Literature DB >> 35420579

Medicaid Expansion Associated With Reduction in Geospatial Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Disparities.

Weichuan Dong1, Johnie Rose, Uriel Kim, Gregory S Cooper, Jennifer Tsui, Siran M Koroukian.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Prior studies demonstrate that Medicaid expansion has been associated with earlier-stage breast cancer diagnosis among women with low income, likely through increased access to cancer screening services. However, how this policy change has impacted geospatial disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there were reductions in geospatial disparities in advanced stage breast cancer at diagnosis in Ohio after Medicaid expansion.
DESIGN: The study included 33 537 women aged 40 to 64 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System between 2010 and 2017. The space-time scan statistic was used to detect clusters of advanced stage at diagnosis before and after Medicaid expansion. Block group variables from the Census were used to describe the contextual characteristics of detected clusters.
RESULTS: The percentage of local stage diagnosis among women with breast cancer increased from 60.2% in the pre-expansion period (2010-2013) to 62.6% in the post-expansion period (2014-2017), while the uninsured rate among those women decreased from 13.7% to 7.5% during the same period. Two statistically significant ( P < .05) and 6 nonsignificant spatial clusters ( P > .05) of advanced stage breast cancer cases were found in the pre-expansion period, while none were found in the post-expansion period. These clusters were in the 4 largest metropolitan areas in Ohio, and individuals inside the clusters were more likely to be disadvantaged along numerous socioeconomic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion has played an important role in reducing geospatial disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis, likely through the reduction of advanced stage disease among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35420579      PMCID: PMC9308621          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  22 in total

1.  Use of a geographic information system to identify and characterize areas with high proportions of distant stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Roche; Ric Skinner; Rachel B Weinstein
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2002-03

2.  Breast cancer screening, area deprivation, and later-stage breast cancer in Appalachia: does geography matter?

Authors:  Roger T Anderson; Tse-Chang Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Fabian Camacho; Teresa Kern; Heath B Mackley; Gretchen Kimmick; Christopher Louis; Eugene Lengerich; Nengliang Yao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Comparison of Insurance Status and Diagnosis Stage Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Before vs After Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Xuesong Han; K Robin Yabroff; Elizabeth Ward; Otis W Brawley; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Healthcare access, socioeconomic factors and late-stage cancer diagnosis: an exploratory spatial analysis and public policy implication.

Authors:  Fahui Wang; Lan Luo; Sara McLafferty
Journal:  Int J Public Pol       Date:  2009-12-28

5.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Rural reversal? Rural-urban disparities in late-stage cancer risk in Illinois.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Fahui Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Changes in Insurance Coverage and Stage at Diagnosis Among Nonelderly Patients With Cancer After the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Amy J Davidoff; Xuesong Han
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A flexibly shaped spatial scan statistic for detecting clusters.

Authors:  Toshiro Tango; Kunihiko Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  A space-time analysis of the proportion of late stage breast cancer in Massachusetts, 1988 to 1997.

Authors:  T Joseph Sheehan; Laurie M DeChello
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 3.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.