Literature DB >> 28306920

Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer.

L A Shipley1, D E Spalinger1.   

Abstract

We examined the functional response and foraging behavior of young moose (Alces alces) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) relative to animal size and the size and distribution of browse patches. The animals were offered one, three, or nine stems of dormant red maple (Acer rubrum) in hand-assembled patches spaced 2.33, 7, 14, or 21 m apart along a runway. Moose took larger twig diameters and bites and had greater dry matter and digestible energy intake rates than did deer, but had lower cropping rates. Moose and deer travelled at similar velocities between patches and took similar numbers of bites per stem. We found that a model of intake rate, based on the mechanics of cropping, chewing, and encountering bites, effectively described the intake rate of moose and deer feeding in heterogeneous distributions of browses. As patch size and density declined, the animals walked faster between patches, cropped larger bites, and cropped more bites per stem, and hence, dry matter intake rates remained relatively constant. As is characteristic of many hardwood browse stems, however, potential digestible energy concentration of the red maple stems declined as the size and number of bites removed (i.e., stem diameter at point of clipping) by the animals increased. Therefore, the digestible energy content of the diet declined with decreasing patch size and density. Time spent foraging within a patch increased as patch size increased and as distance between patches increased, which qualitatively supported the marginal-value theorem. However, actual patch residence times for deer and moose exceeded those predicted by the marginal-value theorem (MVT) by approximately 250%. The difference between actual and predicted residence time may have been a result of (1) an unknown or complex gain function, (2) the artificial conditions of the experiments, or (3) assumptions of MVT that do not apply to herbivores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bite size; Foraging behavior; Herbivores; Marginal-value theorem; Patch

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306920     DOI: 10.1007/BF00365569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response.

Authors:  D E Spalinger; N T Hobbs
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency : An experiment.

Authors:  Rolf Langvatn; Thomas A Hanley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of plant spinescence on large mammalian herbivores.

Authors:  Susan M Cooper; Norman Owen-Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Diet switching in a generalist mammalian folivore: fundamental to maximising intake.

Authors:  Natasha L Wiggins; Clare McArthur; Noel W Davies
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatial context influences patch residence time in foraging hierarchies.

Authors:  Kate R Searle; Thea Vandervelde; N Thompson Hobbs; Lisa A Shipley; Bruce A Wunder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The balancing act of foraging: mammalian herbivores trade-off multiple risks when selecting food patches.

Authors:  M J Camp; L A Shipley; T R Johnson; P J Olsoy; J S Forbey; J L Rachlow; D H Thornton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Using eDNA to experimentally test ungulate browsing preferences.

Authors:  Ruth V Nichols; Joris P G M Cromsigt; Göran Spong
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-09-10

5.  Different facets of tree sapling diversity influence browsing intensity by deer dependent on spatial scale.

Authors:  Bettina Ohse; Carolin Seele; Frédéric Holzwarth; Christian Wirth
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.