Literature DB >> 28301777

Vertebral Body Compression Fractures and Bone Density: Automated Detection and Classification on CT Images.

Joseph E Burns1, Jianhua Yao1, Ronald M Summers1.   

Abstract

Purpose To create and validate a computer system with which to detect, localize, and classify compression fractures and measure bone density of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies on computed tomographic (CT) images. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was waived in this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. A CT study set of 150 patients (mean age, 73 years; age range, 55-96 years; 92 women, 58 men) with (n = 75) and without (n = 75) compression fractures was assembled. All case patients were age and sex matched with control subjects. A total of 210 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae showed compression fractures and were electronically marked and classified by a radiologist. Prototype fully automated spinal segmentation and fracture detection software were then used to analyze the study set. System performance was evaluated with free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Sensitivity for detection or localization of compression fractures was 95.7% (201 of 210; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.0%, 98.9%), with a false-positive rate of 0.29 per patient. Additionally, sensitivity was 98.7% and specificity was 77.3% at case-based receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Accuracy for classification by Genant type (anterior, middle, or posterior height loss) was 0.95 (107 of 113; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.98), with weighted κ of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.99). Accuracy for categorization by Genant height loss grade was 0.68 (77 of 113; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.76), with a weighted κ of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.71). The average bone attenuation for T12-L4 vertebrae was 146 HU ± 29 (standard deviation) in case patients and 173 HU ± 42 in control patients; this difference was statistically significant (P < .001). Conclusion An automated machine learning computer system was created to detect, anatomically localize, and categorize vertebral compression fractures at high sensitivity and with a low false-positive rate, as well as to calculate vertebral bone density, on CT images. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28301777      PMCID: PMC5584647          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  30 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: importance of recognition and description by radiologists.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Lee F Rogers; Pierre D Delmas; Harry K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  G C Anselmetti; M Muto; Giuseppe Guglielmi; S Masala
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; C Rowan Debold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Vertebral morphometry.

Authors:  Daniele Diacinti; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Opportunistic Identification of Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using specialized workflow software for 6-point morphometry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Francesco Palmieri; Maria Grazia Placentino; Francesco D'Errico; Luca Pio Stoppino
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 10.  Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; J Li; C Y Wu; J A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  34 in total

1.  Vertebral fracture prevalence and measurement of the scanographic bone attenuation coefficient on CT-scan in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Marine Fauny; Elodie Bauer; Eliane Albuisson; Julia Perrier-Cornet; Joëlle Deibener; François Chabot; Damien Mandry; Olivier Huttin; Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere; Damien Loeuille
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Y W Lui; P D Chang; G Zaharchuk; D P Barboriak; A E Flanders; M Wintermark; C P Hess; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating malignant from benign compressed vertebrae.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Fatma Mohamed Sherif
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Dana Lin; Florian Knoll; Ankur M Doshi; Tatiane Cantarelli Rodrigues; Michael P Recht
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  A Brief History of Machine Learning in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Andrew T Schilling; Pavan P Shah; James Feghali; Adrian E Jimenez; Tej D Azad
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Yi Yang; Yi-Wei Shen; Ke-Rui Zhang; Ze-Kun Jiang; Li-Tai Ma; Chen Ding; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  Automated Abdominal CT Imaging Biomarkers for Opportunistic Prediction of Future Major Osteoporotic Fractures in Asymptomatic Adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Ryan Zea; Scott J Lee; Jiamin Liu; Veit Sandfort; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Opportunistic Screening at Abdominal CT: Use of Automated Body Composition Biomarkers for Added Cardiometabolic Value.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Alberto A Perez; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel C Elton; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Failure Mode Analysis of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures.

Authors:  A F Voter; M E Larson; J W Garrett; J-P J Yu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  CT Cervical Spine Fracture Detection Using a Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  J E Small; P Osler; A B Paul; M Kunst
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.