| Literature DB >> 28315450 |
O S Ademowo1, H K I Dias1, I Milic1, A Devitt1, R Moran2, R Mulcahy3, A N Howard4, J M Nolan2, H R Griffiths5.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative disease, characterised by decline of memory, cognitive function and changes in behaviour. Generic markers of lipid peroxidation are increased in AD and reactive oxygen species have been suggested to be involved in the aetiology of cognitive decline. Carotenoids are depleted in AD serum, therefore we have compared serum lipid oxidation between AD and age-matched control subjects before and after carotenoid supplementation. The novel oxidised phospholipid biomarker 1-palmitoyl-2-(5'-oxo-valeroyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POVPC) was analysed using electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (MS) with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), 8-isoprostane (IsoP) was measured by ELISA and ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) was measured by a colorimetric assay. AD patients (n=21) and healthy age-matched control subjects (n=16) were supplemented with either Macushield™ (10mg meso-zeaxanthin, 10mg lutein, 2mg zeaxanthin) or placebo (sunflower oil) for six months. The MRM-MS method determined serum POVPC sensitively (from 10µl serum) and reproducibly (CV=7.9%). At baseline, AD subjects had higher serum POVPC compared to age-matched controls, (p=0.017) and cognitive function was correlated inversely with POVPC (r=-0.37; p=0.04). After six months of carotenoid intervention, serum POVPC was not different in AD patients compared to healthy controls. However, POVPC was significantly higher in control subjects after six months of carotenoid intervention compared to their baseline (p=0.03). Serum IsoP concentration was unrelated to disease or supplementation. Serum FRAP was significantly lower in AD than healthy controls but was unchanged by carotenoid intervention (p=0.003). In conclusion, serum POVPC is higher in AD patients compared to control subjects, is not reduced by carotenoid supplementation and correlates with cognitive function.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive function; Lipid peroxidation; Lutein; Mass spectrometry; Meso-zeaxanthin; Oxidative stress; POVPC; Supplementation; Zeaxanthin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28315450 PMCID: PMC5488966 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.03.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Free Radic Biol Med ISSN: 0891-5849 Impact factor: 7.376
POVPC analysis in quality control samples.
| 6.26E+05 | 3.32E+06 | 6.26E+05 | |||||
| 6.36E+05 | 3.02E+06 | 6.99E+05 | |||||
| 5.80E+05 | 3.23E+06 | 5.96E+05 | |||||
| 5.90E+05 | 2.96E+06 | 6.62E+05 | |||||
| 5.84E+05 | 3.11E+06 | 6.23E+05 | |||||
| 6.57E+05 | 2.86E+06 | 7.63E+05 | |||||
| 6.48E+05 | 3.07E+06 | 7.01E+05 | |||||
| 6.05E+05 | 3.04E+06 | 6.61E+05 | |||||
| 5.83E+05 | 3.29E+06 | 5.88E+05 | |||||
| 6.22E+05 | 3.53E+06 | 5.85E+05 | |||||
| 6.69E+05 | 3.64E+06 | 6.10E+05 | |||||
| 7.86E+05 | 3.97E+06 | 6.57E+05 | |||||
| 7.75E+05 | 4.09E+06 | 6.29E+05 | |||||
| 7.27E+05 | 4.01E+06 | 6.02E+05 | |||||
| QC sample number (n) | Mean | SE | CV | ||||
| Intra-day assay (6) | 6.62E+05 | 2.54E+04 | 6.10E+04 | 9.23% | |||
| Interday assay (14) | 6.43E+05 | 1.36E+04 | 5.10E+04 | 7.94% | |||
QC samples were analysed on fourteen occasions; 3 at the start and the end of the analysis, and one after every 9 samples; a blank was also analysed after every 3 samples. The QC results show that the LC method is accurate with an intra-day assay %CV of 9.23 and inter-day assay %CV of 7.94. The QC sample is a pooled extract of all the samples from the study.
