Literature DB >> 28312938

Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency : An experiment.

Rolf Langvatn1, Thomas A Hanley2.   

Abstract

We tested the idea that ruminants allocate their feeding time to habitat patches in relation to foraging efficiency. We used five tame red deer (Cervus elaphus) in an enclosure planted with four treatment of timothy grass (Phleum pratense) differing in their stage of growth. Older swards offered higher biomass but lower nutritional quality than younger swards. We observed time spent feeding in each treatment during each of seven trials. We measured goodness-of-fit between observed times and predictions from two alternative hypotheses differing in optimization strategy (maximizing versus matching), and a third, null hypothesis. We tested the hypotheses using two alternative currecies: digestible protein, and digestible dry matter or energy. Although digestible protein concentration and dry-matter digestibility were highly correlated (r=0.763, P<0.001), the wider range of digestible protein made it the much more sensitive measure of forage quality. Distributions of feeding time closely matched estimated intake rates of digestible protein (R infPredsup2 =0.899) across all animals and trials. The other hypotheses were rejected. The results have important ecological implications in showing the underlying role of food in the selection of habitat by ruminants, and that simple, mechanistic models of forage intake and digestion can be scaled up to the level of animal behavioural choices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervus elaphus; Foraging ecology; Habitat selection; Herbivore-plant interactions; Ruminants

Year:  1993        PMID: 28312938     DOI: 10.1007/BF00323486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The ecology of foraging behavior: implications for animal learning and memory.

Authors:  A C Kamil; H L Roitblat
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 24.137

  2 in total
  10 in total

1.  Foraging strategy of cattle in patchy grassland.

Authors:  Michiel F Wallis de Vries; Cees Daleboudt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatial and temporal predictions of moose winter distribution.

Authors:  J Månsson; N Bunnefeld; H Andrén; G Ericsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Greening up the mountain.

Authors:  V Vandvik; A H Halbritter; R J Telford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A mathematical framework for optimal foraging of herbivores.

Authors:  S Focardi; P Marcellini
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Patch selection by red deer in relation to energy and protein intake: a re-evaluation of Langvatn and Hanley's (1993) results.

Authors:  John F Wilmshurst; John M Fryxell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer.

Authors:  L A Shipley; D E Spalinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Relationships between graminoid growth form and levels of grazing by caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Alaska.

Authors:  Eric S Post; David R Klein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Selection for nutrients by red deer hinds feeding on a mixed forest edge.

Authors:  Hélène Verheyden-Tixier; Pierre-Cyril Renaud; Nicolas Morellet; Jacqueline Jamot; Jean-Michel Besle; Bertrand Dumont
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Moose selecting for specific nutritional composition of birch places limits on food acceptability.

Authors:  Hilde K Wam; Annika M Felton; Caroline Stolter; Line Nybakken; Olav Hjeljord
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Behavioural change during dispersal and its relationship to survival and reproduction in a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Natasha D Harrison; Nino Maag; Paul J Haverkamp; André Ganswindt; Marta B Manser; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Arpat Ozgul; Gabriele Cozzi
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.091

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.