Literature DB >> 24549944

Evaluation of a combined macrophyte-epiphyte bioassay for assessing nutrient enrichment in the Portneuf River, Idaho, USA.

Andrew M Ray1, Christopher A Mebane, Flint Raben, Kathryn M Irvine, Amy M Marcarelli.   

Abstract

We describe and evaluate a laboratory bioassay that uses Lemna minor L. and attached epiphytes to characterize the status of ambient and nutrient-enriched water from the Portneuf River, Idaho. Specifically, we measured morphological (number of fronds, longest surface axis, and root length) and population-level (number of plants and dry mass) responses of L. minor and community-level (ash-free dry mass [AFDM] and chlorophyll a [Chl a]) responses of epiphytes to nutrient enrichment. Overall, measures of macrophyte biomass and abundance increased with increasing concentrations of dissolved phosphorus (P) and responded more predictably to nutrient enrichment than morphological measures. Epiphyte AFDM and Chl a were also greatest in P-enriched water; enrichments of N alone produced no measurable epiphytic response. The epiphyte biomass response did not directly mirror macrophyte biomass responses, illustrating the value of a combined macrophyte-epiphyte assay to more fully evaluate nutrient management strategies. Finally, the most P-enriched waters not only supported greater standing stocks of macrophyte and epiphytes but also had significantly higher water column dissolved oxygen and dissolved organic carbon concentrations and a lower pH. Advantages of this macrophyte-epiphyte bioassay over more traditional single-species assays include the use of a more realistic level of biological organization, a relatively short assay schedule (~10 days), and the inclusion of multiple biological response and water-quality measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24549944     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3682-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  V H Smith; G D Tilman; J C Nekola
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 2.  How green is my river? A new paradigm of eutrophication in rivers.

Authors:  John Hilton; Matthew O'Hare; Michael J Bowes; J Iwan Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  The use of plants for environmental monitoring and assessment.

Authors:  W Wang; K Freemark
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 4.  Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing.

Authors:  W Wang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics.

Authors:  Hilary A Neckles; Richard L Wetzel; Robert J Orth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Limitations of growth-parameters in Lemna gibba bioassays for arsenic and uranium under variable phosphate availability.

Authors:  Martin Mkandawire; Barbara Taubert; E Gert Dudel
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Duckweed Lemna minor as a tool for testing toxicity and genotoxicity of surface waters.

Authors:  S Radić; D Stipaničev; P Cvjetko; M Marijanović Rajčić; S Sirac; B Pevalek-Kozlina; M Pavlica
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  SOME FACTORS IN THE COMPETITION OR ANTAGONISM AMONG BACTERIA, ALGAE, AND AQUATIC WEEDS.

Authors:  G P Filzgerald
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 2.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.