Demographic, lifestyle and cognition data of the AD and control subjects.
| Age (years) | 79±8.8 | 75±6.6 | 0.24 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.02±3.6 | 25.96±2.3 | 0.96 |
| Exercise (total exercise, minutes per week) | 225.3±253.7 | 220.9±172 | 0.95 |
| Diet (estimated lutein and zeaxanthin intake) | 17.2±7.7 | 23.5±13.1 | 0.07 |
| Education (total years in education) | 11.45±4.3 | 14.4±4.0 | 0.04 |
| Smoking (% current) | 14% | 19% | 0.99 |
| Gender (% female) | 43% | 50% | 0.99 |
| Diabetes (% with diabetes) | 14% | 19% | 0.99 |
| MMSE | 19±3.8 | 29±1.3 | <0.0001 |
| Semantic fluency score | 5.55±2.65 | 15.6±6.24 | <0.0001 |
| Phonemic fluency score | 16.9±11.5 | 33.4±13.3 | 0.0005 |
Data are reported as mean±standard deviation for interval data and percentages for categorical data. AD subjects recruited into the study were confirmed to have mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease; age-matched control subjects were free of mild to moderate AD. Significant statistical difference (p value) between AD and control subjects was assessed using independent samples t-tests; Exercise was measured as any sporting activity per week; Diet was estimated as dietary intake of L and Z; Smoking was categorized as current (smoked ≥100 cigarettes in lifetime and at least one cigarette within the last 12 months) or non-smoking (smoked ≤100 cigarettes in lifetime and none within the last 12 months); Diabetes was confirmed by self-report and by HbA1c analysis; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; Semantic fluency score, (categorical verbal fluency) score was obtained from the number of animals named by the subject in 1 min; Phonemic fluency score, (word fluency) score was generated by the total number of words produced for each of the letters F, A, and S, in 1 min.
Fig. 1POVPC analysis by LC MS/MS using MRM. (a). Extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) of PC head-group fragment m/z 184 for POVPC and dPOPC. The oxidised phospholipid, POVPC, eluted at 20.8 min and the internal standard (deuterated POPC) eluted at 30.8 min. (b). Linear dynamic range of oxPLs in serum volumes. Lipids were extracted from 3 to 20 µl serum and analysed in triplicates. 10 µl of serum sample was the ideal volume selected for this study.
Fig. 2(a) Box plot (inter-quartile range, with whiskers showing the minimum to maximum range) of ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) in control and AD groups at baseline (p=0.003) (b) Box plot showing the serum 8-isoprostane (IsoP) concentration in control and AD groups at baseline (p=0.717). (c) Box plot showing the serum POVPC levels in control and AD groups at baseline (##, p=0.017). (d) Box plot showing the serum POVPC levels in AD patients being treated with cholinesterase inhibitor (+CI) and AD patients without cholinesterase inhibitor (-CI) treatment (p=0.26). (e) Scatter plot showing the relationship between cognitive function and lipid oxidation with no correlation existing between MMSE score and serum FRAP r=−0.19. (f) Scatter plot showing the relationship between cognitive function and lipid oxidation with no correlation existing between MMSE score and serum IsoP concentration, r=−0.08. (g) Scatter plot showing the relationship between cognitive function and lipid oxidation as MMSE score and POVPC intensity, r=−0.37, p=0.04 and with MMSE score explaining 13.7% of the variation in POVPC levels. (h) Scatter plot showing the relationship between cognitive function and lipid oxidation with no correlation existing between SVF score and POVPC, r=−0.05. (i) Scatter plot showing the relationship between cognitive function and lipid oxidation with no significant correlation existing between FAS score and POVPC, r=−0.27.
Fig. 3Box plots (inter-quartile range, with whiskers showing the minimum to maximum range) where 0, baseline; 6, six months, C, control group; A, AD group; P, placebo intervention; C, carotenoid intervention; (a) Animal semantic fluency (SVF) score in control subjects and AD patients at baseline and at 6 months of placebo/carotenoid intervention; (b) Phonemic fluency score (FAS) in control subjects and AD patients at baseline and at 6 months of placebo/carotenoid intervention; (c) Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) in control and AD groups at baseline and at 6 months of placebo/carotenoid intervention. (d) Serum concentrations of 8-isoprostane (IsoP) in control and AD groups at baseline and after 6 months of placebo/carotenoid intervention; (e) Serum POVPC in control and AD groups at baseline and after 6 months of placebo/carotenoid intervention. POVPC levels between control subjects at baseline and after 6 months carotenoid supplementation (#, p=0.03 compared to baseline).