Literature DB >> 16172798

Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice.

John T Schousboe1, C Rowan Debold.   

Abstract

Absorptiometry of the thoraco-lumbar spine at the time of bone densitometry to detect vertebral deformities consistent with fracture is now available. The performance of absorptiometry in clinical practice compared to radiography has not been fully established, especially in the presence of osteoarthritis or scoliosis. Our first objective was to compare absorptiometry to radiography for detection of vertebral deformity in elderly women who were referred for bone densitometry with or without scoliosis or disc space osteoarthritis excluded. Our second objective was to assess the effect of osteoarthritis and scoliosis on the inter-rater reliability of both technologies. The study group comprised two hundred five women age 65 and older referred for bone densitometry in a large multispecialty group practice. Lateral and antero-posterior (AP) absorptiometry images and lateral spine radiographs were obtained on all participants. The vertebrae on all images were evaluated for vertebral deformity by two observers according to the Genant semiquantitative criteria who were blinded to each other's readings. Disc spaces were evaluated on radiographs for osteoarthritis. Absorptiometry AP images were evaluated for scoliosis. In the absence of scoliosis, the sensitivity and specificity of absorptiometry for persons with one or more radiographic grade 2-3 deformities (>25% reduction of vertebral height) for the two readers were 87-93% and 93-95%, respectively. The inter-rater reliability of absorptiometry improved in the absence of moderate or severe disc space osteoarthritis. A strategy of absorptiometry with follow-up radiography only in those with scoliosis or apparent grade 2 deformity accurately identifies those with prevalent grade 2 or 3 deformity on radiography (accuracy 0.98 and kappa 0.86 for reader 1; accuracy 0.99 and kappa 0.92 for reader 2). Lateral and AP absorptiometry imaging of the spine with selective follow-up radiography accurately identifies elderly women with vertebral deformity consistent with moderate or severe fracture, but extra caution is necessary when evaluating vertebrae in the presence of adjacent disc space osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172798     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-2010-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity.

Authors:  J A Rea; J Li; G M Blake; P Steiger; H K Genant; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of analysis precision in normal and osteoporotic subjects.

Authors:  J A Rea; M B Chen; J Li; E Potts; B Fan; G M Blake; P Steiger; I G Smith; H K Genant; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Identification of vertebral deformities in men: comparison of morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Ferrar; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; D Krueger; R Gangnon; H K Genant; M K Drezner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; N A Barrington; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  N E Lane; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; M C Hochberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Clinical utility of dual-energy vertebral assessment (DVA).

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Larry B Dixon; Murray J Favus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; J Li; C Y Wu; J A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Instant vertebral assessment: a noninvasive dual X-ray absorptiometry technique to avoid misclassification and clinical mismanagement of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; E von Stetten; S K Emond; L Jones; R A Parker
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  70 in total

1.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment in the assessment of vertebral fractures: technical limits and software accuracy.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Giuseppe Battista; Ugo Albisinni; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Height loss, vertebral fractures, and the misclassification of osteoporosis.

Authors:  WanWan Xu; Subashan Perera; Donna Medich; Gail Fiorito; Julie Wagner; Loretta K Berger; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound based techniques.

Authors:  Paola Pisani; Maria Daniela Renna; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Maurizio Muratore; Eugenio Quarta; Marco Di Paola; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 5.  The Utility of DXA Assessment at the Forearm, Proximal Femur, and Lateral Distal Femur, and Vertebral Fracture Assessment in the Pediatric Population: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Use of a performance algorithm improves utilization of vertebral fracture assessment in clinical practice.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; F McKiernan; J T Fuehrer; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Observer agreement in pediatric semiquantitative vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Kerry Siminoski; Brian Lentle; Mary Ann Matzinger; Nazih Shenouda; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-10

8.  Simplified criteria for selecting patients for vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  Sharon H Chou; Tamara J Vokes; Siu-Ling Ma; Maureen Costello; Harold R Rosen; John T Schousboe
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 9.  Use of DXA-based technology for detection and assessment of risk of vertebral fracture in rheumatology practice.

Authors:  Michael Maricic
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Influence of non-traumatic thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures on sagittal spine alignment assessed by radiation-free spinometry.

Authors:  M Krause; S Breer; B Mohrmann; E Vettorazzi; R P Marshall; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.