjustments used by Medicare to 2.29 percentage points after adjustment for all patient characteristics assessed (reduction in difference: -2.12; 95% CI, -3.33 to -0.67; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient characteristics not included in Medicare's current risk-adjustment methods explained much of the difference in readmission risk between patients admitted to hospitals with higher vs lower readmission rates. Hospitals with high readmission rates may be penalized to a large extent based on the patients they serve.
Authors: Qian Gu; Lane Koenig; Jennifer Faerberg; Caroline Rossi Steinberg; Christopher Vaz; Mary P Wheatley Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; Chohreh Partovian; Zhenqiu Lin; Jacqueline N Grady; Jeph Herrin; Mitchell Conover; Julia Montague; Chloe Dillaway; Kathleen Bartczak; Lisa G Suter; Joseph S Ross; Susannah M Bernheim; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth E Drye Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Harlan M Krumholz; Zhenqiu Lin; Elizabeth E Drye; Mayur M Desai; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Jennifer A Mattera; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-03
Authors: Jamie Jurkiewicz Cavanaugh; Christine D Jones; Genevieve Embree; Katy Tsai; Thomas Miller; Betsy Bryant Shilliday; Brooke McGuirt; Robin Roche; Michael Pignone; Darren A DeWalt; Shana Ratner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Addie Middleton; James E Graham; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin; Janet Prvu Bettger; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Orestis A Panagiotou; Amit Kumar; Roee Gutman; Laura M Keohane; Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez; Momotazur Rahman; Pedro L Gozalo; Vincent Mor; Amal N Trivedi Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael P Cary; Victoria Goode; Nancy Crego; Deirdre Thornlow; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Helen M Hoenig; Kayla Baba; Scarlet Fellingham; Elizabeth I Merwin Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: LaTonya J Hickson; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Priya Ramar; Megan S Reinalda; Cynthia S Crowson; Amy W Williams; Robert C Albright; Macaulay A Onuigbo; Andrew D Rule; Nilay D Shah Journal: Nephron Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 2.847
Authors: Muthiah Vaduganathan; Cian P McCarthy; Colby Ayers; Deepak L Bhatt; Dharam J Kumbhani; James A de Lemos; Gregg C Fonarow; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2020-01-01
Authors: Karin Nelson; Greg Schwartz; Susan Hernandez; Joseph Simonetti; Idamay Curtis; Stephan D Fihn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 5.128