Literature DB >> 27376458

Elective single embryo transfer in women less than age 38 years reduces multiple birth rates, but not live birth rates, in United States fertility clinics.

Abigail C Mancuso1, Sheree L Boulet2, Eyup Duran3, Erika Munch3, Dmitry M Kissin2, Bradley J Van Voorhis3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of elective single ET (eSET) on live birth and multiple birth rates by a cycle-level and clinic-level analysis.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Patient ages <35 and 35-37 years old. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinics were divided into groups based on eSET rate for each age group and aggregate rates of live birth per ET and multiple birth per delivery were calculated. A cycle-level analysis comparing eSET and double ET (DET) live birth and multiple birth rates was also performed, stratified based on total number (2, 3, or 4+) of embryos available, embryo stage, and patient age. RESULT(S): There was a linear decrease in multiple birth rate with increasing eSET rate and no significant difference in clinic-level live birth rates for each age group. Cycle-level analysis found slightly higher live birth rates with double ET, but this was mainly observed in women aged 35-37 years or with four or more embryos available for transfer, and confirmed the marked reduction in multiple births with eSET. CONCLUSION(S): Our study showed a marked and linear reduction in multiple birth rates, and important, little to no effect on clinic-level live birth rates with increasing rates of eSET supporting the growing evidence that eSET is effective in decreasing the high multiple birth rates associated with IVF and suggests that eSET should be used more frequently than is currently practiced. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elective single embryo transfer; IVF; live birth rate; multiple birth rate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27376458     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

1.  [Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer].

Authors:  Ling Sun; Zhi-Heng Chen; Min-Na Yin; Yu Deng; Jun Liu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

2.  Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Samer Tannus; Weon-Young Son; Michael Haim Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Maximum Number of Embryos to be Transferred in Assisted Reproductive Technologies cycle: Ethics Opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Should single embryo transfer be used in patients with any kind of infertility factor? Preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Pedro Aa Monteleone; Paula Gmf Petersen; Pedro Fm Peregrino; Juliana Miorin; Alecsandra P Gomes; Mariana G Fujii; Hamilton de Martin; Tatiana Cs Bonetti; Sergio P Gonçalves
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-08-22

Review 5.  Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment.

Authors:  Benjamin J Peipert; Melissa N Montoya; Bronwyn S Bedrick; David B Seifer; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Pathways to fatherhood: evaluating the priorities of self-identified gay and bisexual men pursuing family building options.

Authors:  Brent M Hanson; Mark P Leondires; Haley N Glatthorn; Daniel J Kaser; James M Hotaling; Philip J Cheng
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-10-11

7.  The Potential of Nanotechnology in Medically Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Mariana H Remião; Natalia V Segatto; Adriana Pohlmann; Silvia S Guterres; Fabiana K Seixas; Tiago Collares
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Elective transfer of one embryo is associated with a higher cumulative live birth rate and improved perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of two embryos with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Rachel B Mejia; Emily A Capper; Karen M Summers; Patrick Ten Eyck; Bradley J Van Voorhis
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-11-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.