Literature DB >> 28299549

Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age.

Samer Tannus1, Weon-Young Son2, Michael Haim Dahan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate reproductive outcomes following elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT) compared with those of double blastocyst transfer (DBT) in advanced maternal age.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an academic fertility center. All women aged 40 and over for whom in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were performed and in whom embryo culture was extended to the blastocyst stage were reviewed for possible inclusion. Exclusion criteria included the following: women with >3 previous IVF cycles, the use of donor or frozen oocytes, preimplantation genetic diagnosis/preimplantation genetic screening cycles, and cycles in which embryos did not reach the blastocyst stage on day 5. The study included 310 women; 148 were included in the eSBT group and 162 were included in the DBT group. Live birth rate (LBR) was the main outcome. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression, controlling for confounders. These confounders were embryo expansion, embryo quality, and the number of previous IVF cycles.
RESULTS: The mean age of the whole group was 41 ± 0.91 years, and the LBR was 21.6%. The eSBT group and the DBT group achieved similar clinical pregnancy rates (33 vs. 33%) (OR 1.04; 95%CI, 0.62-1.75) and LBRs (20 vs. 22.8%) (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 0.78-2.64). The multiple birth rate was lower in the eSBT group (0 vs. 16%, p = 0.02). The subgroup of women who had elective DBT (eDBT) achieved a higher LBR (20 vs. 30.6%) (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.16-4.68) and a higher multiple birth rate (0 vs. 22%, p = 0.001). Cycles with early blastocyst transfers were associated with lower LBRs compared with cycles with fully expanded blastocyst transfers (11 vs. 24%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that eSBT is associated with similar LBRs compared to the entire DBT cohort; however, when supernumerary blastocysts are available for cryopreservation, eDBT is associated with both higher LBRs and a higher number of multiple births. Studies assessing the cumulative LBR in advanced maternal age after single blastocyst transfer and subsequent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced maternal age; Elective single blastocyst transfer; Live birth rate; Multiple birth rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28299549      PMCID: PMC5445045          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0906-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

Review 1.  Elective single-embryo transfer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Twin gestation in older women: antepartum, intrapartum complications, and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  N Prapas; I Kalogiannidis; I Prapas; P Xiromeritis; A Karagiannidis; G Makedos
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.

Authors:  B Wirleitner; M Schuff; A Stecher; M Murtinger; P Vanderzwalmen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.

Authors:  S Fernández-Shaw; R Cercas; C Braña; C Villas; I Pons
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development.

Authors:  P Braude; V Bolton; S Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ling Lee; David H McCulloh; Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Alexis Adler; Caroline McCaffrey; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft; L Wagley; T Schlenker; J Stevens; J Hesla
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Elective single embryo transfer in women less than age 38 years reduces multiple birth rates, but not live birth rates, in United States fertility clinics.

Authors:  Abigail C Mancuso; Sheree L Boulet; Eyup Duran; Erika Munch; Dmitry M Kissin; Bradley J Van Voorhis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.

Authors:  M Niinimäki; A-M Suikkari; S Mäkinen; V Söderström-Anttila; H Martikainen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.

Authors:  E Fragouli; S Alfarawati; K Spath; D Wells
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  9 in total

1.  A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinic.

Authors:  I De Croo; P De Sutter; K Tilleman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-09-22

2.  Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles.

Authors:  Junshun Fang; Lihua Zhu; Dong Li; Zhipeng Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Ningyuan Zhang; Linjun Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comparative study on the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer between patients with different ovarian responses (a STROBE-compliant article).

Authors:  Hai-Xia Jin; Ai-Xiang Lv; Zhao-Ting Wu; Shuang Wen; Xiang-Yang Zhang; Da-Chuan Jin; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujuan Ma; Yangqin Peng; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Yi Tang; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Extended embryo culture is effective for patients of an advanced maternal age.

Authors:  R Sainte-Rose; C Petit; L Dijols; C Frapsauce; F Guerif
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Feasibility of All-Blastocyst-Culture and Single Blastocyst Transfer Strategy in Elderly Women: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Weijue Su; Jialing Xu; Samuel Kofi Arhin; Chang Liu; Junzhao Zhao; Xiaosheng Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?

Authors:  Wenjie Wang; Jiali Cai; Lanlan Liu; Yingpei Xu; Zhenfang Liu; Jinghua Chen; Xiaoming Jiang; Xiaohua Sun; Jianzhi Ren
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Live birth rate and neonatal outcomes of different quantities and qualities of frozen transferred blastocyst in patients requiring whole embryo freezing stratified by age.

Authors:  Shiping Chen; Hongzi Du; Jianqiao Liu; Haiying Liu; Lei Li; Yuxia He
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Long; Yuanyuan Wang; Fangrong Wu; Rong Li; Lixue Chen; Weiping Qian; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.060

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.