Literature DB >> 28313619

Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics.

Hilary A Neckles1, Richard L Wetzel1, Robert J Orth1.   

Abstract

The independent and interactive effects of nutrient concentration and epiphyte grazers on epiphyte biomass and macrophyte growth and production were examined in Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) microcosms. Experiments were conducted during early summer, late summer, fall, and spring in a greenhouse on the York River estuary of Chesapeake Bay. Nutrient treatments consisted of ambient or enriched (3× ambient) concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (ammonium nitrate) and phosphate. Grazer treatments consisted of the presence or absence of field densities of isopods, amphipods, and gastropods. epiphyte biomass increased with both grazer removal and nutrient enrichment during summer and spring experiments. The effect of grazers was stronger than that of nutrients. There was little epiphyte response to treatment during the fall, a result possibly of high ambient nutrient concentrations and low grazing pressure. Under low grazer densities of early summer, macrophyte production (g m-2 d-1) was reduced by grazer removal and nutrient enrichment independently. Under high grazer densities of late summer, macrophyte production was reduced by enrichment only with grazers absent. During spring and fall there were no macrophyte responses to treatment. The relative influence of epiphytes on macrophyte production may have been related to seasonally changing water temperature and macrophyte requirements for light and inorganic carbon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epiphytes; Grazing; Nutrient enrichment; Submersed macrophytes; Zostera marina

Year:  1993        PMID: 28313619     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Amphipods on seaweeds: partners or pests?

Authors:  J E Duffy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Chesapeake bay: an unprecedented decline in submerged aquatic vegetation.

Authors:  R J Orth; K A Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The effect of grazer size manipulation on periphyton communities.

Authors:  Antonella Cattaneo; Jacob Kalff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics.

Authors:  Hilary A Neckles; Richard L Wetzel; Robert J Orth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Photosynthetic responses of Zostera marina L. (Eelgrass) to in situ manipulations of light intensity.

Authors:  William C Dennison; Randall S Alberte
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Responses of stream algae to grazing minnows and nutrients: a field test for interactions.

Authors:  A J Stewart
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Genotypic variation in tolerance and resistance to fouling in the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus.

Authors:  Tuija Honkanen; Veijo Jormalainen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics.

Authors:  Hilary A Neckles; Richard L Wetzel; Robert J Orth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Top-down impact through a bottom-up mechanism: the effect of limpet grazing on growth, productivity and carbon allocation of Zostera marina L. (eelgrass).

Authors:  Richard C Zimmerman; Donald G Kohrs; Randall S Alberte
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Development of an epiphyte indicator of nutrient enrichment: threshold values for seagrass epiphyte load.

Authors:  Walter G Nelson
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.958

5.  Development of an epiphyte indicator of nutrient enrichment: a critical evaluation of observational and experimental studies.

Authors:  Walter G Nelson
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.958

6.  The physiological responses of Vallisneria natans to epiphytic algae with the increase of N and P concentrations in water bodies.

Authors:  Yu-Zhi Song; Jin-Qi Wang; Yong-Xia Gao; Xue-Jian Xie
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Evaluation of a combined macrophyte-epiphyte bioassay for assessing nutrient enrichment in the Portneuf River, Idaho, USA.

Authors:  Andrew M Ray; Christopher A Mebane; Flint Raben; Kathryn M Irvine; Amy M Marcarelli
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Faunal Communities Are Invariant to Fragmentation in Experimental Seagrass Landscapes.

Authors:  Jonathan S Lefcheck; Scott R Marion; Alfonso V Lombana; Robert J Orth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The perilous state of seagrass in the British Isles.

Authors:  Benjamin L Jones; Richard K F Unsworth
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.