Literature DB >> 24184690

Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.

E Fragouli1, S Alfarawati, K Spath, D Wells.   

Abstract

Morphological assessments are the main way in which fertility clinics select in vitro generated embryo(s) for transfer to the uterus. However, it is widely acknowledged that the microscopic appearance of an embryo is only weakly correlated with its viability. Furthermore, the extent to which morphology is affected by aneuploidy, a genetic defect common in human preimplantation embryos, remains unclear. Aneuploidy is of great relevance to embryo selection as it represents one of the most important causes of implantation failure and miscarriage. The current study aimed to examine whether morphological appearance can assist in identifying embryos at risk of aneuploidy. Additionally, the data produced sheds light on how chromosomal anomalies impact development from the cleavage to the blastocyst stage. A total of 1213 embryos were examined. Comprehensive chromosome analysis was combined with well-established criteria for the assessment of embryo morphology. At the cleavage stage, chromosome abnormalities were common even amongst embryos assigned the best morphological scores, indicating that aneuploidy has little effect on microscopic appearance at fixed time points up until Day 3 of development. However, at the blastocyst stage aneuploidies were found to be significantly less common among embryos of optimal morphological quality, while such abnormalities were overrepresented amongst embryos considered to be of poor morphology. Despite the link between aneuploidy and blastocyst appearance, many chromosomally abnormal embryos were able to achieve the highest morphological scores. In particular, blastocysts affected by forms of aneuploidy with the greatest capacity to produce clinical pregnancies (e.g. trisomy 21) were indistinguishable from euploid embryos. The sex ratio was seen to be equal throughout preimplantation development. Interestingly, however, females were overrepresented amongst the fastest growing cleavage-stage embryos, whereas a sex-related skew in the opposite direction was noted for the most rapidly developing blastocysts. In summary, this study confirms that, at the cleavage stage, chromosome abnormalities have little if any effect on morphological scores assigned using traditional criteria. At the blastocyst stage some forms of aneuploidy begin to affect microscopic appearance, but in most instances the impact is subtle. In the case of the most clinically relevant aneuploidies (those capable of forming a pregnancy) there was no detectable effect on morphology at any preimplantation stage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aCGH; aneuploidy; blastocyst stage; cleavage stage; embryo morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24184690     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gat073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  43 in total

1.  Mosaicism: throwing the baby out with the bath water?

Authors:  Mario Vega; Sangita Jindal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality.

Authors:  Stacy Colaco; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Mosaicism in health and disease - clones picking up speed.

Authors:  Lars A Forsberg; David Gisselsson; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Federico Cirillo; Antonella Smeraldi; Emanuela Morenghi; Giulia E G Mulazzani; Elena Albani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Male factor infertility impacts the rate of mosaic blastocysts in cycles of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Cristina Lagalla; Giovanni Coticchio; Carlotta Zacà; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.

Authors:  Ange Wang; Jonathan Kort; Barry Behr; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Oleksii O Barash; Kristen A Ivani; Susan P Willman; Evan M Rosenbluth; Deborah S Wachs; Mary D Hinckley; Sara Pittenger Reid; Louis N Weckstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Human embryo mosaicism: did we drop the ball on chromosomal testing?

Authors:  Navid Esfandiari; Megan E Bunnell; Robert F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.