Literature DB >> 22437909

Spatial and temporal predictions of moose winter distribution.

J Månsson1, N Bunnefeld, H Andrén, G Ericsson.   

Abstract

Herbivores are usually distributed unevenly across the landscape often because of variation in resource availability. We used zero-inflated generalised additive models (to account for data with a high number of zeros) that include georeferences to predict winter distribution of a large herbivore (moose Alces alces). Moose distribution was analysed in relation to forage availability and distance to neighbouring sites. Our results showed that the ability to explain moose distribution indexed by pellet count data at a local scale increased when spatial information (longitude and latitude) was added to the model compared to the model only including food availability. By using the relationship between moose and forage distribution, and the spatial information, we predicted patch choice by moose reasonably well in 2 out of 4 years. However, the distribution of moose was also influenced by weather conditions, as it was most clumped in the year with most snow. In conclusion, our study lends support for a non-linear approach using georeferences for a comprehensive understanding of herbivore distribution at a small scale. This result also indicates that the use of a certain patch by moose not only depends on the selected patch itself but is also influenced by the neighbouring patch and factors at a larger spatial scale, such as moose management influencing the density above moose home range level. The relatively high proportion of unexplained variation suggests that the use of a certain patch is also influenced by other factors such as topography, predation, competition, weather conditions, and wildlife management strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22437909     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2305-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Summarizing the predictive power of a generalized linear model.

Authors:  B Zheng; A Agresti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Defining herbivore assemblages in the Kruger National Park: a correlative coherence approach.

Authors:  J V Redfern; S J Ryan; W M Getz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Fine-scale predation risk on elk after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park, USA.

Authors:  Joshua S Halofsky; William J Ripple
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Regression analysis of spatial data.

Authors:  Colin M Beale; Jack J Lennon; Jon M Yearsley; Mark J Brewer; David A Elston
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation?

Authors:  Nils Bunnefeld; Eriko Hoshino; Eleanor J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency : An experiment.

Authors:  Rolf Langvatn; Thomas A Hanley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Spatial heterogeneity in resource distribution promotes facultative sociality in two trans-Saharan migratory birds.

Authors:  Ainara Cortés-Avizanda; Pablo Almaraz; Martina Carrete; José A Sánchez-Zapata; Antonio Delgado; Fernando Hiraldo; José A Donázar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Species distribution of kobs (Kobus kob) in the Shai Hills Resource Reserve: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Raymond Agyepong Antwi; Erasmus Henaku Owusu; Daniel Korley Attuquayefio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden.

Authors:  Adam Felton; Urban Nilsson; Johan Sonesson; Annika M Felton; Jean-Michel Roberge; Thomas Ranius; Martin Ahlström; Johan Bergh; Christer Björkman; Johanna Boberg; Lars Drössler; Nils Fahlvik; Peichen Gong; Emma Holmström; E Carina H Keskitalo; Maartje J Klapwijk; Hjalmar Laudon; Tomas Lundmark; Mats Niklasson; Annika Nordin; Maria Pettersson; Jan Stenlid; Anna Sténs; Kristina Wallertz
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Behavioral effects of wolf presence on moose habitat selection: testing the landscape of fear hypothesis in an anthropogenic landscape.

Authors:  Håkan Sand; Mark Jamieson; Henrik Andrén; Camilla Wikenros; Joris Cromsigt; Johan Månsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.