Literature DB >> 28290007

Impact of Urban Neighborhood Disadvantage on Late Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Virginia.

Pam Baker DeGuzman1, Wendy F Cohn2, Fabian Camacho2, Brandy L Edwards3, Vanessa N Sturz2, Anneke T Schroen3.   

Abstract

Research suggests that residents of inner-city urban neighborhoods have higher rates of late stage cancer diagnosis. Identifying urban neighborhoods with high rates of both concentrated disadvantage and late stage cancer diagnosis may assist health care providers to target screening interventions to reduce disparities. The purposes of this study were to (1) create an index to evaluate concentrated disadvantage (CD) using non-racial measures of poverty, (2) determine the impact of neighborhood CD on late stage breast cancer diagnosis in US cities, and (3) to understand the role of obesity on this relationship. We used census block group- (CBG) level poverty indicators from five Virginia cities to develop the index. Breast cancer cases of women aged 18-65 who lived in the five cities were identified from the 2000-2012 Virginia Cancer Registry. A logistic regression model with random intercept was used to evaluate the impact of disadvantage on late stage breast cancer diagnosis. CBG-level maps were developed to geographically identify neighborhoods with both high rates of CD and late breast cancer staging. Over 900 CBGs and 6000 breast cases were included. Global fit of the concentrated disadvantage model was acceptable. The effect of disadvantage on late stage was significant (OR = 1.0083, p = 0.032). Inner-city poverty impacts risk of late stage breast cancer diagnosis. Area-level obesity is highly correlated with neighborhood poverty (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.0001) but the mediating direct and indirect effects are non-significant. Intervening in these high poverty neighborhoods may help combat disparities in late stage diagnosis for urban poor and for minorities living in these underserved neighborhoods, but more study is needed to understanding the complex relationship between concentrated neighborhood poverty, obesity, and late stage diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Concentrated disadvantage; Neighborhood; Poverty; Stage of diagnosis; Urban health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28290007      PMCID: PMC5391338          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-017-0142-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  24 in total

1.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Geocoding in cancer research: a review.

Authors:  Gerard Rushton; Marc P Armstrong; Josephine Gittler; Barry R Greene; Claire E Pavlik; Michele M West; Dale L Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Weighing the importance of neighbourhood: a multilevel exploration of the determinants of overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Daniel W Harrington; Susan J Elliott
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Factorial Invariance within Longitudinal Structural Equation Models: Measuring the Same Construct across Time.

Authors:  Keith F Widaman; Emilio Ferrer; Rand D Conger
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Dajun Dai
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  Cancer in relation to socioeconomic status: stage at diagnosis in Texas, 2004-2008.

Authors:  David R Risser; Eric A Miller
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 7.  Disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in urban and rural adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sallyanne Nguyen-Pham; Janni Leung; Deirdre McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Rural-urban disparities in stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in Australian women.

Authors:  Janni Leung; Jennifer Martin; Deirdre McLaughlin
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.662

9.  Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeffe; Elizabeth A Baker; Mark S Walker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Neighborhood socio-economic disadvantage and race/ethnicity as predictors of breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Yvonne N Flores; Pamela L Davidson; Terry T Nakazono; Daisy C Carreon; Cynthia M Mojica; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Disadvantaged neighborhoods and racial disparity in breast cancer outcomes: the biological link.

Authors:  Geetanjali Saini; Angela Ogden; Lauren E McCullough; Mylin Torres; Padmashree Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Medicaid Expansion Associated With Reduction in Geospatial Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Disparities.

Authors:  Weichuan Dong; Johnie Rose; Uriel Kim; Gregory S Cooper; Jennifer Tsui; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 3.  Interconnected Clinical and Social Risk Factors in Breast Cancer and Heart Failure.

Authors:  Arjun Sinha; Avni Bavishi; Elizabeth A Hibler; Eric H Yang; Susmita Parashar; Tochukwu Okwuosa; Jeanne M DeCara; Sherry-Ann Brown; Avirup Guha; Diego Sadler; Sadiya S Khan; Sanjiv J Shah; Clyde W Yancy; Nausheen Akhter
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Alison Beauchamp; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Annie Cooper; Vicki Pridmore; Patricia Livingston; Matthew Scanlon; Melissa Davis; Jonathan O'Hara; Richard Osborne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Developing a Priority Scoring Index for Mobile Mammography Sites: Considerations for Screening Access in Rural and Remote Settings.

Authors:  Emma McKim Mitchell; Fabian Camacho
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.