W Cao1, Y Ling1, L Yang1, F Wu1, X Cheng1, Q Dong2,3. 1. From the Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology (W.C., Y.L., L.Y., F.W., X.C., Q.D.), Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 2. From the Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology (W.C., Y.L., L.Y., F.W., X.C., Q.D.), Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China dongqiang2222@gmail.com. 3. State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology (Q.D.), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thrombectomy up to 24 hours after stroke onset in patients with specific ischemic brain volumes remains a challenge, because many stroke centers do not apply specialized software to calculate ischemic volumes at advanced imaging. We aimed to establish the association between relative filling time delay on CTP source imaging and ischemic volume parameters and the infarct penumbra to core volume mismatch in patients with acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and with M1 segment MCA with or without terminal ICA occlusions on baseline CTA and CTP within 24 hours of stroke symptom onset were included. Ischemic volumes were analyzed with software based on CTP maps. Relative filling time delay was classified into 4 grades-grade 0: relative filling time delay = 0 seconds; grade 1: relative filling time delay >0 to ≤4 seconds; grade 2: relative filling time delay >4 to ≤8 seconds; and grade 3: relative filling time delay > 8 seconds. Differences in ischemic volume parameters among relative filling time delay grades were tested. RESULTS: We recruited 138 patients (median age, 69 years; 62.3% male). Different median volumes of the infarct core (grade 0, 7.3 mL; grade 1, 23.3 mL; grade 2, 45.7 mL; grade 3, 135 mL [P < .001]) and the penumbra (grade 0, 47.6 mL; grade 1, 90 mL; grade 2, 110 mL; grade 3, 92 mL [P = .043]) were observed among relative filling time delay grades. Target mismatch (defined by the criteria of the DEFUSE 3 trial) was identified in 71.7% of the patients (99/138). A relative filling time delay grade ≤ 1 independently predicted target mismatch, with a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.7-0.87) and a specificity of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.49-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Relative filling time delay grade based on CTP source imaging is a simple and effective parameter for evaluating ischemic volumes and target mismatch in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further studies that compare relative filling time delay grade with clinical functional outcomes are necessary.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thrombectomy up to 24 hours after stroke onset in patients with specific ischemic brain volumes remains a challenge, because many stroke centers do not apply specialized software to calculate ischemic volumes at advanced imaging. We aimed to establish the association between relative filling time delay on CTP source imaging and ischemic volume parameters and the infarct penumbra to core volume mismatch in patients with acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and with M1 segment MCA with or without terminal ICA occlusions on baseline CTA and CTP within 24 hours of stroke symptom onset were included. Ischemic volumes were analyzed with software based on CTP maps. Relative filling time delay was classified into 4 grades-grade 0: relative filling time delay = 0 seconds; grade 1: relative filling time delay >0 to ≤4 seconds; grade 2: relative filling time delay >4 to ≤8 seconds; and grade 3: relative filling time delay > 8 seconds. Differences in ischemic volume parameters among relative filling time delay grades were tested. RESULTS: We recruited 138 patients (median age, 69 years; 62.3% male). Different median volumes of the infarct core (grade 0, 7.3 mL; grade 1, 23.3 mL; grade 2, 45.7 mL; grade 3, 135 mL [P < .001]) and the penumbra (grade 0, 47.6 mL; grade 1, 90 mL; grade 2, 110 mL; grade 3, 92 mL [P = .043]) were observed among relative filling time delay grades. Target mismatch (defined by the criteria of the DEFUSE 3 trial) was identified in 71.7% of the patients (99/138). A relative filling time delay grade ≤ 1 independently predicted target mismatch, with a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.7-0.87) and a specificity of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.49-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Relative filling time delay grade based on CTP source imaging is a simple and effective parameter for evaluating ischemic volumes and target mismatch in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further studies that compare relative filling time delay grade with clinical functional outcomes are necessary.
Authors: S Dehkharghani; R Bammer; M Straka; L S Albin; O Kass-Hout; J W Allen; S Rangaraju; D Qiu; M J Winningham; F Nahab Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Nawaf Yassi; Henry Ma; Gagan Sharma; Simon Salinas; Leonid Churilov; Atte Meretoja; Mark W Parsons; Patricia M Desmond; Maarten G Lansberg; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Mark Parsons; Neil Spratt; Andrew Bivard; Bruce Campbell; Kong Chung; Ferdinand Miteff; Bill O'Brien; Christopher Bladin; Patrick McElduff; Chris Allen; Grant Bateman; Geoffrey Donnan; Stephen Davis; Christopher Levi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Werner Hacke; Anthony J Furlan; Yasir Al-Rawi; Antoni Davalos; Jochen B Fiebach; Franz Gruber; Markku Kaste; Leslie J Lipka; Salvador Pedraza; Peter A Ringleb; Howard A Rowley; Dietmar Schneider; Lee H Schwamm; Joaquin Serena Leal; Mariola Söhngen; Phil A Teal; Karin Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi; Max Wintermark; Steven Warach Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Andrew Bivard; Tim Kleinig; Ferdinand Miteff; Kenneth Butcher; Longting Lin; Christopher Levi; Mark Parsons Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 10.422