Literature DB >> 28283606

Predictive Value of RAPID Assessed Perfusion Thresholds on Final Infarct Volume in SWIFT PRIME (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment).

Maxim Mokin1, Elad I Levy2, Jeffrey L Saver2, Adnan H Siddiqui2, Mayank Goyal2, Alain Bonafé2, Christophe Cognard2, Reza Jahan2, Gregory W Albers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Computed tomography perfusion imaging can estimate the size of the ischemic core, which can be used for the selection of patients for endovascular therapy. The relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) thresholds chosen to identify ischemic core influence the accuracy of prediction. We aimed to analyze the accuracy of various rCBV and rCBF thresholds for predicting the 27-hour infarct volume using RAPID automated analysis software from the SWIFT PRIME trial (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment) data.
METHODS: Patients from the SWIFT PRIME study who achieved complete reperfusion based on time until the residue function reached its peak >6 s perfusion maps obtained at 27 hours were included. Patients from both the intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator only and endovascular groups were included in analysis. Final infarct volume was determined on magnetic resonance imaging (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images) or computed tomography scans obtained 27 hours after symptom onset. The predicted ischemic core volumes on rCBV and rCBF maps using thresholds ranging between 0.2 and 0.8 were compared with the actual infarct volume to determine the most accurate thresholds.
RESULTS: Among the 47 subjects, the following baseline computed tomography perfusion thresholds most accurately predicted the actual 27-hour infarct volume: rCBV=0.32, median absolute error (MAE)=9 mL; rCBV=0.34, MAE=9 mL; rCBF=0.30, MAE=8.8 mL; rCBF=0.32, MAE=7 mL; and rCBF=0.34, MAE=7.3.
CONCLUSIONS: Brain regions with rCBF 0.30 to 0.34 or rCBV 0.32 to 0.34 thresholds provided the most accurate prediction of infarct volume in patients who achieved complete reperfusion with MAEs of ≤9 mL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01657461.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain; cerebral blood volume; perfusion imaging; reperfusion; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28283606     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  30 in total

1.  Automated CT Perfusion Imaging Versus Non-contrast CT for Ischemic Core Assessment in Large Vessel Occlusion.

Authors:  Anderson Chun On Tsang; Stephanie Lenck; Christopher Hilditch; Patrick Nicholson; Waleed Brinjikji; Timo Krings; Vitor M Pereira; Frank L Silver; Joanna D Schaafsma
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  [Imaging in acute ischemic stroke using automated postprocessing algorithms].

Authors:  K Egger; C Strecker; E Kellner; H Urbach
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Effect of computed tomography perfusion post-processing algorithms on optimal threshold selection for final infarct volume prediction.

Authors:  Ryan A Rava; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Muhammad Waqas; Ariana B Allman; Jillian L Senko; Alexander R Podgorsak; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-06-23

4.  Ischemic lesion growth in acute stroke: Water uptake quantification distinguishes between edema and tissue infarct.

Authors:  Gabriel Broocks; Uta Hanning; Tobias D Faizy; Alexandra Scheibel; Jawed Nawabi; Gerhard Schön; Nils D Forkert; Soenke Langner; Jens Fiehler; Susanne Gellißen; Andre Kemmling
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Performance of angiographic parametric imaging in locating infarct core in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Ryan A Rava; Maxim Mokin; Kenneth V Snyder; Muhammad Waqas; Adnan H Siddiqui; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-11

6.  An acute stroke CT imaging algorithm incorporating automated perfusion analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Byrne; John P Walsh; Peter J MacMahon
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-02-01

7.  Recent Administration of Iodinated Contrast Renders Core Infarct Estimation Inaccurate Using RAPID Software.

Authors:  A Z Copelan; E R Smith; G T Drocton; K H Narsinh; D Murph; R S Khangura; Z J Hartley; A A Abla; W P Dillon; C F Dowd; R T Higashida; V V Halbach; S W Hetts; D L Cooke; K Keenan; J Nelson; D Mccoy; M Ciano; M R Amans
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Assessment of Ischemic Volumes by Using Relative Filling Time Delay on CTP Source Image in Patients with Acute Stroke with Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusions.

Authors:  W Cao; Y Ling; L Yang; F Wu; X Cheng; Q Dong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Assessment of a Bayesian Vitrea CT Perfusion Analysis to Predict Final Infarct and Penumbra Volumes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison with RAPID.

Authors:  R A Rava; K V Snyder; M Mokin; M Waqas; A B Allman; J L Senko; A R Podgorsak; M M Shiraz Bhurwani; Y Hoi; A H Siddiqui; J M Davies; E I Levy; C N Ionita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Comparison of multimodal CT scan protocols used for decision-making on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Rujimas Khumtong; Timo Krings; Vitor M Pereira; Aleksandra Pikula; Joanna D Schaafsma
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.