Literature DB >> 28313720

Density dependence, boundedness, and attraction: detecting stability in stochastic systems.

P H Crowley1.   

Abstract

By analogy with deterministic stability, the stability of stochastic ecological systems can be viewed as a tendency for population densities to avoid dynamic boundaries (i.e. boundedness) or to approach a dynamic attractor (i.e. attraction). At the population level, these two views generate predictions consistent with density dependence. I therefore devised two new statistical tests of attraction, the "random-walk attraction test" and the "randomized attraction test"; I then used them successfully, along with randomization techniques that detect boundedness and two autocorrelation methods, to test for density dependence in published sequences of population densities. The attraction tests identify the apparent attractor, the band of densities toward which density tends to shift between generations. Locating the apparent attractor can generate a prediction of the next direction of density change; for data from a dragonfly assemblage, about 80% of these predictions were correct. From the single-population tests, I also developed two multispecies tests of attraction (the multispecies random-walk and randomized attraction tests) and two multispecies tests of boundedness (the multispecies permutation and randomization tests). These detected attraction and boundedness in the dragonfly assemblage and attraction in a collection of laboratory fruitfly populations. An evaluation of the statistical power of the new density attraction tests indicates a strong dependence on the sequence length n and on the number of populations m: power increases with n and particularly with m. Nevertheless, detecting attraction becomes likely even in populations with strong linear density-dependence only with n>30 or for shorter sequences in multispecies assemblages.

Keywords:  Population and community dynamics; Random walk; Randomization; Resilience; Statistical tests

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313720     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : 2. Conforntation with data from the field.

Authors:  P J den Boer; J Reddingius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Testing for density dependence : A cautionary note.

Authors:  Andrew R Solow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : 3. What do we conclude from significant test results?

Authors:  P J Den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Models for testing : A secondary note.

Authors:  Johannes Reddingius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing : I. Power estimates and estimation errors.

Authors:  J Reddingius; P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Seeing the trees for the wood: random walks or bounded fluctuations of population size?

Authors:  P J den Boer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  [An integrated theory of natural control of animal populations].

Authors:  F Schwerdtfeger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The meaning of stability.

Authors:  R C Lewontin
Journal:  Brookhaven Symp Biol       Date:  1969

9.  Spatially distributed stochasticity and the constancy of ecosystems.

Authors:  P H Crowley
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. I. Logistic-type models.

Authors:  S Ellner
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  6 in total

1.  Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Comment arising from a paper by Wolda and Dennis: using and interpreting the results of tests for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  New insights into testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Avoiding erroneously high levels of detection in combinations of semi-independent tests : An application to testing for density dependence.

Authors:  M Holyoak; P H Crowley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Tests for density dependence revisited.

Authors:  David R Fox; James Ridsdill-Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Multiple density dependence in two sub-populations of the amphipod Monoporeia affinis: a potential for alternative equilibria.

Authors:  Kjell Leonardsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.