Literature DB >> 16705439

Spatial context influences patch residence time in foraging hierarchies.

Kate R Searle1, Thea Vandervelde, N Thompson Hobbs, Lisa A Shipley, Bruce A Wunder.   

Abstract

Understanding responses of organisms to spatial heterogeneity in resources has emerged as a fundamentally important challenge in contemporary ecology. We examined responses of foraging herbivores to multi-scale heterogeneity in plants. We asked the question, "Is the behavior observed at coarse scales in a patch hierarchy the collective outcome of fine scale behaviors or, alternatively, does the spatial context at coarse scales entrain fine scale behavior?" To address this question we created a nested, two-level patch hierarchy. We examined the effects of the spatial context surrounding a patch on the amount of time herbivores resided in the patch. We developed a set of competing models predicting residence time as a function of the mass of plants contained in a patch and the distance between patches and examined the strength of evidence in our observations for these models. Models that included patch mass and inter-patch distance as independent variables successfully predicted observed residence times (bears: r (2)=0.67-0.76 and mule deer: r (2)=0.33-0.55). Residence times of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) responded to the spatial context surrounding a patch. Evidence ratios of Akaike weights demonstrated that models containing effects of higher levels in the hierarchy on residence time at lower levels received up to 34 times more support in the data than models that failed to consider the higher level context for grizzly bears and up to 48 times more support for mule deer. We conclude that foraging by large herbivores is influenced by more than one level of heterogeneity in patch hierarchies and that simple empirical models offer a viable alternative to optimal foraging models for the prediction of patch residence times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16705439     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0285-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Alternatives to statistical hypothesis testing in ecology: a guide to self teaching.

Authors:  N Thompson Hobbs; Ray Hilborn
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response.

Authors:  D E Spalinger; N T Hobbs
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Winter foraging by muskoxen: a hierarchical approach to patch residence time and cratering behaviour.

Authors:  J A Schaefer; F Messier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The importance of scale of patchiness for selectivity in grazing herbivores.

Authors:  M F WallisDeVries; Emilio A Laca; Montague W Demment
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Foraging across a variable landscape: behavioral decisions made by woodland caribou at multiple spatial scales.

Authors:  Chris J Johnson; Katherine L Parker; Douglas C Heard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer.

Authors:  L A Shipley; D E Spalinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Trade-offs between social behaviour and foraging by sheep in heterogeneous pastures.

Authors:  A M. Sibbald; R J. Hooper
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Foraging behaviour in guinea pigs: further tests of the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  M H Cassini; G Lichtenstein; J P Ongay; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.777

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Macaques are risk-averse in a freely moving foraging task.

Authors:  Benjamin R Eisenreich; Benjamin Y Hayden; Jan Zimmermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Resource heterogeneity and foraging behaviour of cattle across spatial scales.

Authors:  Santiago A Utsumi; Carlos A Cangiano; Julio R Galli; Mary B McEachern; Montague W Demment; Emilio A Laca
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.