Literature DB >> 28313093

Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions.

A W Illius1, I J Gordon2.   

Abstract

A simulation model is used to quantify relationships between diet quality, digestive processes and body weight in ungulate herbivores. Retention time of food in the digestive tract is shown by regression to scale with W0.27, and to be longer in ruminants than in hindgut fermenters. Allometric relationships between whole gut mean retention time (MRT, h) and weight (W) were: MRT=9.4 W0.255 (r 2=0.80) for hindgut fermenters and MRT=15.3 W0.251 (r 2=0.76) in ruminants. Longer retention of ingesta by large-bodied ruminants and hindgut fermenters increases digestive efficiency relative to small animals and permits them to survive on lower-quality foods. Compared with ruminants, hindgut fermenters' faster throughput is an advantage which outweighs their lower digestive efficiency, particularly on poor quality foods, provided that food resources are not limiting. This suggests that the predominance of ruminants in the middle range of body weights results from their more efficient use of scarce resources under conditions of resource depletion. Considering only physical limitations on intake, the model shows that the allometric coefficient which scales energy intake to body mass is 0.88 in ruminants and 0.82 in hindgut fermenters. The advantages of large body size are countered by disadvantages where food quantity is limited, and we suggest that the upper limit to ungulate body size is determined by the ability to extract nutrients from feeding niches during the nadir of the seasonal cycle of resource quality and abundance.

Keywords:  Body size; Evolution; Hindgut fermenter; Nutritional ecology; Ruminant

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313093     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Comparative nutrient extraction from forages by grazing bovids and equids: a test of the nutritional model of equid/bovid competition and coexistence.

Authors:  Patrick Duncan; T J Foose; I J Gordon; C G Gakahu; Monte Lloyd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  THE EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY OF THE EQUIDAE AND THE ORIGINS OF RUMEN AND CECAL DIGESTION.

Authors:  Christine Janis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes.

Authors:  M S Allen; D R Mertens
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Partitioning the nutrients of forage for horses.

Authors:  P V Fonnesbeck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Selection of vegetation components by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti National Park.

Authors:  M D Gwynne; R H Bell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Methods of measuring the energy metabolism of animals and interpretation of results obtained.

Authors:  K L Blaxter
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1971 Jul-Aug

7.  Dietary fiber components: relationship to the rate and extent of ruminal digestion.

Authors:  D R Mertens
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1977-02

8.  Investigations of the in situ bag technique and a comparison of the fermentation in heifers, sheep, ponies and rabbits.

Authors:  P Udén; P J Van Soest
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Volatile acid in the digesta of ruminants and other animals.

Authors:  S R ELSDEN; M W S HITCHCOCK
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1946-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Review article: equine nutrition. Comparisons of digestion coefficents obtained with cattle, sheep, rabbits and horses.

Authors:  H F Hintz
Journal:  Veterinarian       Date:  1969-04
  10 in total
  36 in total

1.  Miocene ungulates and terrestrial primary productivity: where have all the browsers gone?

Authors:  C M Janis; J Damuth; J M Theodor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Generalities in grazing and browsing ecology: using across-guild comparisons to control contingencies.

Authors:  Johan T du Toit; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Modeling metabolic costs of allelochemical ingestion by foraging herbivores.

Authors:  A W Illius; N S Jessop
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Seasonal dynamics of digestion in relation to diet quality and intake in European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).

Authors:  Øystein Holand
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Do larger individuals cope with resource fluctuations better? An artificial selection approach.

Authors:  Martino E Malerba; Maria M Palacios; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  No evidence for directional evolution of body mass in herbivorous theropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  Lindsay E Zanno; Peter J Makovicky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Early hominins evolved within non-analog ecosystems.

Authors:  J Tyler Faith; John Rowan; Andrew Du
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Foraging strategies and seasonal diet optimization of muskoxen in West Greenland.

Authors:  Mads C Forchhammer; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu.

Authors:  Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky; Hervé Fritz; Iain J Gordon; Andrew W Illius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.