Literature DB >> 28313552

Detection of density dependence from annual censuses of bracken-feeding insects.

M Holyoak1, J H Lawton1,2.   

Abstract

A variety of techniques were used to test for density dependence in 32 time series from bracken-feeding insects. Seventeen taxa (primarily species, but including some pooled data from two or more closely related species whose larvae could not be distinguished in frond surveys) occurred on an open site; a woodland site held 15 taxa. For series of 12 years, collected on the open habitat, direct density dependence was detected by one or more of the techniques in 10 (58.8%) of 17 taxa, compared to only 5 (33.3%) of 15 taxa with time series of 8 years in length from the woodland habitat. Delayed density dependence was detected in 6 cases for the open site and in no cases at the woodland site. Either direct or delayed density dependence was found in 13 (76.5%) of 17 taxa for the open site and 13 (86.7%) of the 15 taxa which occurred on both sites. Although these results suggest a high frequency of density dependence in the species making up the bracken insect community, results from individual tests were extremely variable. Density dependence was detected least often by Vickery and Nudds' (1984) test, and most frequently by Varley and Gradwell's (1960) test, although the latter is prone to high rates of detecting spurious density dependence. Direct density dependence was detected most frequently in taxa that were univoltine and did not have delayed diapause, i.e. in those taxa whose life-histories conform most closely to the assumptions of the models underlying the analyses. Delayed density dependence occurred more frequently in species with more complex life-histories at the open site (taxa that were either bivoltine or multivoltine, or had delayed diapause). The results are consistent with the view that that the bracken herbivore assemblage consists of populations which are independently regulated by density dependent processes, although the present analyses suggest that we cannot rely on these tests to firmly show whether density dependence is present or not in an individual time series of the lengths considered here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bracken; Delayed density dependence; Density dependence; Insect populations; Time series

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313552     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The statistical analysis of density dependence.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Testing for density dependence : A cautionary note.

Authors:  Andrew R Solow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Testing for density-dependent effects in sequential censuses.

Authors:  William L Vickery; Thomas D Nudds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An evaluation of bias in k-factor analysis.

Authors:  William L Vickery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A test of statistical techniques for detecting density dependence in sequential censuses of animal populations.

Authors:  K J Gaston; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Models for testing : A secondary note.

Authors:  Johannes Reddingius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : I. Power estimates and estimation errors.

Authors:  J Reddingius; P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Inter- and intra-specific patterns of density dependence and population size variability in Salmoniformes.

Authors:  Ned A Dochtermann; Mary M Peacock
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  New insights into testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Avoiding erroneously high levels of detection in combinations of semi-independent tests : An application to testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A density-dependent model of Cirsium vulgare population dynamics using field-estimated parameter values.

Authors:  M Gillman; J M Bullock; J Silvertown; B Clear Hill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tests for density dependence revisited.

Authors:  David R Fox; James Ridsdill-Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Density dependence tests, are they?

Authors:  Henk Wolda; Brian Dennis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.