Literature DB >> 16328546

Diet switching in a generalist mammalian folivore: fundamental to maximising intake.

Natasha L Wiggins1, Clare McArthur, Noel W Davies.   

Abstract

Generalist mammalian herbivores exploit a diverse diet. A generalised feeding strategy utilises a mixed diet to obtain a range of nutrients and to reduce the detoxication load of similar groups of plant secondary metabolites (PSMs). There is limited research investigating how mammalian herbivores achieve this dietary mixing in their daily foraging activities. We investigated the patterns of, and behaviours associated with, dietary mixing in a generalist mammalian folivore, the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Possums were offered foliage of two eucalypt species (Eucalyptus globulus and E. regnans) as either (a) Full choice: both species offered for 8 h; (b) Restricted choice: both species offered for 2x2 h blocks; (c) G-R no choice: E. globulus offered for the first 4 h, E. regnans offered for next 4 h; and (d) R-G no choice: E. regnans offered for first 4 h, E. globulus offered for next 4 h. We hypothesised that possums would maximise intake on the Full choice diet, where time availability was greatest in combination with a choice of foliage. We also hypothesised that diet switching, defined as the frequency of changing between food types while feeding, would play a fundamental role in maximising intake. Possums achieved maximum intake on the Full choice diet and minimum intake on the No choice diets. Although intake was similar between the Restricted choice and No choice diets, possums achieved this intake in half the amount of time when able to switch regularly between foliage on the Restricted choice diet. We conclude that a generalist herbivore's ability to effectively switch diets when foraging is fundamental to maximising intake. Hence, the degree of plant heterogeneity in an environment, and the spatial scale at which it occurs, may affect an herbivore's foraging decisions and, ultimately, influence its foraging efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328546     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0305-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Plant secondary metabolites as mammalian feeding deterrents: separating the effects of the taste of salicin from its post-ingestive consequences in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  G J Pass; W J Foley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Inheritance of resistance to mammalian herbivores and of plant defensive chemistry in an Eucalyptus species.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Reilly-Wapstra; Brad M Potts; Clare McArthur; Noel W Davies; Paul Tilyard
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer.

Authors:  L A Shipley; D E Spalinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of two plant secondary metabolites, cineole and gallic acid, on nightly feeding patterns of the common brushtail possum.

Authors:  Natasha L Wiggins; Clare McArthur; Stuart McLean; Rebecca Boyle
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.626

  4 in total
  17 in total

1.  Spatially complex neighboring relationships among grassland plant species as an effective mechanism of defense against herbivory.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Deli Wang; Yuguang Bai; Yue Huang; Meng Fan; Jushan Liu; Yexing Li
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Landscape-scale feeding patterns of African elephant inferred from carbon isotope analysis of feces.

Authors:  Jacqueline Codron; Daryl Codron; Julia A Lee-Thorp; Matt Sponheimer; Kevin Kirkman; Kevin J Duffy; Judith Sealy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  An in vivo assay for elucidating the importance of cytochromes P450 for the ability of a wild mammalian herbivore (Neotoma lepida) to consume toxic plants.

Authors:  Michele M Skopec; Jael R Malenke; James R Halpert; M Denise Dearing
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.247

Review 4.  The detoxification limitation hypothesis: where did it come from and where is it going?

Authors:  Karen J Marsh; Ian R Wallis; Rose L Andrew; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Influences of plant toxins and their spatial distribution on foraging by the common brushtail possum, a generalist mammalian herbivore.

Authors:  Carolyn L Nersesian; Peter B Banks; Clare McArthur
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  A pharm-ecological perspective of terrestrial and aquatic plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer Sorensen Forbey; M Denise Dearing; Elisabeth M Gross; Colin M Orians; Erik E Sotka; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.

Authors:  Clare McArthur; Peter B Banks; Rudy Boonstra; Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Behavioral responses of a generalist mammalian folivore to the physiological constraints of a chemically defended diet.

Authors:  Natasha L Wiggins; Clare McArthur; Noel W Davies; Stuart McLean
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Population divergence in the ontogenetic trajectories of foliar terpenes of a Eucalyptus species.

Authors:  Christina L Borzak; Brad M Potts; Noel W Davies; Julianne M O'Reilly-Wapstra
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Niche construction and Dreaming logic: aboriginal patch mosaic burning and varanid lizards (Varanus gouldii) in Australia.

Authors:  Rebecca Bliege Bird; Nyalangka Tayor; Brian F Codding; Douglas W Bird
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.