Literature DB >> 25199609

Patient DF's visual brain in action: Visual feedforward control in visual form agnosia.

Robert L Whitwell1, A David Milner2, Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi2, Masihullah Barat3, Melvyn A Goodale4.   

Abstract

Patient DF, who developed visual form agnosia following ventral-stream damage, is unable to discriminate the width of objects, performing at chance, for example, when asked to open her thumb and forefinger a matching amount. Remarkably, however, DF adjusts her hand aperture to accommodate the width of objects when reaching out to pick them up (grip scaling). While this spared ability to grasp objects is presumed to be mediated by visuomotor modules in her relatively intact dorsal stream, it is possible that it may rely abnormally on online visual or haptic feedback. We report here that DF's grip scaling remained intact when her vision was completely suppressed during grasp movements, and it still dissociated sharply from her poor perceptual estimates of target size. We then tested whether providing trial-by-trial haptic feedback after making such perceptual estimates might improve DF's performance, but found that they remained significantly impaired. In a final experiment, we re-examined whether DF's grip scaling depends on receiving veridical haptic feedback during grasping. In one condition, the haptic feedback was identical to the visual targets. In a second condition, the haptic feedback was of a constant intermediate width while the visual target varied trial by trial. Despite this incongruent feedback, DF still scaled her grip aperture to the visual widths of the target blocks, showing only normal adaptation to the false haptically-experienced width. Taken together, these results strengthen the view that DF's spared grasping relies on a normal mode of dorsal-stream functioning, based chiefly on visual feedforward processing.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grasping; Haptic feedback; Patient DF; Two visual systems hypothesis; Visual feedback; Visual form agnosia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25199609     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Nothing magical: pantomimed grasping is controlled by the ventral system.

Authors:  Thijs Rinsma; John van der Kamp; Matt Dicks; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Tzvi Ganel; Caitlin M Byrne; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis: New Challenges and Insights from Visual form Agnosic Patient DF.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; A David Milner; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Gaze-behaviors of runners in a natural, urban running environment.

Authors:  Mark M Cullen; Daniel Schmitt; Michael C Granatosky; Christine E Wall; Michael Platt; Roxanne Larsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.