Literature DB >> 18357470

Selection for nutrients by red deer hinds feeding on a mixed forest edge.

Hélène Verheyden-Tixier1, Pierre-Cyril Renaud, Nicolas Morellet, Jacqueline Jamot, Jean-Michel Besle, Bertrand Dumont.   

Abstract

We studied the nutritional behaviour of hinds foraging on a mixed-forest edge by direct observation of their choices at each season and by measuring nutrient concentration in the plants. We compared nutrient concentrations in the observed diets with those in the total available vegetation, and with those of 1,000 randomly simulated diets in which we included only those plants that were actually eaten by the animal. Whether the available or the consumed feeds were used as the basis for comparisons had important consequences due to the presence of conifers and ferns, which were high in soluble sugars but were never eaten by the animals (potentially due to their toxicity). The selected diets were lower in sugars than the total available vegetation in summer, but were actually higher in sugars than the random diets generated from consumed forage species only. Hind diets contained more soluble sugars but not more protein than simulated diets in all seasons. Contrary to our prediction, anti-nutritional compounds (ADL and tannins) were avoided only in winter. Compared to simulated diets, hinds consumed more tannins in spring and summer and more ADL in summer and autumn. We suggest that this was a consequence of selection for soluble sugars, because the preferred plant species, which had high soluble sugar concentrations, also contained a large proportion of the anti-nutritional compounds eaten. In winter, the grass-dominated diets contained more fibre (NDF) and less ADL than the simulated diets, indicating that hinds orient their feeding towards digestible fibres. The switch from a browser to a grazer diet was related to a change in the availability of the nutrients, mainly soluble sugars. In our study, grasses contained more soluble sugars and proteins than deciduous browse during winter. This calls into question the dichotomy usually assumed in the literature between grass and browse in terms of nutrient content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18357470     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1020-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Morphological variability of forestomach mucosal membrane in red deer, fallow deer, roe deer and mouflon.

Authors:  J Kamler
Journal:  Small Rumin Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 2.  Salivary proteins as a defense against dietary tannins.

Authors:  Takuya Shimada
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Notes on sugar determination.

Authors:  M SMOGYI
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1952-03       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Radial diffusion method for determining tannin in plant extracts.

Authors:  A E Hagerman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system.

Authors:  R R Hofmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency : An experiment.

Authors:  Rolf Langvatn; Thomas A Hanley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A comparison of food preferences and nutrient composition in captive squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus, and pigtail macaques, Macaca nemestrina.

Authors:  M Laska
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-05

8.  Patch selection by red deer in relation to energy and protein intake: a re-evaluation of Langvatn and Hanley's (1993) results.

Authors:  John F Wilmshurst; John M Fryxell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Captive roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) select for low amounts of tannic acid but not quebracho: fluctuation of preferences and potential benefits.

Authors:  Marcus Clauss; Karin Lason; Janin Gehrke; Matthias Lechner-Doll; Jörns Fickel; Tilman Grune; W Jürgen Streich
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Tannin-binding proteins in saliva of deer and their absence in saliva of sheep and cattle.

Authors:  P J Austin; L A Suchar; C T Robbins; A E Hagerman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of grass and browse consumption on the winter mass dynamics of elk.

Authors:  David Christianson; Scott Creel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Benefits for dominant red deer hinds under a competitive feeding system: food access behavior, diet and nutrient selection.

Authors:  Francisco Ceacero; Andrés J García; Tomás Landete-Castillejos; Jitka Bartošová; Ludek Bartoš; Laureano Gallego
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Avoiding toxic levels of essential minerals: a forgotten factor in deer diet preferences.

Authors:  Francisco Ceacero; Tomás Landete-Castillejos; Augusto Olguín; María Miranda; Andrés García; Alberto Martínez; Jorge Cassinello; Valentín Miguel; Laureano Gallego
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Drivers of diet selection of critically endangered Western Derby eland during the food shortage period within conservation breeding in Senegal.

Authors:  Pavla Hejcmanová; Magdalena Miřejovská; Petr Homolka; Michal Hejcman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community.

Authors:  Claire Redjadj; Gaëlle Darmon; Daniel Maillard; Thierry Chevrier; Denis Bastianelli; Hélène Verheyden; Anne Loison; Sonia Saïd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.