Literature DB >> 26037523

Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.

Janet Therrien1, Charles J Mason2, Jonathan A Cale1, Aaron Adams2, Brian H Aukema3, Cameron R Currie4, Kenneth F Raffa2, Nadir Erbilgin5.   

Abstract

Bark beetles are associated with diverse communities of symbionts. Although fungi have received significant attention, we know little about how bacteria, and in particular their interactions with fungi, affect bark beetle reproduction. We tested how interactions between four bacterial associates, two symbiotic fungi, and two opportunistic fungi affect performance of mountain pine beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae) in host tissue. We compared beetle performance in phloem of its historical host, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), and its novel host recently accessed through warming climate, jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Overall, beetles produced more larvae, and established longer ovipositional and larval galleries in host tissue predominantly colonized by the symbiotic fungi, Grosmannia clavigera, or Ophiostoma montium than by the opportunistic colonizer Aspergillus and to a lesser extent, Trichoderma. This occurred in both historical and naïve hosts. Impacts of bacteria on beetle reproduction depended on particular fungus-bacterium combinations and host species. Some bacteria, e.g., Pseudomonas sp. D4-22 and Hy4T4 in P. contorta and Pseudomonas sp. Hy4T4 and Stenotrophomonas in P. banksiana, reduced antagonistic effects by Aspergillus and Trichoderma resulting in more larvae and longer ovipositional and larval galleries. These effects were not selective, as bacteria also reduced beneficial effects by symbionts in both host species. Interestingly, Bacillus enhanced antagonistic effects by Aspergillus in both hosts. These results demonstrate that bacteria influence brood development of bark beetles in host tissue. They also suggest that climate-driven range expansion of D. ponderosae through the boreal forest will not be significantly constrained by requirements of, or interactions among, its microbial associates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Bark beetles; Fungi; Host colonization; Invasion biology; Jack pine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037523     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3356-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  44 in total

1.  Interactions among Scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers.

Authors:  T D Paine; K F Raffa; T C Harrington
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Temperature determines symbiont abundance in a multipartite bark beetle-fungus ectosymbiosis.

Authors:  D L Six; B J Bentz
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  The role of temperature variability in stabilizing the mountain pine beetle-fungus mutualism.

Authors:  A L Addison; J A Powell; D L Six; M Moore; B J Bentz
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  The role of mites in insect-fungus associations.

Authors:  R W Hofstetter; J C Moser
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naïve host ecosystem.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; Cary Ma; Caroline Whitehouse; Bin Shan; Ahmed Najar; Maya Evenden
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Phylogeographic structure of jack pine (Pinus banksiana; Pinaceae) supports the existence of a coastal glacial refugium in northeastern North America.

Authors:  Julie Godbout; Jean Beaulieu; Jean Bousquet
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Mountain pine beetles colonizing historical and naive host trees are associated with a bacterial community highly enriched in genes contributing to terpene metabolism.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Frank O Aylward; Sandye M Adams; Nadir Erbilgin; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Garret Suen; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Celia K Boone; Jörg Bohlmann; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Aspen defense chemicals influence midgut bacterial community composition of gypsy moth.

Authors:  Charles J Mason; Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; Richard L Lindroth; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with bark beetles.

Authors:  J R Bridges
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.552

View more
  8 in total

1.  Direction of interaction between mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and resource-sharing wood-boring beetles depends on plant parasite infection.

Authors:  Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Fungal Volatiles Can Act as Carbon Sources and Semiochemicals to Mediate Interspecific Interactions Among Bark Beetle-Associated Fungal Symbionts.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cale; R Maxwell Collignon; Jennifer G Klutsch; Sanat S Kanekar; Altaf Hussain; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bacterial volatile ammonia regulates the consumption sequence of d-pinitol and d-glucose in a fungus associated with an invasive bark beetle.

Authors:  Fangyuan Zhou; Letian Xu; Shanshan Wang; Bo Wang; Qiaozhe Lou; Min Lu; Jianghua Sun
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 4.  Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Fungal Associates of Conifer Bark Beetles and their Potential in Bark Beetle Control.

Authors:  Dineshkumar Kandasamy; Jonathan Gershenzon; Almuth Hammerbacher
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Discovery of Phloeophagus Beetles as a Source of Pseudomonas Strains That Produce Potentially New Bioactive Substances and Description of Pseudomonas bohemica sp. nov.

Authors:  Zaki Saati-Santamaría; Rubén López-Mondéjar; Alejandro Jiménez-Gómez; Alexandra Díez-Méndez; Tomáš Větrovský; José M Igual; Encarna Velázquez; Miroslav Kolarik; Raúl Rivas; Paula García-Fraile
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Evidence for Succession and Putative Metabolic Roles of Fungi and Bacteria in the Farming Mutualism of the Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus affinis.

Authors:  L A Ibarra-Juarez; M A J Burton; P H W Biedermann; L Cruz; D Desgarennes; E Ibarra-Laclette; A Latorre; A Alonso-Sánchez; E Villafan; G Hanako-Rosas; L López; M Vázquez-Rosas-Landa; G Carrion; D Carrillo; A Moya; A Lamelas
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.496

7.  Unravelling the gut bacteriome of Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): identifying core bacterial assemblage and their ecological relevance.

Authors:  Amrita Chakraborty; Muhammad Zubair Ashraf; Roman Modlinger; Jiří Synek; Fredrik Schlyter; Amit Roy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Insights into the Divergence of Chinese Ips Bark Beetles during Evolutionary Adaptation.

Authors:  Huicong Du; Jiaxing Fang; Xia Shi; Chunmei Yu; Mei Deng; Sufang Zhang; Fu Liu; Zhen Zhang; Fuzhong Han; Xiangbo Kong
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.