Literature DB >> 28307354

Foraging strategies and seasonal diet optimization of muskoxen in West Greenland.

Mads C Forchhammer1, Jacobus J Boomsma1.   

Abstract

Various aspects of optimal foraging and seasonal diet composition of bulls (bachelor and dominant), cows, subadults, and yearlings of muskoxen Ovibos moschatus were investigated in West Greenland during the following seasons: calving, post-calving, summer, rut and mid-winter. The following hypotheses were tested: (1) muskoxen maximize daily energy intake during spring and summer, (2) dominant bulls monopolizing cows during the rutting season shift from an energy maximizing to a time minimizing foraging strategy in order to maximize the time available for reproductive activities, and (3) muskoxen employ a time minimizing foraging strategy during winter to conserve energy. As forage quality changed throughout the short Arctic growing season, muskoxen responded by changing the proportions of daily time spent feeding on graminoids (Cyperaceae, Poaceae) and dicots (Salix, Betula), respectively. This seasonal variation in the relative proportion of daily feeding time spent ingesting graminoids followed approximately the energy maximization prediction over the periods calving to rut. Neither time minimizing nor random foraging could explain the observed diets in this period, thus confirming hypothesis 1. Dominant bulls did not shift to the time minimizing strategy as predicted by hypothesis 2. However, during the pre-rutting and rutting seasons bulls deviated from the other sex/age classes by failing to obtain the daily maximum energy predicted by the model, as a result of a higher proportion of time allocated to agonistic and sexual behaviour. During winter, none of the sex/age classes employed a time minimizing strategy, so rejecting hypothesis 3. Instead, muskoxen were found to maximize Na intake, indicating that Na is of major importance for winter survival. The results emerging from a linear programming model with constraint settings varying over seasons confirm that the constraint parameters applied are indeed important limiting factors for muskoxen in natural populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet optimization; Foraging strategies; Herbivore; Linear programming; Muskox

Year:  1995        PMID: 28307354     DOI: 10.1007/BF00328582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions.

Authors:  A W Illius; I J Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A causal analysis of diet composition in free ranging cattle in reed-dominated vegetation.

Authors:  J T Vulink; H J Drost
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Optimal activity times and habitat choice of moose.

Authors:  Gary E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

Authors:  J Altmann
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.991

Review 6.  Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running.

Authors:  K Schmidt-Nielsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.570

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  How good must models and data be in ecology?

Authors:  Gary E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores.

Authors:  Eric Post; Christian Pedersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sequence Analysis of Bitter Taste Receptor Gene Repertoires in Different Ruminant Species.

Authors:  Ana Monteiro Ferreira; Andreia Tomás Marques; Mangesh Bhide; Vlatka Cubric-Curik; Kristin Hollung; Christopher Harold Knight; Katrine Raundrup; John Lippolis; Mitchell Palmer; Elvira Sales-Baptista; Susana Sousa Araújo; André Martinho de Almeida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  State-dependent foraging by caribou with different nutritional requirements.

Authors:  Kristin Denryter; Rachel C Cook; John G Cook; Katherine L Parker; Michael P Gillingham
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  An application of upscaled optimal foraging theory using hidden Markov modelling: year-round behavioural variation in a large arctic herbivore.

Authors:  Larissa T Beumer; Jennifer Pohle; Niels M Schmidt; Marianna Chimienti; Jean-Pierre Desforges; Lars H Hansen; Roland Langrock; Stine Højlund Pedersen; Mikkel Stelvig; Floris M van Beest
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.