Literature DB >> 28312047

An evaluation of bias in k-factor analysis.

William L Vickery1.   

Abstract

Randomization and simulation are used to detect bias in k-factor analysis. In nine previously published data sets there is strong evidence of bias. This may result from either non-independence of observations or the arithmetic relationship used to estimate k-factors, which can generate "spurious correlations". Randomization can be used to test for density dependence without bias. This procedure confirms the existence of densitydependent effects in 8 of the 9 populations and 11 of the 16 k-factors previously thought to have density-dependent effects.

Keywords:  Animal populations; Bias; Density dependence; k-factor analysis

Year:  1991        PMID: 28312047     DOI: 10.1007/BF00320618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Detecting density dependence.

Authors:  M P Hassell
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Density dependence and the stabilization of animal numbers : 1. The winter moth.

Authors:  P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Testing for density-dependent effects in sequential censuses.

Authors:  William L Vickery; Thomas D Nudds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A test of statistical techniques for detecting density dependence in sequential censuses of animal populations.

Authors:  K J Gaston; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Do pupal predators regulate the winter moth?

Authors:  J Latto; M P Hassell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Some misconceptions about the spurious correlation problem in the ecological literature.

Authors:  Yves T Prairie; David F Bird
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Chaos: detecting density dependence in imaginary worlds.

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Testing for density-dependent effects in sequential censuses.

Authors:  William L Vickery; Thomas D Nudds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Comment arising from a paper by Wolda and Dennis: using and interpreting the results of tests for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Density dependence, boundedness, and attraction: detecting stability in stochastic systems.

Authors:  P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  New insights into testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Avoiding erroneously high levels of detection in combinations of semi-independent tests : An application to testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Detection of density dependence from annual censuses of bracken-feeding insects.

Authors:  M Holyoak; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.