Literature DB >> 30294244

Development of an epiphyte indicator of nutrient enrichment: threshold values for seagrass epiphyte load.

Walter G Nelson1.   

Abstract

Metrics of epiphyte load on macrophytes were evaluated for use as quantitative biological indicators for nutrient impacts in estuarine waters, based on review and analysis of the literature on epiphytes and macrophytes, primarily seagrasses, but including some brackish and freshwater rooted macrophyte species. An approach is presented that empirically derives threshold epiphyte loads which are likely to cause specified levels of decrease in macrophyte response metrics such as biomass, shoot density, percent cover, production and growth. Data from 36 studies of 10 macrophyte species were pooled to derive relationships between epiphyte load and -25 and -50% seagrass response levels, which are proposed as the primary basis for establishment of critical threshold values. Given multiple sources of variability in the response data, threshold ranges based on the range of values falling between the median and the 75th quantiles of observations at a given seagrass response level are proposed rather than single, critical point values. Four epiphyte load threshold categories - low, moderate, high, very high, are proposed. Comparison of values of epiphyte loads associated with 25 and 50% reductions in light to macrophytes suggest that the threshold ranges are realistic both in terms of the principle mechanism of impact to macrophytes and in terms of the magnitude of resultant impacts expressed by the macrophytes. Some variability in response levels was observed among climate regions, and additional data collected with a standardized approach could help in the development of regionalized threshold ranges for the epiphyte load indicator.

Keywords:  Epiphyte; indicator development; nutrient indicator; seagrass; water quality indicator

Year:  2017        PMID: 30294244      PMCID: PMC6171120          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Indic        ISSN: 1470-160X            Impact factor:   4.958


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of eutrophication in estuaries: pressure-state-response and nitrogen source apportionment.

Authors:  David Whitall; Suzanne Bricker; Joao Ferreira; Ana M Nobre; Teresa Simas; Margarida Silva
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  A review of epiphyte community development: surface interactions and settlement on seagrass.

Authors:  Teena S Michael; Hyun Woung Shin; Richard Hanna; David C Spafford
Journal:  J Environ Biol       Date:  2008-07

3.  Unravelling complexity in seagrass systems for management: Australia as a microcosm.

Authors:  Kieryn Kilminster; Kathryn McMahon; Michelle Waycott; Gary A Kendrick; Peter Scanes; Len McKenzie; Katherine R O'Brien; Mitchell Lyons; Angus Ferguson; Paul Maxwell; Tim Glasby; James Udy
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics.

Authors:  Hilary A Neckles; Richard L Wetzel; Robert J Orth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Epiphyte loads on seagrasses and microphytobenthos abundance are not reliable indicators of nutrient availability in oligotrophic coastal ecosystems.

Authors:  James W Fourqurean; Meredith F Muth; Joseph N Boyer
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Early warning response of Posidonia oceanica epiphyte community to environmental alterations (Ligurian Sea, NW Mediterranean).

Authors:  E Giovannetti; M Montefalcone; C Morri; C N Bianchi; G Albertelli
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  Physiological responses of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica as indicators of fish farm impact.

Authors:  Marta Pérez; Tania García; Olga Invers; Juan Manuel Ruiz
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  Recovery of a top predator mediates negative eutrophic effects on seagrass.

Authors:  Brent B Hughes; Ron Eby; Eric Van Dyke; M Tim Tinker; Corina I Marks; Kenneth S Johnson; Kerstin Wasson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Local competition and metapopulation processes drive long-term seagrass-epiphyte population dynamics.

Authors:  Delphine Lobelle; Emma J Kenyon; Kevan J Cook; James C Bull
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A meta-analysis of seaweed impacts on seagrasses: generalities and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Mads S Thomsen; Thomas Wernberg; Aschwin H Engelen; Fernando Tuya; Mat A Vanderklift; Marianne Holmer; Karen J McGlathery; Francisco Arenas; Jonne Kotta; Brian R Silliman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Macrophyte Community Response to Nitrogen Loading and Thermal Stressors in Rapidly Flushed Mesocosm Systems.

Authors:  James E Kaldy; Cheryl A Brown; Walter G Nelson; Melanie Frazier
Journal:  J Exp Mar Biol Ecol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.171

2.  Examining the dynamic nature of epiphytic microalgae in the Florida Keys: What factors influence community composition?

Authors:  Elena Stanca; Michael L Parsons
Journal:  J Exp Mar Biol Ecol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.476

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.