Literature DB >> 28312048

Testing for density-dependent effects in sequential censuses.

William L Vickery1, Thomas D Nudds2.   

Abstract

In response to Gaston and Lawton (1987), we evaluated the ability of four statistical procedures to detect density dependence. We used data from the same 16 populations as Gaston and Lawton (1987). In each population, density dependence had been previously established with techniques that use more extensive data. The major axis test (Slade 1977) was rarely (3 populations of 16) capable of detecting density dependence. The autocorrelation test (Bulmer 1975) detected density dependence in 5 of 16 species (14 of 59 tests overall). The randomization procedure (Pollard et al. 1987) detected density dependence in 7 of the 16 data sets (10 of 59 tests overall). The simulation procedure (Vickery and Nudds 1984) detected density dependence in 5 of the 16 data sets (11 of 59 tests overall). We suggest that not all annual census data taken from populations subject to density-dependent effects will actually show evidence of such effects. We conclude that Pollard et al. 's (1987) randomization procedure is the best test for detecting density dependence in sequential census data but it is not as powerful as more elaborate techniques (k-factor analysis, experimentation, etc.), nor is it meant to replace more extensive analyses.

Year:  1991        PMID: 28312048     DOI: 10.1007/BF00320619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  The statistical analysis of density dependence.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Detecting density dependence.

Authors:  M P Hassell
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  An evaluation of bias in k-factor analysis.

Authors:  William L Vickery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A test of statistical techniques for detecting density dependence in sequential censuses of animal populations.

Authors:  K J Gaston; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Density dependence and the stabilization of animal numbers : 3. The winter moth reconsidered.

Authors:  P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Do pupal predators regulate the winter moth?

Authors:  J Latto; M P Hassell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : I. Power estimates and estimation errors.

Authors:  J Reddingius; P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Chaos: detecting density dependence in imaginary worlds.

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  An evaluation of bias in k-factor analysis.

Authors:  William L Vickery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Density dependence, boundedness, and attraction: detecting stability in stochastic systems.

Authors:  P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  New insights into testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Avoiding erroneously high levels of detection in combinations of semi-independent tests : An application to testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variability and stability of a dragonfly assemblage.

Authors:  P H Crowley; D M Johnson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tests for density dependence revisited.

Authors:  David R Fox; James Ridsdill-Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Density dependence tests, are they?

Authors:  Henk Wolda; Brian Dennis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Detection of density dependence from annual censuses of bracken-feeding insects.

Authors:  M Holyoak; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Quantifying the nature and strength of intraspecific density dependence in Arctic mosquitoes.

Authors:  Melissa H DeSiervo; Matthew P Ayres; Lauren E Culler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.