Literature DB >> 28313242

Models for testing : A secondary note.

Johannes Reddingius1.   

Abstract

This is a comment on a note by Solow (1990). It is shown that Solow's simulation results indicate that Bulmer's test for density dependence is non-robust to a particular kind of second-order Markovity that might well be overlooked by an ecologist. It is suggested that Solow's claim that Bulmer's test is insensitive is not wholly justified. Some scepticism concerning the applicability of statistical testing theory to animal population data is expressed.

Keywords:  Autoregressive process; Census data; Density dependence; Markovity

Year:  1990        PMID: 28313242     DOI: 10.1007/BF00324633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  The statistical analysis of density dependence.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : 2. Conforntation with data from the field.

Authors:  P J den Boer; J Reddingius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Testing for density dependence : A cautionary note.

Authors:  Andrew R Solow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : I. Power estimates and estimation errors.

Authors:  J Reddingius; P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Solow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Comment arising from a paper by Wolda and Dennis: using and interpreting the results of tests for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Density dependence, boundedness, and attraction: detecting stability in stochastic systems.

Authors:  P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The usefulness of the equilibrium concept in population dynamics : A reply to Berryman.

Authors:  Henk Wolda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Tests for density dependence revisited.

Authors:  David R Fox; James Ridsdill-Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tests for density dependence.

Authors:  J Reddingius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Multiple density dependence in two sub-populations of the amphipod Monoporeia affinis: a potential for alternative equilibria.

Authors:  Kjell Leonardsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Density dependence tests, are they?

Authors:  Henk Wolda; Brian Dennis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Detection of density dependence from annual censuses of bracken-feeding insects.

Authors:  M Holyoak; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.