Literature DB >> 25403438

Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.

S Fernández-Shaw1, R Cercas, C Braña, C Villas, I Pons.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if blastocyst transfer increases the ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rates, compared with day 3 embryo transfer, in women of all ages when at least 4 zygotes are obtained.
METHODS: Prospective study including patients undergoing a first IVF/ICSI treatment and assigned to cleavage stage (n = 46) or blastocyst (n = 58) embryo transfer. Supernumerary embryos were vitrified and patients failing to achieve an ongoing pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer would go through cryopreserved cycles. The main outcome measure was the ongoing pregnancy rate after the fresh IVF/ICSI transfer and the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate. Results were also analyzed according to age (under 35 and 35 or older).
RESULTS: A majority of patients (96.6 %) had a blastocyst transfer when at least 4 zygotes were obtained. The ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the day-5 group compared with the day-3 group (43.1 % vs. 24 %, p = 0.041). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was higher (but not significantly) with blastocyst than with cleavage stage embryos (56.8 % vs. 43.4 %, p = 0.174). When analysed by age, patients 35 or older showed significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate (48.4 % vs. 19.3 %, p = 0.016) and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate (58 % vs. 25.8 %, p = 0.01) in the day-5 group compared to the day-3 group, while no such differences were observed in women under 35.
CONCLUSIONS: Blastocyst transfer can be suggested whenever there are at least 4 zygotes. While there are no differences in women under 35, the benefit of this option over cleavage stage transfer could be significant in women 35 or older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403438      PMCID: PMC4354180          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0387-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine Staessen; Peter Platteau; Elvire Van Assche; An Michiels; Herman Tournaye; Michel Camus; Paul Devroey; Inge Liebaers; André Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  F Guerif; M Lemseffer; R Bidault; O Gasnier; M H Saussereau; V Cadoret; C Jamet; D Royere
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Influence of advanced age on the blastocyst development rate and pregnancy rate in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  K Pantos; V Athanasiou; K Stefanidis; D Stavrou; T Vaxevanoglou; M Chronopoulou
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer.

Authors:  Ingrid Van der Auwera; Sophie Debrock; Carl Spiessens; Hilde Afschrift; Els Bakelants; Christel Meuleman; Luc Meeuwis; Thomas M D'Hooghe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  S Coskun; J Hollanders; S Al-Hassan; H Al-Sufyan; H Al-Mayman; K Jaroudi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Debbie Blake; Cindy Farquhar; Ariel Bardach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

7.  A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft; L Wagley; T Schlenker; J Stevens; J Hesla
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Herman Tournaye; Christos A Venetis; Human Fatemi; Basil Tarlatzis; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.

Authors:  Ana Cobo; María José de los Santos; Damià Castellò; Pilar Gámiz; Pilar Campos; José Remohí
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Impact of day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer on pregnancy rates and multiple gestations.

Authors:  Ronald Beesley; Randal Robinson; Anthony Propst; Nancy Arthur; Matthew Retzloff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  20 in total

1.  A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; Wael Salem; Sami I Jabara; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  MeiFang Zeng; SuQin Su; LiuMing Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry.

Authors:  Cheng-He Yu; Ruo-Peng Zhang; Juan Li; Zhou-Cun A
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Samer Tannus; Weon-Young Son; Michael Haim Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers.

Authors:  Ye Yin; Ge Chen; Kezhen Li; Qiuyue Liao; Sijia Zhang; Nieying Ma; Jing Chen; Yan Zhang; Jihui Ai
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar; Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo; Agustín Ciapponi; Simone Cornelisse; Deborah Blake
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-19

7.  Maternal and obstetric outcomes are influenced by developmental stage and cryopreservation of transferred embryos after clomiphene citrate-based minimal stimulation IVF.

Authors:  Sachie Onogi; Kenji Ezoe; Nami Kawasaki; Hiroko Hayashi; Tomoko Kuroda; Kazumi Takeshima; Kaou Tanoue; Shogo Nishii; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-04-08

8.  Reduced Ectopic Pregnancy Rate on Day 5 Embryo Transfer Compared with Day 3: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bingqian Zhang; Linlin Cui; Rong Tang; Lingling Ding; Lei Yan; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.

Authors:  Zoha Saket; Karin Källén; Kersti Lundin; Åsa Magnusson; Christina Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  Pre-Implantation Mouse Embryos Cultured In Vitro under Different Oxygen Concentrations Show Altered Ultrastructures.

Authors:  Manuel Belli; Paolo Rinaudo; Maria Grazia Palmerini; Elena Ruggeri; Sevastiani Antonouli; Stefania Annarita Nottola; Guido Macchiarelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.