BACKGROUND: Although posthospitalization care transitions programs (CTP) are highly diverse, their overall program thoroughness is most predictive of their success. OBJECTIVE: To identify components of a successful homebased CTP and patient characteristics that are most predictive of reduced 30-day readmissions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PATIENTS: A total of 315 community-dwelling, hospitalized, older adults (≥60 years) at high risk for readmission (Elder Risk Assessment score ≥16), discharged home over the period of January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2013. SETTING: Midwest primary care practice in an integrated health system. INTERVENTION: Enrollment in a CTP during acute hospitalization. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was all-cause readmission within 30 days of the first CTP evaluation. Logistic regression was used to examine independent variables, including patient demographics, comorbidities, number of medications, completion, and timing of program fidelity measures, and prior utilization of healthcare. RESULTS: The overall 30-day readmission rate was 17.1%. The intensity of follow-up varied among patients, with 17.1% and 50.8% of the patients requiring one and ≥3 home visits, respectively, within 30 days. More than half (54.6%) required visits beyond 30 days. Compared with patients who were not readmitted, readmitted patients were less likely to exhibit cognitive impairment (29.6% vs 46.0%; P = .03) and were more likely to have high medication use (59.3% vs 44.4%; P = .047), more emergency department (ED; 0.8 vs 0.4; P = .03) and primary care visits (4.0 vs 3.0; P = .018), and longer cumulative time in the hospital (4.6 vs 2.5 days; P = .03) within 180 days of the index hospitalization. Multivariable analysis indicated that only cognitive impairment and previous ED visits were important predictors of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: No single CTP component reliably predicted reduced readmission risk. Patients with cognitive impairment and polypharmacy derived the most benefit from the program.
BACKGROUND: Although posthospitalization care transitions programs (CTP) are highly diverse, their overall program thoroughness is most predictive of their success. OBJECTIVE: To identify components of a successful homebased CTP and patient characteristics that are most predictive of reduced 30-day readmissions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PATIENTS: A total of 315 community-dwelling, hospitalized, older adults (≥60 years) at high risk for readmission (Elder Risk Assessment score ≥16), discharged home over the period of January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2013. SETTING: Midwest primary care practice in an integrated health system. INTERVENTION: Enrollment in a CTP during acute hospitalization. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was all-cause readmission within 30 days of the first CTP evaluation. Logistic regression was used to examine independent variables, including patient demographics, comorbidities, number of medications, completion, and timing of program fidelity measures, and prior utilization of healthcare. RESULTS: The overall 30-day readmission rate was 17.1%. The intensity of follow-up varied among patients, with 17.1% and 50.8% of the patients requiring one and ≥3 home visits, respectively, within 30 days. More than half (54.6%) required visits beyond 30 days. Compared with patients who were not readmitted, readmitted patients were less likely to exhibit cognitive impairment (29.6% vs 46.0%; P = .03) and were more likely to have high medication use (59.3% vs 44.4%; P = .047), more emergency department (ED; 0.8 vs 0.4; P = .03) and primary care visits (4.0 vs 3.0; P = .018), and longer cumulative time in the hospital (4.6 vs 2.5 days; P = .03) within 180 days of the index hospitalization. Multivariable analysis indicated that only cognitive impairment and previous ED visits were important predictors of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: No single CTP component reliably predicted reduced readmission risk. Patients with cognitive impairment and polypharmacy derived the most benefit from the program.
Authors: Jukka K Rönneikkö; Matti Mäkelä; Esa R Jämsen; Heini Huhtala; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Anja Noro; Jaakko N Valvanne Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Jennifer A Palmer; Angelo E Volandes; Laura C Hanson; Daniel Habtemariam; Michele L Shaffer Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Pedro Gozalo; Joan M Teno; Susan L Mitchell; Jon Skinner; Julie Bynum; Denise Tyler; Vincent Mor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Karen B Hirschman; Alexandra L Hanlon; Kathryn H Bowles; Christine Bradway; Kathleen M McCauley; Mark V Pauly Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Sarah J Crane; Ericka E Tung; Gregory J Hanson; Stephen Cha; Rajeev Chaudhry; Paul Y Takahashi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Paul Y Takahashi; Anupam Chandra; Rozalina G McCoy; Lynn S Borkenhagen; Mary E Larson; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Joel A Hickman; Kristi M Swanson; Gregory J Hanson; James M Naessens Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Paul Y Takahashi; Euijung Ryu; Suzette J Bielinski; Matthew Hathcock; Gregory D Jenkins; James R Cerhan; Janet E Olson Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med Date: 2021-02-11