Literature DB >> 28299409

Nothing magical: pantomimed grasping is controlled by the ventral system.

Thijs Rinsma1, John van der Kamp2,3, Matt Dicks4, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland5.   

Abstract

In a recent amendment to the two-visual-system model, it has been proposed that actions must result in tactile contact with the goal object for the dorsal system to become engaged (Whitwell et al., Neuropsychologia 55:41-50, 2014). The present study tested this addition by assessing the use of allocentric information in normal and pantomime actions. To this end, magicians, and participants who were inexperienced in performing pantomime actions made normal and pantomime grasps toward objects embedded in the Müller-Lyer illusion. During pantomime grasping, a grasp was made next to an object that was in full view (i.e., a displaced pantomime grasping task). The results showed that pantomime grasps took longer, were slower, and had smaller hand apertures than normal grasping. Most importantly, hand apertures were affected by the illusion during pantomime grasping but not in normal grasping, indicating that displaced pantomime grasping is based on allocentric information. This was true for participants without experience in performing pantomime grasps as well as for magicians with experience in pantomiming. The finding that the illusory bias is limited to pantomime grasping and persists with experience supports the conjecture that the normal engagement of the dorsal system's contribution requires tactile contact with a goal object. If no tactile contact is made, then movement control shifts toward the ventral system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocentric information; Grasping; Pantomime; Two-visual systems; Visual illusion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28299409      PMCID: PMC5435791          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4868-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

2.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 3.  Towards a science of magic.

Authors:  Gustav Kuhn; Alym A Amlani; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Y Rossetti
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-09

6.  Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  D A Westwood; T McEachern; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Patient DF's visual brain in action: Visual feedforward control in visual form agnosia.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; A David Milner; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Masihullah Barat; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  No dissociation between perception and action in patient DF when haptic feedback is withdrawn.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.

Authors:  Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Jenni M Karl; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.